SEBUAH ANALISIS BIBLIOMETRIK TENTANG FLEKSIBILITAS KERJA DI ASIA TENGGARA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31539/costing.v7i6.10340Keywords:
Kata kunci: Fleksibilitas Kerja, Asia Tenggara, Analisis Bibliometriks, COVIS-19.Abstract
Fleksibilitas kerja semakin mendapat perhatian, terutama karena perubahan dinamis dalam dunia kerja saat ini. Meski demikian, terdapat kekurangan tinjauan meta-data mengenai publikasi tentang fleksibilitas kerja di Asia Tenggara. Oleh karena itu, tinjauan literatur ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi tema-tema utama dalam publikasi yang berkaitan dengan fleksibilitas kerja di wilayah ini, agar dapat membantu perencanaan penelitian di masa mendatang. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan menggunakan Scopus sebagai sumber data dan menerapkan kata kunci serta filter yang relevan. Analisis bibliometrik dilakukan menggunakan perangkat lunak R Studio dan VOSviewer. Hasil tinjauan ini menemukan sebanyak 222 artikel yang diterbitkan antara tahun 1990 hingga 2023, dengan rata-rata pertumbuhan tahunan sebesar 11,99% dan lonjakan signifikan pada tahun 2022. Penelitian ini melibatkan 738 penulis dan diterbitkan di 171 jurnal yang berbeda. Dari sebelas negara di Asia Tenggara, hanya enam negara yang berkontribusi aktif, dengan Malaysia menjadi yang teratas dalam produksi artikel. Kata kunci tren yang paling banyak digunakan adalah "COVID-19". Selain itu, "work from home" mendapat perhatian signifikan sebagai salah satu bentuk fleksibilitas kerja dan "job satisfaction" serta "work-life balance" sebagai konsekuensi dari kerja fleksibel. Temuan ini menyoroti adopsi yang semakin meningkat dari praktik kerja fleksibel di Asia Tenggara. Namun, penelitian lebih lanjut diperlukan untuk mengeksplorasi penerapan model-model kerja fleksibel yang mendukung penyesuaian tempat kerja perusahaan.
Kata kunci: Fleksibilitas Kerja, Asia Tenggara, Analisis Bibliometriks, COVIS-19.
References
Alok, S., Kumar, N., & Banerjee, S. (2022). Vigour and exhaustion for employees working from home: the mediating role of need for structure satisfaction. International Journal of Manpower. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-04-2022-0168
Azizah, S. N., Wahyuningsi, S., Dharma, D., & Kebumen, P. (2020). Flexible Working Space (FWS) Solusi Kerja New Normal di Indonesia. Jurnal E-Bis (Ekonomi-Bisnis), 4(2), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.37339/jurnal
Chang, Y., Chien, C. J., & Shen, L. F. (2023). Teleworking during the COVID-19 pandemic: a leader-member exchange perspective. Evidence-Based HRM, 11(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-10-2021-0220
Chaudhuri, R., Chatterjee, S., Vrontis, D., & Alessio, I. (2022). Work from anywhere and employee psychological well-being: moderating role of HR leadership support. Personnel Review, 51(8), 1967–1989. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2022-0086
Chung, G., Lanier, P., & Wong, P. Y. J. (2022). Mediating Effects of Parental Stress on Harsh Parenting and Parent-Child Relationship during Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic in Singapore. Journal of Family Violence, 37(5), 801–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10896-020-00200-1/TABLES/3
Do, T. T., Thi Tinh, P., Tran-Thi, H. G., Bui, D. M., Pham, T. O., Nguyen-Le, V. A., & Nguyen, T. T. (2021). Research on lifelong learning in Southeast Asia: A bibliometrics review between 1972 and 2019. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1994361. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1994361
EY Indonesia PR Team. (2021). Majority of surveyed Southeast Asia (SEA) employees prefer not to return to pre-COVID-19 ways of working. https://www.ey.com/en_id/news/2021/07/majority-of-surveyed-southeast-asia-sea-employees-prefer-not-to-return1
Glänzel, W., & Moed, H. F. (2002). State-of-the-Art Report Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. In Budapest Scientometrics (Vol. 53, Issue 2). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Harunavamwe, M., & Kanengoni, H. (2023). Hybrid and virtual work settings; the interaction between technostress, perceived organisational support, work-family conflict and the impact on work engagement. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEMS-07-2022-0306
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a
