EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS BASED ON LEADERSHIP STYLE MEDIATED BY MOTIVATION

Authors

  • Fatkhuri Fatkhuri STIES Putera Bangsa Tegal
  • Dyah Handayani Dewi Universitas Nasional
  • Kevin Indajang Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Sultan Agung Pematangsiantar
  • Sri Sudiarti Universitas Cipasung Tasikmalaya
  • Novita Sari Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Sultan Agung Pematangsiantar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31539/yqmwe981

Keywords:

Leadership Style, Work Motivation, Employee Performance, Mediation Effect

Abstract

This study examines the effect of leadership style on employee performance with work motivation as a mediating variable. In modern organizational environments, leadership has been recognized as a critical determinant of employee performance. Effective leadership fosters a supportive work environment, enhances intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, and ultimately contributes to improved employee performance. Although numerous studies have explored the direct relationship between leadership and performance, few have rigorously assessed the mediating role of motivation using a large, representative sample. This study employed a quantitative approach using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) and surveyed 100 employees from various departments of PT KLM Tangerang to test the hypothesized relationship. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire and analyzed using regression and mediation analyses. The results indicate that leadership style significantly influences motivation, which in turn positively influences employee performance. Furthermore, motivation partially mediates the relationship between leadership style and performance, suggesting that leadership practices foster higher motivation, which improves performance outcomes. These findings corroborate recent literature demonstrating consistent positive effects of leadership and motivation on performance. This study contributes to organizational behavior theory by providing empirical evidence on the mediating mechanisms of motivation and offers practical implications for human resource management. Organizations should prioritize leadership development programs and motivational strategies to strengthen employee performance and organizational effectiveness.

References

Antonakis, J., Bastardoz, N., Liu, Y., & Schriesheim, C. A. (2016). What makes charismatic leaders charismatic? Academy of Management Review, 41(4), 575–600. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.038 charismatic leadership

Breevaart, K., & Bakker, A. B. (2018). Daily job demands and employee work engagement: The role of daily transformational leadership behavior. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 23(3), 338–349. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000082

Dewi, Dyah Handayani. (2024). Mengukur Pengaruh Kebijakan Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Manusia Berbasis Green Economy Terhadap Keberlanjutan Organisasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Edunomika, 8(2). 1-16. https://doi.org/10.29040/jie.v8i2.13765

Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004

Fitriyah, N., Sukasmono, T., Qomariyah, N., & Fawaid, M. (2024). The role of leadership style and work motivation in improving employee performance. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan, 12(2), 233–245.

Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. (2018). Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 501–529. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.012 ethical leadership

Locke, E. A., & Schattke, K. (2019). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Time for expansion and clarification. Motivation Science, 5(4), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000116

Miao, C., Humphrey, R. H., & Qian, S. (2018). A meta‐analysis of emotional intelligence and work attitudes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 90(2), 177–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12167

Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). Sage Publications.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Routledge.

Soedarmadi, Christy, NNA., & Dewi, Dyah Handayani. (2017). Peran Keamanan Kerja Dan Komitmen Organisasi Terhadap Turnover Intention Serta Dampaknya Pada Kinerja Karyawan (Studi pada Karyawan PT. Indotirta Jaya Abadi Semarang - AGUARIA). Jurnal Dinamika Sosial Budaya, 19(1,). 90-110

Syahfery, A., Romli, K., & Barusman, M. Y. S. (2025). The effect of leadership style and work motivation on employee performance. Journal of Management, Business, and Social Sciences, 4(1), 45–59.

Van Knippenberg, D. (2020). Leadership and identity: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101330

Yukl, G. (2018). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson Education.

Zhang, Y., & Bartol, K. M. (2019). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.480371 creativity

Zhu, W., Avolio, B. J., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2019). Moderating role of follower characteristics with transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 166–180.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31