The Role of Metacognitive Instruction in Developing ESL/EFL Listening Abilities: A Theoretical and Empirical Review

  • Ani Fiani STKIP PGRI Lubuklinggau

Abstract

Due to metacognition, as a psychological concept, has been a focus of educational researchers and become a potential to empower students to improve their own learning; increase the meaningfulness of learning, especially among students who are having problems in learning; and become successful learners, the present paper implicatively investigates the possible role of metacognitive instruction in developing ESL/EFL listening abilities among students by providing theoretical and empirical foundations drawn from the literature. To elicit the purpose of this article, the literature study was used. This study reviewed several recent research papers in the last 10 years related to the implementation of metacognitive instruction in order to elicit the information of the possibilities in developing ESL/EFL students’ listening comprehension abilities. Based on a detailed analysis and review of the research articles, there were some themes related to the possibility role of implementing the instruction not only developing ESL/EFL listening abilities, but also metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive awareness. Moreover, the instruction enables ESL/EFL students to increase their awareness of the listening process by improving richer metacognitive knowledge about themselves as listeners, the nature and demands of listening tasks, and listening strategies. This instruction they may encourage them to have an ability to regulate their own learning in and outside ESL/EFL classrooms. Therefore, based on the literature review  and analysis above, ESL/EFL teachers will regard the important role of metacognition and attempt to implement the instruction as an alternative of effective teaching ways to develop ESL/EFL students’ listening abilities in and outside the classroom independently, particularly in the context of higher education in Indonesia.

Keywords: metacognition, metacognitive awareness, metacognitive instruction, listening abilities

References

Anderson, N. J. (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning. ERIC Digest.

Birjandi, P., & Rahimi, A. H. (2012). The Effect of Metacognitive Strategy Instruction on the listening performance of EFL Students. Internationa Journal of Linguistics, 4 (2), 495-517.

Brown, A. L. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In R. J. Spiro, B. Bruce, and W.Brewer (Eds.), Theoreical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 453-482). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cahyono, B. Y., & Widiati, U. (2009). The teaching of EFL Listening in the Indonesian Context: The State of the art. TEFLIN Journal, 20 (2), 194-211.

Chang, C. –S., & Millett, S. (2015). Improving reading rates and comprehension through audio-assisted extensive reading for beginner learners. System, 52, 91-102.

Chen, C. C., & Huang, C. T. (2011). Raising EFL Collefe Students’ Metacognitive awareness about listening. Paper presented at the NYS TESOL 41st Annual Conference, Melville, NY.

Clark, P., & Cresswell, J. W. (2010). Designing and Conducting mixed methods research (2nd Eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Coskun, A. (2013). The effect of metacognitive strategy training on the listening performance of beginner students. Research on Youth and Language, 4(1), 35-50.

Field, J. (2002). The changing face of listening. In methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. J. Richards and W. Renandya (Eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.

Goh, C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problem. System, 28, 55-75.

Goh, C. (2002). Learners’ self-reports on comprehension and Learning strategies for listening. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 12, 46-68.

Goh, C. (2008). Metacognitive Instruction for second language listening development: theory, practice and research implications. RELC Journal, 39(2), 188-213.

Goh, C. (2010). Listening as process: learning activities for self-appraisal and self-regulation. In N. Harwood (Ed.), Materials in ELT: Theory and Practice (pp. 179-206). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Goh, C., & Taib, Y. (2006). Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners. ELT Journal, 60, 222-232.

Graham, S. (2006). Listening comprehension: the students’ perspective. System: an International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied linguistics, 34, 165-182.

Hacker, D. J. Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (2009). Handbook of metacognition in Education. Mahwah, NJ. Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis.

Krashen, S. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: issues and implication. London: Longman.

Malik, F. A., muhamad, A. J., & Ibrahim, E. H. (2013). Effects of metacognitive listening strategy training on listening comprehension and strategy use of ESL leaners. World Applied Science Journal, 57-66.

