FROM FTA TO EXPORT EARNINGS: UNLOCKING INDONESIA’S EXPORT POTENTIAL TO CHILE THROUGH TRADE COMPLEMENTARITY, RCA, AND NTM MITIGATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31539/4t2sfr20Keywords:
IC-CEPA; Trade Intensity Index; Revealed Comparative Advantage; Hambatan Non-Tarif; Export Market PenetrationAbstract
This study aims to explain why trade intensity between Indonesia and Chile remains low despite the implementation of the Indonesia–Chile Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (IC-CEPA), which has provided zero-tariff access for 6,704 tariff lines since August 2019. Using a descriptive quantitative approach and secondary data from UNCOMTRADE, WITS, and UNCTAD TRAINS for the period 2019–2024, this study examines four integrated indicators: the Trade Intensity Index (TII), Trade Complementarity Index (TCI), Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA), and Export Market Penetration (EMP), complemented by an analysis of non-tariff measures (NTMs). The findings reveal that although Indonesian exports to Chile increased significantly to US$337.5 million in 2024, generating a record trade surplus of US$202 million, the TII remains low at 0.29 substantially below Peru’s TII of 0.61, despite Peru not having a free trade agreement with Indonesia. This paradox reflects a mismatch between strong structural potential and actual trade performance. While trade structures are highly complementary (TCI = 58.12) and Indonesia demonstrates strong competitiveness in key products such as cotton yarn (RCA = 77.40) and vegetable oils (RCA = 40.53), actual market penetration remains limited (EMP < 15%). This gap is primarily attributed to non-tariff barriers, particularly Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) measures and Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT), as well as the possible underutilization of Certificates of Origin (COOs). The novelty of this study lies in its first-time integration of these four indicators within an IC-CEPA diagnostic framework, shifting the analytical focus from aggregate export growth to micro-level, product specific constraints. The findings provide an evidence-based foundation for policy recommendations aimed at enhancing FTA utilization and transforming preferential tariff access into sustainable export earnings.
References
Baier, S. L., & Bergstrand, J. H. (2007). Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade? Journal of International Economics, 71(1), 72–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.02.005
Balassa, B. (1965). The theory of economic integration. Homewood, IL: RD Irwin Inc.
Ecel, A., Ahimbisibwe, G. M., Mugizi, T., Ssekiziyivu, B., & Gimbo, M. (2025). Agricultural trade dynamics in the TFTA: Assessing complementarity and comparative advantage. Competitiveness Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-11-2024-0231
Ibrahim, K. H., & Abdulaziz, S. (2018). Nigeria-India bilateral trade relations: An analysis of Trade Complementarity Index (TCI). SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3186729
Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia. (2023). IC-CEPA Indonesia Chile Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement. https://ftacenter.codeart.id/cfind/source/files/factsheet-ic-cepa.pdf
Krugman, P. R., Obstfeld, M., & Melitz, M. J. (2018). International economics: Theory and policy (11th ed.). Pearson.
Mai, H. G., & Bui, H. T. (2025). The impact of free trade agreements on foreign direct investment inflows: Evidence from next-generation agreements in Vietnam. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 22(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.22(3).2025.01
Mao, R., & Zhang, B. (2015). Export destination and export market penetration of the People’s Republic of China—Past and future. Asian Development Review.
Maryam, J., Banday, U. J., & Mittal, A. (2018). Trade intensity and revealed comparative advantage: An analysis of intra-BRICS trade. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 13(5), 1182–1195. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-09-2017-0365
Metrotvnews. (2025, October 16). Ketua GPEI: 23 FTA Indonesia perlu evaluasi tahunan. https://www.metrotvnews.com/read/nolicaqgz-ketua-gpei-23-fta-indonesia-perlu-evaluasi-tahunan
Rasbin. (2024). Proyeksi dampak Indonesia-Chile CEPA terhadap neraca perdagangan Indonesia. INFO Singkat. https://berkas.dpr.go.id/pusaka/files/info_singkat/Info%20Singkat-XVI-12-II-P3DI-Juni-2024-234.pdf
Salvatore, D. (2013). International economics.
Sidabutar, V. T. P. (2017). Kajian pengaruh kerjasama perdagangan Indonesia–Chile terhadap peningkatan perdagangan Indonesia di wilayah Asia-Pasifik. Jurnal Bisnis STRATEGI, 26(1), 39–61.
Tirto.id. (2019, August 12). Perjanjian dagang Indonesia-Chile berlaku, RI rilis 3 regulasi. https://tirto.id
trainsonline.unctad.org. (2025). Trains portal.
Urata, S. (2002). Globalization and the growth in free trade agreements. Asia-Pacific Review, 9(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13439000220141569
Wani, N. U. H., Rahman, A., Grover, V., Mirzakhidova, S., & Mirwais Rasa, M. (2024). Regional trade expansion opportunities in Central and South Asia: Exploring trade complementarity, diversification and similarity. Cogent Economics and Finance, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2024.2363461
WITS. (2025). World Integrated Trade Solution.
WTO. (2012). A practical guide to trade policy analysis. http://vi.unctad.org/tpa
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rahayu Kusumawati, Muh. Nurkhamid

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

