IMPLIKASI CURRENT ACCOUNT SAVINGS ACCOUNT (CASA), BIAYA OPERASIONAL DAN PENDAPATAN OPERASIONAL (BOPO) DAN NON-INTEREST INCOME TERHADAP PROFITABILITAS BANK UMUM

Fajar Andrianto; Wiliam Santoso; Fahrul Riza; Haikal Andrean

doi:10.31539/costing.v7i6.12578

Fajar Andrianto Universitas Ciputra Surabaya
Wiliam Santoso Universitas Ciputra Surabaya
Fahrul Riza Universitas Ciputra Surabaya
Haikal Andrean Universitas Ciputra Surabaya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31539/costing.v7i6.12578

Keywords: Bank, profitability, CASA, BOPO, ROA

Abstract

Indonesia's banking sector has grown significantly and is considered one of the largest in Southeast Asia. This is demonstrated by the fact that three Indonesian banks are among the ten largest banks in Southeast Asia by market capitalization. The banking sector is currently facing increasing competition from national banks and foreign bank branches, as well as fintech. In assessing banking performance, profitability is very important. Variables such as Current Account Savings Account (CASA), Operating Expenses to Operating Income (BOPO), and Non-Interest Income affect bank profitability (ROA). This study investigates the effect of CASA, BOPO, and Non-Interest Income (NII) on the profitability of commercial banks in Indonesia. Using the purposive sampling method to select the data sample, this study concentrates on ten banks that belong to Bank Group based on Tier 1 Capital (KBMI) 3 and 4. This study aims to gain a deeper understanding of the variables that affect bank profitability in the context of the Indonesian financial market. This study uses multiple linear regression to analyze the independent variables CASA, BOPO, and non-interest income, and the dependent variable Return on Assets (ROA). The results show that the value of the CASA variable has no direct impact on the value of the ROA variable, the value of the BOPO variable has a negative impact on the value of the ROA variable, and the value of the NII variable has no direct impact on the value of the ROA variable. The results of this study are expected to provide a broader picture for banking management and investors about things that need to be considered related to the variables tested in this study.

Keywords: Bank, profitability, CASA, BOPO, ROA

References

Akmalia, A., Dio, K., & Hesty, N. (2017). Pengaruh kinerja keuangan terhadap nilai perusahaan dengan corporate social responsibility dan good corporate governance sebagai variabel pemoderasi (studi empiris pada perusahaan manufaktur di bursa efek indonesia periode 2010-2015). Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis, 8(2), 200–221.
Ambarsari, R., & Hermanto, S. B. (2017). Pengaruh ukuran perusahaan, pertumbuhan penjualan, profitabilitas, struktur aktiva, likuiditas terhadap struktur modal. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Riset Akuntansi (JIRA), 6(3).
Ardiansyah, F. A. , & Y. S. (n.d.). Analisis Pengaruh Kredit Bermasalah (NPL), Current Account Saving Account (CASA) dan Likuiditas (LDR) Terhadap Profitabilitas (ROA) Pada Perusahaan Perbankan Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Pada Tahun 2019-2021. Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University.
Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2006). Dasar-dasar manajemen keuangan.
DwiSastrawan, I. M., & Suaryana, I. G. N. A. (2016). Pengaruh langsung dan tidak langsung good corporate governance terhadap pengungkapan tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan.
Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi analisis multivariete dengan program IBM SPSS 23.
Kristianti, I., & Tulenan, M. V. (2021). Dampak financial technology terhadap kinerja keuangan perbankan. Kinerja: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Manajemen, 18(1), 57–65.
Lisnawati, L. (2020). Pengaruh Intellectual Capital dan Non Interest Income Terhadap Kesehatan Bank Syariah Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2015-2019. International Journal Accounting Tax and Business, 1(01), 45–67.
Lufianda, P. (2023). Pengaruh CAR, NPF, FDR dan BOPO Terhadap Profitabilitas (ROA) pada Bank Umum Syariah (Studi Kasus: Bank Syariah yang Terdaftar di OJK 2018-2022). Jurnal Ekonomi Trisakti, 3(2), 3243–3254.
Maulana, P., Dwita, S., & Helmayunita, N. (2021). Pengaruh CAR, NPL, LDR dan BOPO Terhadap Return ON Assets (ROA) pada Bank yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2017-2019. Jurnal Eksplorasi Akuntansi, 3(2), 316–328.
Pradana, M. A. (2023). Asas Ultimum Remedium dalam Putusan Surat Dakwaan Batal Demi Hukum pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Pajak (Studi Kasus Putusan No.31/Pid.B/2020/PN.Pwt). Universitas Jenderal Soedirman.
Priono, A. , & P. I. R. D. (2019). ANALISIS PERBEDAAN FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG BERPENGARUH TERHADAP PROFITABILITAS BANK KONVENSIONAL DAN BANK SYARIAH DI INDONESIA (Studi pada Bank Umum Konvensional dan Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia Periode Tahun 2011-2018). UniversitasDiponegoro.
Saputra, I., & Budiasih, I. (2016). Pengaruh kecukupan modal, risiko kredit, biaya operasional pendapatan operasional pada profitabilitas bank. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 14(3), 2363–2378.
Sukmawati, N. M. E. , & P. I. B. A. (2016). engaruh Pertumbuhan Dana Pihak Ketiga, Pertumbuhan Kredit, Risiko Kredit, Likuiditas, Dan Kondisi Ekonomi Terhadap Profitabilitas. Udayana University.
Syahrir, L. O., Nurdin, A. A., Heryanto, H. K., & Syarief, M. E. (2023). Pengaruh CASA, FDR, CAR, dan Inflasi terhadap ROA pada Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia. Journal of Applied Islamic Economics and Finance, 3(2), 275–285.
Yudha, A., Chabachib, M., & Pangestuti, I. R. D. (2017). Analysis of the effect of NPL, NIM, Non Interest Income, and LDR toward ROA with size as control variables (differences study on domestic and foreign banks listed on BEI period 2010-2015). Jurnal Bisnis Strategi, 26(2), 100–113.