International Labor Organization. (2022). Asia-Pacific Employment and Social Outlook Rethinking sectoral strategies for a human-centred future of work 2022. https://doi.org/10.54394/EQNI6264
Iqbal, K. M. J., Khalid, F., & Barykin, S. Y. (2021). Hybrid workplace: The future of work. In Handbook of Research on Future Opportunities for Technology Management Education (pp. 28–48). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8327-2.ch003
Irawanto, D. W., Novianti, K. R., & Roz, K. (2021). Work from Home: Measuring Satisfaction between Work–Life Balance and Work Stress during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. Economies 2021, Vol. 9, Page 96, 9(3), 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECONOMIES9030096
Jeffrey Hill, E., Jacob Erickson, J., Holmes, E. K., Ferris, M., Jeffrey, E., & Jacob, J. (2010). Workplace Flexibility, Work Hours, and Work-Life Conflict: Finding an Extra Day or Two. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(3), 349–358. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019282
Mariani, M., Wamba, S. F., Castaldo, S., & Santoro, G. (2023). The rise and consolidation of digital platforms and technologies for remote working: Opportunities, challenges, drivers, processes, and consequences. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113617
Martin, B. H., & MacDonnell, R. (2012). Is telework effective for organizations?: A meta-analysis of empirical research on perceptions of telework and organizational outcomes. Management Research Review, 35(7), 602–616. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171211238820
Moed, H. F., & Halevi, G. (2015). Multidimensional assessment of scholarly research impact. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(10), 1988–2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23314
Naqshbandi, M. M., Kabir, I., Ishak, N. A., & Islam, M. Z. (2023). The future of work: work engagement and job performance in the hybrid workplace. Learning Organization. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-08-2022-0097
OECD. (2021). Teleworking in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Trends and Prospects. https://doi.org/10.1787/0a76109f-en
Penfield, T., Baker, M. J., Scoble, R., & Wykes, M. C. (2014). Assessment, evaluations, and definitions of research impact: A review. In Research Evaluation (Vol. 23, Issue 1, pp. 21–32). https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvt021
Peters, P., & Batenburg, R. (2015). Telework adoption and formalisation in organizations from a knowlegde transfer perspective. International Journal of Work Innovation, 1(3), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJWI.2015.074169
Pham-Duc, B., Tran, T., Trinh, T.-P.-T., Nguyen, T.-T., Nguyen, N.-T., & Le, H.-T.-T. (2020). A spike in the scientific output on social sciences in Vietnam for recent three years: Evidence from bibliometric analysis in Scopus database (2000–2019). Journal of Information Science, 48(5), 623–639. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551520977447
Shockley, K. M., & Allen, T. D. (2007). When flexibility helps: Another look at the availability of flexible work arrangements and work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71(3), 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVB.2007.08.006
Suh, A., & Lee, J. (2017). Understanding teleworkers’ technostress and its influence on job satisfaction. Internet Research, 27(1), 140–159. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-06-2015-0181
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Verma, A., Venkatesan, M., Kumar, M., & Verma, J. (2023). The future of work post Covid-19: key perceived HR implications of hybrid workplaces in India. In Journal of Management Development (Vol. 42, Issue 1, pp. 13–28). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-11-2021-0304
Yang, E., Kim, Y., & Hong, S. (2023). Does working from home work? Experience of working from home and the value of hybrid workplace post-COVID-19. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 25(1), 50–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-04-2021-0015
Yap, C. S., & Tng, H. (1990). Factors associated with attitudes towards telecommuting. Information & Management, 19(4), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(90)90032-D
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629