LEVERAGING AI IN HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYTICS: ETHICAL AND SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY STANDPOINT OF ATS (APPLICANT TRACKING SYSTEM) IN HUMAN RESOURCES OPERATION & RECRUITMENT PROCESS

Authors

  • Muhammad Daffa Adjisena Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Anggara Wisesa Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Dedy Sushandoyo Institut Teknologi Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31539/costing.v7i6.13770

Keywords:

AI-driven Recruitment, Ethical Implications, Transparency, Bias Mitigation, Inclusivity, Utilitarian Ethics, Governance Frameworks

Abstract

ABSTRACT

This research explores the ethical implications of AI-driven video interview technologies in recruitment, focusing on transparency, bias, inclusivity, and equity. Using thematic analysis of qualitative data from interviews with candidates and recruiters, the study identifies key ethical concerns and examines them through thear lenses of Jeremy Bentham’s utilitarian ethics and UNESCO’s Ethical AI Principles. Findings highlight significant challenges, including the lack of transparency in AI evaluation criteria, systemic biases disadvantaging underrepresented groups, and the impersonal nature of AI interactions. Additionally, governance gaps, such as risks of data misuse and accountability issues, underscore the need for robust safeguards. The study proposes a comprehensive business solution to address these challenges. Recommendations include enhancing transparency through clear communication and feedback mechanisms, mitigating biases with diverse training datasets and regular audits, and adopting hybrid recruitment models that balance AI efficiency with human empathy. Customizing AI systems to accommodate diverse candidate profiles and implementing governance frameworks, such as GDPR, further ensure ethical compliance and inclusivity. By aligning these solutions with utilitarian ethics, which emphasize maximizing societal benefits and minimizing harm, and UNESCO’s principles of accountability, inclusivity, and human agency, this research offers a roadmap for ethical AI deployment in recruitment. It concludes that a balanced approach integrating technical advancements and human oversight is essential for creating recruitment processes that are fair, transparent, and inclusive, ultimately fostering trust and enhancing the candidate experience.

References

Al-Zu’bi, B. M., Ababneh, A., Alta-rawneh, F., & Alrida, N. (2024). Bentham's utilitarianism ethical theory and its application in the triage system: A scholarly philo-sophical paper. Jordan Journal of Nursing Research, 3(3), 1-6.
Bentham, J. (1789). An introduction to the principles of morals and legis-lation. London: Clarendon Press.
Bogen, M., & Rieke, A. (2018). Help wanted: An examination of hiring algorithms, equity, and bias. Washington, DC: Upturn.
BPS Indonesia. (2020). Workforce de-mographics report. Jakarta: BPS Indonesia.
Dastin, J. (2018). Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. Reuters. Re-trieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-jobs-automation-insight-idUSKCN1MK08G
Hunkenschroer, A., & Kriebitz, A. (2022). Is AI recruiting (un)ethical? A human rights per-spective on the use of AI for hir-ing. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01299-4
Hunkenschroer, A., & Luetge, C. (2022). Ethics of AI-enabled re-cruiting and selection: A review and research agenda. AI & Ethics, 2(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00094-5
Hunt, V., Yee, L., Prince, S., & Dixon-Fyle, S. (2018). Delivering through diversity. McKinsey & Company. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com
Linklater, M. (2024). Governance of AI in ASEAN: Regulatory gaps and opportunities. Southeast Asian Re-view of AI Ethics, 5(1), 24-39.
McKinsey & Company. (2019). The fu-ture of Asia: Unleashing the poten-tial of AI and automation. Re-trieved from https://www.mckinsey.com
Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fair-ness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3457607
Mori, K., Nakashima, T., & Yamakawa, Y. (2024). A systematic literature review on artificial intelligence in recruiting and selection: A matter of ethics. Journal of Business Eth-ics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05124-7
O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math de-struction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democra-cy. New York: Crown Publishing.
Raghavan, M., Barocas, S., Kleinberg, J., & Levy, K. (2020). Mitigating bias in algorithmic hiring: Evaluat-ing claims and practices. Proceed-ings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 469–481. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372828
Retorio. (2020). AI video interview tech-nologies: Benefits and limitations. Retrieved from https://www.retorio.com
Shell. (2023). AI and talent acquisition: Case study. HR & AI Journal, 5(2), 45–58.
Turobov, A., Alvarado, R., & Singer, J. (2024). Enhancing qualitative re-search using ChatGPT. Research Methods Quarterly, 12(1), 34–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1234567890
UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. Re-trieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org
URL: https://doi.org/10.14525/JJNR.v3i3.02

Downloads

Published

2024-12-22