BAGAI SERIGALA BERBULU DOMBA : TINJAUAN SISTEMATIS TENTANG PSEUDO – TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP DAN ARAH PENELITIAN MASA DEPAN

Salsabila Ramadhani Nugrohoputri

doi:10.31539/7sangy52

Authors

Salsabila Ramadhani Nugrohoputri Universitas Airlangga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31539/7sangy52

Keywords:

Pseudo – transformational leadership, Leadership, Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

Pseudo-transformational leadership merupakan sisi gelap dari kepemimpinan transformasional yang tampak karismatik, tetapi berlandaskan motivasi egoistik dan manipulatif. Fenomena ini ibarat “serigala berbulu domba” karena mampu menipu pengikut melalui retorika dan ilusi moralitas. Penelitian ini bertujuan meninjau secara sistematis literatur mengenai pseudo-transformational leadership dan merumuskan arah penelitian masa depan. Metode yang digunakan adalah Systematic Literature Review (SLR) berdasarkan protokol Tranfield et al. (2003) dengan pencarian pada basis data Scopus, menghasilkan 15 artikel relevan yang dianalisis terkait definisi, teori, metodologi, anteseden, dan konsekuensi. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa pseudo-transformational leadership berkaitan erat dengan kepribadian gelap, moral disengagement, serta budaya organisasi yang permisif terhadap perilaku tidak etis. Dampaknya meliputi penurunan kepercayaan, kepuasan kerja, dan keterlibatan, serta peningkatan turnover intention. Studi ini berkontribusi dengan memberikan pemetaan komprehensif mengenai pseudo-transformational leadership sekaligus menawarkan agenda riset baru melalui pendekatan longitudinal, multilevel, dan lintas budaya.

References

[1] Barling, J., Christie, A., & Turner, N. (2008). Pseudo-transformational leadership: Towards the development and test of a model. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(4), 851–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9552-8

[2] Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00016-8

[3] Christie, A., Barling, J., & Turner, N. (2011). Pseudo-transformational leadership: Model specification and outcomes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(12), 2943–2984. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00858.x

[4] Dasborough, M. T., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2002). Emotion and attribution of intentionality in leader–member relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 13(5), 615–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00147-9

[5] Hughes, P. J., & Harris, M. D. (2017). Organizational laundering: A case study of pseudo-transformational leadership. Organization Development Journal, 35(2), 59–77.

[6] Lengyel, G., & Ilonszki, G. (2012). Simulated democracy and pseudo-transformational leadership in Hungary. Historical Social Research, 37(1), 107–126.

[7] Lin, C.-S., Huang, P.-C., Chen, S.-J., & Huang, L.-C. (2017). Pseudo-transformational leadership is in the eyes of the subordinates. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(1), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2739-5

[8] O’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. A. (2020). Transformational leader or narcissist? How grandiose narcissists can create and destroy organizations and institutions. California Management Review, 62(3), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125620914989

[9] Palrecha, R., Spangler, W. D., & Yammarino, F. J. (2012). A comparative study of three leadership approaches in India. Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 146–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.012

[10 Syed, F., Naseer, S., Nawaz, J., & Shah, S. Z. A. (2021). When the victim becomes vicious: Combined effects of pseudo-transformational leadership and epistemic motivation on contempt and deviant behaviors. European Management Journal, 39(2), 236–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.07.005

[11] Tian, A. W., Meyer, J. P., Ilic-Balas, T., Espinoza, J. A., & Pepper, S. (2023). In search of the pseudo-transformational leader: A person-centered approach. Journal of Business Research, 158, 113675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113675