PENGARUH PRODUK, SUMBER DAYA MANUSIA, LOKASI DAN BUKTI FISIK TERHADAP CITRA INSTITUSI DAN IMPLIKASINYA PADA KEPUTUSAN SISWA DALAM MEMILIH PERGURUAN TINGGI SWASTA DI PURWAKARTA

Fachmi Imannur Anwar; Djuni Akbar; Agus Supriyadi; Agus Buntoro

doi:10.31539/costing.v7i6.13234

Fachmi Imannur Anwar Manajemen Bisnis, STIEB Perdana Mandiri, Purwakarta
Djuni Akbar Politeknik Negeri jakarta, Depok
Agus Supriyadi Politeknik Negeri jakarta, Depok
Agus Buntoro Politeknik Negeri jakarta, Depok

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31539/costing.v7i6.13234

Keywords: Kata Kunci : Perguruan Tinggi, Product, People, Place, Physical Evidence, Corporate Image, Keputusan dalam memilih Perguruan tinggi swasta

Abstract

This study aims to analyze students' decisions in choosing private universities in Purwakarta, especially at the High School of Economics and Business Perdana Mandiri Purwakarta. Product, People, Place and Physical Evidance belonging to the High School of Economics and Business of Perdana Mandiri Purwakarta become Exogenous variable of research while Corporate image and Purchasing Decision serve as Endogen variable. In this research the sampling method used is non-probabilistic sampling. From the population of 11,770 high school / equivalent students consisting of 46 SMA and 23 SMK in purwakarta district. In this study the authors used a structural equation model (SEM). The result of the research shows that there is a significant correlation between exogenous variables and endogenous variables either partially or simultaneously, partially. The effect of P1 on BI through P2, P3, and P4 is 14.5%. The effect of P2 on BI through P1, P3, and P4 is 35.0%. The influence of P3 on BI through P1, P2, and P4 is 11.9%. The effect of P4 on BI through P1, P2, and P3 is 25.1%, while simultaneously the effect of exogenous variables on Endogenous variables (Institutional Image) with total influence of 86.5%. Partially, the relationship between exogenous variables and endogenous variables (purchase decision). The effect of P1 on KP through BI is 12.4%. The effect of P2 on KP through BI is 25.4%. The effect of P3 on KP through BI is 12.4 %, Effect of P4 to KP through BI is 19.2%, while simultaneous influence on Endogen variable (Purchase Decision) of 69,4%.

