PENGARUH AGILE WORKING TERHADAP TEAM PERFORMANCE DENGAN PROACTIVITY NORMS SEBAGAI VARIABEL MEDIASI (STUDI PADA KARYAWAN TETAP PADA PERUSAHAAN INDUSTRI TEKNOLOGI YANG TERDAFTAR DI BEI DAN BERLOKASI DI DKI JAKARTA)

Authors

Tannya Lulani Daveisha Universitas Indonesia
Eva Andayani Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

Keywords:

Kerja Agile, Tugas Agile, Kerja Tim Agile, Norma Proaktif, Kinerja Tim

Abstract

Cara kerja yang serba cepat menjadi pendekatan penting bagi organisasi untuk tetap kompetitif di era perubahan bisnis yang cepat. Penelitian ini menganalisis pengaruh metode kerja agile (Agile Taskwork dan Agile Teamwork) terhadap kinerja tim, serta mengevaluasi peran norma-norma proaktif sebagai mediator. Data dikumpulkan melalui survei terhadap 291 karyawan tetap di perusahaan teknologi yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) dan berlokasi di DKI Jakarta. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif dengan analisis SEM-PLS menggunakan SmartPLS. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa metode kerja agile berpengaruh positif terhadap kinerja tim, dengan norma-norma proaktif berperan signifikan sebagai mediator. Responden menunjukkan tanggapan positif, meskipun variabel kinerja tim memiliki nilai rata-rata terendah. Penelitian ini menyoroti pentingnya penerapan metode kerja agile dalam menciptakan lingkungan kerja adaptif dan kolaboratif, khususnya di industri teknologi. Dengan memperkuat norma-norma proaktif, organisasi dapat mengoptimalkan kinerja tim dalam menghadapi tantangan pasar yang dinamis..

References

Aghina, W. (2021). The impact of agility: How to shape your organization to compete. McKinsey Quarterly.

Bakker, A.B., & Demerouti, E. (2016). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273-285.

Barker, J. R. (1993). Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 408-437.

Cai, W., Parker, S. K., Chen, Z., & Lam, W. (2019). "How Does the Social Context Fuel the Proactive Fire? A Multilevel Review and Theoretical Synthesis," Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(2), 209-230.

Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the Performance Prediction Problem in Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Dalam M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 1, hal. 687-732). Consulting Psychologists Press.

Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H., & Sager, C. E. (1993). A Theory of Performance. Dalam N. Schmitt, W. C. Borman, & Associates (Ed.), Personnel Selection in Organizations (hal. 35-70). Jossey-Bass.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.

Dingsøyr, T., Moe, N. B., & Faegri, T. E. (2018). Exploring agile team effectiveness: Findings from 18 focus groups in six companies. IEEE Software, 35(1), 23-29.

Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.

Ehrhart, M. G., & Naumann, S. E. (2004). Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Work Groups: A Group Norms Approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 960-974.

Fay, D., & Frese, M. (2001). The Concept of Personal Initiative: An Overview of Validity Studies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 178-189.

Gallup. (2022). State of the global workplace: 2022 report. Gallup Inc. Tersedia di: https://www.gallup.com/workplace/349484/state-of-the-global-workplace.aspx

Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A New Model of Work Role Performance: Positive Behavior in Uncertain and Interdependent Contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327-347.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson Education Limited.

Junker, T. L., Bakker, A. B., Gorgievski, M. J., & Derks, D. (2021). Agile Work Practices and Employee Proactivity: A Multilevel Study. Human Relations, 75(12), 2189-2217.

Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The Social Psychology of Organizations (edisi ke-2). Wiley. Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (7th ed.). Pearson.

KPMG. (2019). Organizational agility: Why agile transformation matters now. KPMG International.Deloitte. (2017). Agility in the Financial Services Industry. Deloitte Insights.

Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010). "Making Things Happen: A Model of Proactive Motivation and Behaviors," Journal of Management, 36(4), 827-856.

Patten, M. L., & Newhart, M. (2018). Understanding Research Methods: An Overview of the Essentials. Routledge.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach (7th ed.). Wiley.

Stray, V., Sjøberg, D. I. K., & Dybå, T. (2020). Stand-up meetings: A grounded theory study of daily meetings in agile software development. Journal of Systems and Software, 53(1), 1-14.

Thomas, A. M., & Otto, B. (2021). Measuring team performance in agile environments: A systematic review. International Journal of Project Management, 39(5), 1023-1035.

Ulrich, D. (1997). Human Resource Champions: The Next Agenda for Adding Value and Delivering Results. Harvard Business School Press.