MENINGKATKAN PENGELOLAAN EMISI METANA DI SEKTOR HULU MINYAK DAN GAS: STRATEGI PENYELARASAN PERTAMINA HULU ENERGI DENGAN KERANGKA KERJA OGMP 2.0

Authors

Jimmy Permadi Institut Teknologi Bandung
Utomo Sarjono Putro Institut Teknologi Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31539/costing.v8i3.15432

Keywords:

Methane Emissions, Emission Management, OGMP 2.0, Analytic Hierarchy Process, Pertamina Hulu Energi

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengevaluasi dan mengembangkan strategi pengelolaan emisi metana di Pertamina Hulu Energi (PHE), dengan mengacu pada standar internasional yang diatur dalam Oil and Gas Methane Partnership (OGMP) 2.0. Menggunakan pendekatan kombinasi kualitatif dan kuantitatif melalui gap analysis dan Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), penelitian ini mengidentifikasi area perbaikan utama dalam sistem pengukuran, pelaporan, dan verifikasi (MRV), serta dalam penetapan target reduksi emisi metana. Analisis menunjukkan bahwa strategi "OGMP 2.0 Alignment" merupakan alternatif terbaik dengan skor tertinggi dibandingkan "Basic Compliance" dan "Gold Standard". Strategi ini memungkinkan implementasi pengukuran langsung secara selektif pada aset prioritas tinggi, sambil secara bertahap memperkuat tata kelola dan kapasitas internal. Hasil penelitian menyarankan pembentukan tim khusus pengelolaan metana, pemanfaatan pendanaan internasional, serta pengembangan kerangka kerja analisis biaya-manfaat. Penelitian ini memberikan implikasi praktis untuk membantu PHE memenuhi standar internasional, meningkatkan transparansi pelaporan, serta memperkuat posisi dalam pasar karbon global.

References

ASEAN Centre for Energy. (2025). Scoping methane emissions in ASEAN’s oil and gas sector. ASEAN Centre for Energy. Retrieved from https://aseanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Scoping-Methane-Emissions-in-ASEANs-Oil-and-Gas-Sector_Report.pdf

Chauhan, A., et al. (2024). ADNOC’s strategic methane management: Achieving net-zero emissions through innovative technologies. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 221, Article 110634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2024.110634

Climate and Clean Air Coalition [CCAC]. (2020). Oil and Gas Methane Partnership (OGMP) 2.0 Reporting Framework. United Nations Environment Programme. Retrieved from https://ogmpartnership.com

Gurel, E., & Tat, M. (2017). SWOT analysis: A theoretical review. Journal of International Social Research, 10(51), 994–1006.

Hamdy, O., et al. (2024). Methane management in upstream oil and gas: Technological advancements and best practices. Environmental Science & Technology, 58(3), 1056–1068. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c07234

International Association of Oil & Gas Producers [IOGP]. (2025). Recommended practices for methane emissions detection and quantification technologies – Upstream. IOGP. Retrieved from https://www.iogp.org/recommended-practices

International Energy Agency [IEA]. (2021). Curtailing methane emissions from fossil fuel operations. IEA. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/reports/curtailing-methane-emissions-from-fossil-fuel-operations

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The physical science basis. IPCC. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1

Macci, S., et al. (2024). Enhancing methane emissions reporting accuracy: Case studies from Eni SpA. Atmospheric Environment, 298, Article 119847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.119847

Methane Guiding Principles. (2024). Best practices and methane reduction targets. Retrieved from https://methaneguidingprinciples.org/best-practices

OECD. (2024). Methane abatement in developing countries: Regulations, incentives, and finance. OECD Development Policy Tools. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/ab8a19f6-en

Pertamina. (2025). Pertamina Hulu Energi sustainability report 2025. Pertamina. Retrieved from https://sustainability.pertamina.com

Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590

United Nations Development Programme [UNDP]. (2021). Catalyzing private investment in methane abatement projects. UNDP. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/publications/catalyzing-private-investment-methane-abatement-projects

United Nations Environment Programme [UNEP]. (2020). Oil and Gas Methane Partnership (OGMP) 2.0 Framework. UNEP. Retrieved from https://www.unep.org/resources/report/oil-and-gas-methane-partnership-ogmp-20-framework

Weihrich, H. (1982). The TOWS matrix—A tool for situational analysis. Long Range Planning, 15(2), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(82)90120-0

World Bank. (2022). Financing methane mitigation: A policy toolkit. World Bank. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/financing-methane-mitigation-policy-toolkit