TRANSFORMASI DIGITAL PERADILAN: ANALISIS DAMPAK PENERAPAN E-COURT TERHADAP MANAJEMEN KINERJA DI PENGADILAN NEGERI BREBES

Imanuel Bambang Nugroho

doi:10.31539/j5895e23

Authors

Imanuel Bambang Nugroho Universitas Pancasakti Tegal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31539/j5895e23

Keywords:

Transformasi Digital, E-Court, Manajemen Kinerja, Beban Kerja, Studi Kualitatif

Abstract

Digitalisasi sistem peradilan melalui E-Court telah mulai mengubah pengelolaan peradilan, namun dampaknya terhadap manajemen kinerja staf belum banyak diteliti. Penelitian kualitatif ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dampak E-Court terhadap sistem manajemen kinerja, melalui perspektif petugas E-Court dan tenaga teknis di Pengadilan Negeri Brebes. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan wawancara mendalam, observasi, dan analisis dokumen, yang kemudian di analisis secara tematik. Temuan penelitian ini mengungkap hal-hal sebagai berikut: (1) adanya perubahan pola beban kerja yang disertai dengan double burden akibat duplikasi input, (2) sistem manajemen kinerja yang kaku dengan indikator yang tidak relevan dengan beban kerja digital, dan (3) ketimpangan antara kebijakan digital dan pengelolaan SDM yang memicu stresse. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan, untuk menjadikan sistem pengadilan digital memadai, sistem manajemen SDM harus disesuaikan dengan pengelolaan SDM. Sebagai rekomendasi praktis, penelitian ini mengusulkan pengembangan kerangka model manajemen kinerja adaptif.

References

[1] World Bank (2022). Digital Government for Development: A Review of World Bank Projects. World Bank Group.

[2] Janowski, T. (2019). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 456-465.

[3] Satriyo, B., Darmawan, A., & Prasetyo, H. (2023). Measuring the effectiveness of e-court implementation in Indonesian judicial system. Indonesian Journal of Law and Society, 4(1), 89-108.

[4] Chen, L., & Zhao, X. (2022). Digital transformation in judicial systems: A comparative study of e-court implementation. Journal of Legal Technology, 15(2), 45-62.

[5] Baker, J. (2020). The technology-organization-environment framework. In Information Systems Theory (pp. 231-245). Springer, New York, NY.

[6] Liu, Y., Liu, X., & Liu, J. (2021). Digital transformation and human resource management: A resource-based view. Human Resource Management Review, 31(4), 100782.

[7] Gupta, R., & Sharma, P. (2023). Digital fatigue in public sector organizations: An empirical investigation. Asian Journal of Public Administration, 41(1), 78-95.

[8] Williams, R., Brown, K., & Davis, M. (2022). Hidden workload in digital transformation: The unintended consequences. Public Administration Review, 82(4), 645-658.

[9] Siregar, D., & Wahyuni, S. (2023). The gap between technology adoption and HR readiness in Indonesian public sector. Indonesian Journal of Public Administration, 7(2), 123-140.

[10] Huang, M., & Chen, K. (2021). E-court implementation and its impact on judicial efficiency: Evidence from China. Journal of Law and Society, 48(3), 412-430.

[11] Park, J., Choi, S., & Lee, H. (2022). Technology acceptance in e-court systems: A cross-national study. Information Systems Frontiers, 24(2), 589-605.

[12] Lee, S., & Kim, J. (2023). Human resource challenges in digital court transformation. International Journal of Court Administration, 14(1), 25-41.

[13] Rodriguez, M., Smith, T., & Johnson, K. (2023). The impact of digital transformation on organizational performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 36(2), 234-251.

[14] Thompson, R., & White, G. (2022). Aligning performance management with digital transformation. Public Performance & Management Review, 45(3), 567-589.

[15] Zhang, L., Wang, M., & Chen, Y. (2023). Developing digital competency indicators for performance management systems. Journal of Human Resource Development, 40(2), 156-175.

[16] Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.

[17] Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

[18] Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., ... & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1893-1907.

[19] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage Publications.

[20] Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2020). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4.

[21] Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2021). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-13.

[22] Denzin, N. K. (2020). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Routledge.

[23] Carter, N., Bryant-Lukosius, D., DiCenso, A., Blythe, J., & Neville, A. J. (2021). The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41(5), 545-547.

[24] Tobin, G. A., & Begley, C. M. (2020). Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(4), 388-396.

[25] Korstjens, I., & Moser, A. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120-124.