References

[1] Al-Hawary and Batayneh.(2010). The Effect Of Marketing Communication Tools On Non-Jordanian Students’Choice Of Jordanian Public Universities: A Field Study. Vol. 6 No. 2. 2010
[2] Alma,Buchari dan Ratih Huriyati.(2008).Manajemen Corporate & Strategi Pemasaran Jasa Pendidikan fokus pada mutu dan layanan prima.Bandung Alfabeta
[3] Arif Hartono.(2012). Information Requirements In The Selection Of Indonesian Higher Education Institutions: Evidence From Education Expo Visitors.Vol 2 No 09
[4] Bungin,Burhan.(2005). Metodelogi Penelitian Kuantitaif.Jakarta.Kencana Prenamedia Group
[5] Calkins and welki.(2006). Factors That Influence Choice OfMajor: Why Some Students NeverConsider Economics. Vol. 33 No. 8.2006
[6] Creswell, John.(2010). Reserch Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed.Yogyakarta.Pustaka Pelajar
[7] Dalci et. al.(2013). Factors That Influence IranianStudents’ Decision To ChooseAccounting Major. Volume 3 No.2.2013
[8] Elfrida Manoku.(2015).Factors That Influence UniversityChoice Of Albanian Students. Vol.11, No.16.2015
[9] Emanuela Maria.(2010). Higher Education Student Choice Influencing Factors. Vol. 1 No. 3.2010
[10] Hair jr,joseph.F,dkk.2009.Multivariate Data Analysis Seventh Edition
[11] Haryono,Siswoyo.2017.Metode SEM untuk penelitian Manajemen AMOS LISREL PLS.Jakarta.Luxima Metro Media
[12] http://forlap.ristekdikti.go.id/perguruantinggi/homegraphpt
[13] http://stieb-perdanamandiri.ac.id/index.php/polibisnis/view/35
[14] http://www.kopertis12.or.id/2015/09/29/daftar-nama-perguruan-tinggi-non-aktif-per-29-september-2015.html
[15] http://www.purwakartakab.go.id/
[16] Joseph Sia Kee Ming.(2010). Institutional Factors Influencing Students’ College Choice Decision In Malaysia:A Conceptual Framework. Vol. 1 No. 3.2010
[17] Khanfar.(2015). The Effect of Promotion Mix Elements on Consumers Buying Decisions of Mobile Service: The case of Umniah Telecommunication Company at
[18] Kotler,Keller..2009. Manajemen Pemasaran jilid I.Jakarta. Erlangga
[19] Kusumawati et.al.(2010). Exploring Student Choice Criteria For Selecting AnIndonesian Public University: A PreliminaryFinding. Preliminary Finding. ANZMAC 2010 Doctoral Colloquium (pp. 1-27)
[20] Leylana.et.all.Pengaruh Service Marketing Mix (Bauran Pemasaran Jasa) Terhadap Citra Merek Dan Dampaknya Pada Keputusan Pembelian (Survei Pada Peserta Lembaga Kursus Dan Pelatihan Royal English Toefl & Toeic Center Malang).Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis Vol. 24 No. 1
[21] Lien.et.all.(2015). Factors Influencing VNU-IS Students’ Choice Of University. Vol. 31, No. 4.2015
[22] Lonela and George.(2014)..A Model Of StudentsUniversity Decision MakingBehavior. Volume II, Issue 3.2014
[23] Lonela and George.(2014). Educational Marketing:Factors Influencing The Selection Of A University. Volume II, Issue 3.2014
[24] Navrátilová Tereza.(2013). Analysis And Comparison Of Factors Influencing
[25] Nurdianto dan Yuniati.(2013).Pengaruh Kualitas Produk Dan Citra Sebagai Variabel Intervening Terhadap Keputusan Konsumen Dalam Membeli Motor Honda.Vol. 2 No. 10.2013
[26] Oosterbeek, Hessel;Groot, Wim;Hartog, Joop.1992. An Empirical Analysis of University Choice and Earnings. De Economist; 1992; 140, 3; ProQuest
[27] pg. 293
[28] Praboyo and Soedarsono.2015. Influential Factors In Choosing Higher Education Institution: A Case Study Of A Private University In Surabaya. Vol. 9, No. 1
[29] Prattana Thongplean.2012. Service Marketing Mix Factors Affecting Customers Decision On Choosing A Beauty Salon. Srinakharinwirot University
[30] Rayfiel.et.all.2013. Factors That Influence Student DecisionsTo Enroll In A College Of AgricultureAnd Life Sciences. NACTA Journal • March
[31] Riadi, Edi.2015.Statiska Penelitian.Jakarta.Andi
[32] Shepherd Mupemhi.(2013). Factors Influencing Choice Of A University By Students In Zimbabwe. Vol. 7(36), pp. 3723-3729.(2013)
[33] Simon and Taylor.(2011).Career History And Motivations For Choosing LIS: A Case Study. Vol. 60 No. 9.2011
[34] Tirtarahardja,Umar dan La sulo.(2012).Pengantar Pendidikan.Jakarta. Rineka Cipta
[35] Ulkhaq. Al.(2016).Assessing Campus Sustainability A Report From Dipenogoro University. Vol. 6, No. 8.2016
[36] Undang Undang Republik Indonesia No.14 Tahun 2005 Tentang Guru dan Dosen
[37] University Choice. Vol. 5, Issue 3, pp. 90-100
[38] Wantanee Embanrung.(2012). Service Marketing Mix Factors Affecting Decision Making Of Trainees In Choosing Private Massage Training Schools In Bangkok. Srinakharinwirot University.2012
[39] Wildman.et.all.(2002). Factors Influencing Choice Of Major In Agriculture. NACTA Journal; Sep 2002; 46, 3; ProQuest Zarqa city- Jordan. Vol 6 No 5.2002