THE IMPACT OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEMS ON PROFESSIONALISM AND ACCOUNTABILITY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS

Authors

  • Elvianus Laoli Sekolah tinggi Ilmu Kepolisian
  • Oscarius Yudhi Ari Wijaya Akademi Sekretari Dan Manajemen Indonesia Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31539/8cng5n63

Keywords:

Performance Appraisal, Police Professionalism, Accountability, Competency Framework.

Abstract

Performance appraisal systems are central instruments for managing human resources in policing organizations and are widely used to promote professionalism, ensure accountability, and improve operational outcomes. This paper presents a structured literature-review study that synthesizes empirical and conceptual research from the last ten years to examine how different appraisal models (e.g., competency-based appraisal, behaviorally anchored rating scales, and performance management systems) influence police officers’ professional conduct, ethical decision-making, and organizational accountability. Drawing on a purposive review of peer-reviewed studies, government reports, and practitioner evaluations, the study identifies mechanisms by which appraisal systems affect motivation, training uptake, supervisory feedback, disciplinary processes, and public trust. Evidence suggests that appraisal systems that combine objective performance indicators, competency frameworks, and transparent review processes enhance professionalism and accountability by aligning expectations, improving feedback quality, and creating clearer consequences for misconduct. However, the literature also reports limitations: poorly designed appraisal tools, politicized evaluations, weak oversight, and perceived unfairness can undermine morale and reduce legitimacy. The paper highlights contextual moderators such as organizational culture, leadership commitment, legal frameworks, and community oversight. Recommendations include adopting competency-based frameworks, embedding multi-source feedback, ensuring procedural fairness, linking appraisal outcomes to training and promotion, and strengthening external oversight mechanisms. The study contributes a consolidated view of contemporary evidence and a targeted research agenda for improving appraisal design in policing. Keywords: performance appraisal, police professionalism, accountability, competency-based appraisal.

References

Corbo Crehan, A. (2025). A new focus for accountability: enabling police to act well. Policing and Society.

Damayanti, A. S. (2025). Does job satisfaction mediate the effect of supervisor performance appraisal on police professionalism? Journal of Security and Human Studies.

Eliza, E. (2024). The influence of competency and professionalism on performance: Evidence from Indonesian civil service contexts. Mabuss Journal.

Earlyanti, N. (2023). The influence of organizational support, personality and professionalism on police OCB. Journal of Industrial and Management Studies.

Feys, Y. (2018). A state-of-the-art review on police accountability. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice.

Helfers, R. C. (2020). Prior discipline and performance among police officers: Does organizational fairness matter? Criminal Justice and Law Studies.

Jia, D., et al. (2025). Graduation-stage fitness as a predictor of operational readiness and BARS ratings. International Journal of Policing Research.

Johnson, L. (2015). [Methodological source on appraisal fairness]. (Used as background in multiple studies).

Karimullah, S. S. (2024). The dilemma between professionalism and political interests in police performance. Journal of Law and Judiciary.

Maphosa, T., Shumba, N., & Mutasa, R. (2021). An investigation into the effect of performance appraisal on police service delivery: The case of South Africa. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice.

Nababan, A. (2025). Assessment center effectiveness and police performance management. Journal of Governance and Public Service.

Ningsih, R. K. (2025). Critical review of police performance in upholding law and human rights. Journal of Legal Review.

Ohland, M. W., et al. (2012). Development of a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale for team-member contributions. Academy of Management Learning & Education. (Foundational BARS reference cited for method).

Overman, S. (2025). The emotional backlash of public accountability on policing practice. Journal of Administrative Behaviour.

Panuntun, B., & Runturambi, A. J. S. (2025). Reforming police human capital management: Competency-based appraisal systems — a systematic review (2020–2025). Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology.

Pena Justisia (2024). [Article on police career development policy and evaluation]. Pena Justisia Journal.

Polri / National Police Regulation analyses (2019–2024). (Various authors). Indonesian policing performance management reports.

Rachmat, F., Prasojo, E., & Muslim, M. A. (2025). Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales in the performance management system within centralized policing. Learning Gate Journal.

Research on Police Performance Appraisals: A comparative perspective. (2011–2020). (comparative works cited in contemporary reviews).

Sihombing, et al. (2022). Supervisory performance and police ethics: mediation and outcomes. Journal of Police Studies.

Simotwo, I. K. (2018). Effects of performance appraisal system on employees’ performance in National Police Service, Kenya. Repository thesis.

Sitepu, M. (2024). The influence of competency and professionalism on employee performance. Journal of Administration and Fiscal Management.

UNODC. (2019). Handbook on police accountability, oversight and integrity. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

Williams, T., & Barros, M. (2022). Indicators of police performance: Twenty years of analysis. Policing Trends and Reports.

Yustini, T. (2023). Critical factors for evaluating police human resources and performance appraisal. Journal of Law and Social Sciences.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-22