PHYGITAL EXPERIENCE IN E-AUCTION SERVICES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON ITS EFFECTS ON CITIZEN SATISFACTION, TRUST, AND PARTICIPATION INTENTION

Authors

  • Deny Ariyanto Universitas Tanjungpura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31539/80y80s07

Keywords:

Phygital Experience; E-Auction; Service Quality; Citizen Satisfaction; Trust; Participation Intention

Abstract

This study conducts a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to synthesize current evidence on phygital experience, defined as the integration of physical and digital channels, in public e-auction services managed by the Directorate General of State Assets (DJKN). A structured search was performed through the Scopus database for publications between 2010 and 2024, using Boolean-based keywords related to phygital services, hybrid public service delivery, digital government, citizen satisfaction, trust, and participation intention. The review followed PRISMA 2020 procedures, resulting in the identification of 10 eligible studies out of the initial screening. The findings show that phygital experience improves transparency, accessibility, service reliability, and perceived fairness, which in turn significantly enhance citizen satisfaction, institutional trust, and participation intention in digital public services. Despite these positive outcomes, the literature reveals several gaps, including the lack of longitudinal evidence, limited focus on digital inclusivity, and inconsistent conceptual definitions of phygital experience. This study contributes by providing a synthesized conceptual understanding of phygital experience in the public sector, especially in high-stakes services such as e-auction. The results offer strategic guidance for designing more user-centered, inclusive, and trustworthy hybrid service models.

References

Acharya, R. (2010). Citizens’ expectations and satisfaction in public services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(3), 671–695.

Asmawanti, D., Putra, A., & Rahman, F. (2025). E-government quality and public value: A systematic review. Cogent Business & Management.

Baharon, H., Saidin, S. Z., & Abd Karim, N. S. (2017). Factors influencing citizen satisfaction with e-government portal in Malaysia. Government Information Quarterly, 34(3), 567–578.

Bahazar, R., & Leu, J.-D. (2019). Digital government and trust: Evidence from Indonesia. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 1–12.

Evans, D., & Yen, D. C. (2006). E-government: Evolving relationships of citizens and government, domestic and international. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), 207–235.

Ghazala Mansuri, G., & Rao, V. (2013). Can participation be induced? Some evidence from developing countries. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 16(2), 284–304.

Gupta, A. K. (2021). Institutional performance and citizen satisfaction in public administration. Public Administration Review, 81(2), 295–305.

Hakim, F., Khairunnisa, M., & Ramadhan, A. (2023). Factors influencing local government e-GovQual in Indonesia. e-Jurnal Apresiasi Ekonomi, 11(3), 598–609.

Heeks, R. (2003). Most eGovernment-for-development projects fail: How can risks be reduced? iGovernment Working Paper Series.

Lamsal, B. P., & Gupta, A. K. (2022). Citizen satisfaction with public service: What factors drive? Policy & Governance Review, 6(1), 78–89.

Magoutas, B., & Mentzas, G. (2010). Adaptive frameworks for monitoring citizen satisfaction in e-government. Electronic Government, 7(4), 345–363.

Nguyen, H., Andersen, J. G., & Jensen, T. (2024). Citizen engagement in public sector innovation: A case study from Denmark. European Public Administration Review.

Oliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer. McGraw-Hill.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.

Papadomichelaki, X., & Mentzas, G. (2012). E-government quality measurement. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 8(1), 68–88.

Pramuditha, H., Sunaryo, K., & Akbar, M. F. (2024). The relationship between e-government service quality, citizen satisfaction, and trust: Evidence from Serang City. Journal of Logistics, Informatics and Service Science, 11(8), 283–302.

Van de Walle, S. (2018). Explaining citizen satisfaction and dissatisfaction with public services. In E. Ongaro & S. Van Thiel (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of public administration and management (pp. 227–241). Palgrave Macmillan.

Van Ryzin, G. G. (2004). Expectations, performance, and citizen satisfaction with urban services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(3), 433–448.

Wang, Z. (2010). Citizens’ satisfaction with government performance in six Asian-Pacific giants. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 11(1), 51–67.

Zhang, J., Li, X., & Chen, Y. (2021). Expectancy-disconfirmation model and citizen satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Public Administration Review, 81(1), 16–29.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-04