Mbato, C. L. (2013). Facilitating EFL learners’ self-regulation in reading: implementing a metacognitive approach in an Indonesian higher education context. PhD thesis. Lismore, NSW: Southern Cross University.

Mendelsohn, D. (1994). There ARE strategies for Listening. TEAL Occasional Papers, 8, 63-76.

Mendelsohn, D. (1995). Applying learning strategies in the second/foreign language listening comprehension lesson. In Mendelsohn and Rubin (eds.). A Guide for the teaching of second language listening. San Diego: Dominie Press. 132-50.

Mendelsohn, D. (1998). Teaching listening. Annual Review of Applied linguistics. 18, 3-19.

O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewnew-Mazanares, G., Russo, R, & Kupper, L. (1985). Learning strategies applications with students of English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 285-296.

O’Malley, J.M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.

Pammu, A., Amir, Z., & Maasum, T.N. (2013). Metacognitive reading strategies of less proficient tertiary learners: a case study of EFL learners at a public university in Makasar, Indonesia. Procedia, 118, 357-364.

Pressley, M., & L. W. Gaskins. (2006). Metacognitively competent reading comprehension is constructively responsive reading: How can such reading be developed in students? Metacognition learning, 1, 99-113.

Rahimirad, M. (2014). The Impact of Metacognitive Strategy Instruction on the Listening performance of University Students. Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1485-1491.

Rasouli, M., Mollakhan, K., & Karbalaei, A. (2013). The effect of metacognitive listening strategy training on listening comprehension in Iranian EFL Context. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2 (1), 115-128.

Richards, J. C. (2008). Teaching listening and speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
Ridley, D. S., Schutz, P. A., Glanz, R.S., & Weinstein, C.E. (1992). Self-regulated learning: the interactive influence of metacognitive awareness and goal setting. Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 293-306.

Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and researching listening. London: Longman.

Rost, M. (2005). L2 Listening. In Handbook of research on second language learning and teaching, pp: 503-527. Ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Schraw, G. & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational psychology review, 7(4), 351-371.

Selamat, S., & Sidhu, G. K. (2013). Enhancing Listening Comprehension: The Role of Metacognitive Strategy Instruction (MetSI). Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 421-430.

Seo, K. (2002). The effects of visuals on listening comprehension: A study of Japanese learners’ listening strategies. International Journal of Listening, 16, 57-81.

Thompson, I., & Rubin, J. (1996). Can Strategy instruction improve listening comprehension? Foreign language Annals, 29, 331-342.

Van Zeeland, H., & Schmitt, N. (2013). Incidental vocabulary acquisition through L2 listening: A dimensions approach. System, 41, 609-624.

Vandergrift, L & Goh, C. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. New York: Routledge.

Vandergrift, L. (2002). It was Nice to see that our predictions were right: developing Metacognition in L2 Listening Comprehension. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 58, 556-575.

Vandergrift, L. (2003). From prediction through reflection: Guiding students through the process of L2 listening. The Canadian Modern language Review, 59, 425-440.

Vandergrift, L. (2004). Learning to listen or listen to learn? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 3-25.

Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, H. M. (2010). Teaching L2 students how to listen does make a difference: An Empirical study. Language Learning, 60, 470-497.

Vidal, K. (2011). A comparison of the effects of reading and listening on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning, 61(1), 219-258.

Wang, W. (2016). Learning to listen: the impact of a metacognitive approach to listening instruction. Asia-Pacific Educational Research: Springer, 25(1), 79-88.

Wenden, A. (1987). Metacognition: an expanded view of the cognitive abilities of L2 learners. Language Learning, 37, 573-594.

Zhang, D., & Goh, C. (2006). Strategy Knowledge and perceived Strategy use: Singaporean Students’ awareness of Listening and Speaking Strategies. Language Awareness, 15, 199-219.
Published
2018-12-30
How to Cite
Fiani, A. (2018). The Role of Metacognitive Instruction in Developing ESL/EFL Listening Abilities: A Theoretical and Empirical Review. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal, 2(1), 86-99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31539/leea.v2i1.442
Abstract viewed = 47 times
pdf downloaded = 26 times