DETERMINANT OF TAX AUDIT QUALITY WITH AUDIT ENVIRONTMENT AS MEDIATORS

Authors

  • Rio Eryco Vebriadi Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta
  • Sabaruddin Sabaruddin Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31539/v4zsb927

Keywords:

Tax Audit Quality; Audit Input Factors; Audit Process; Audit Environment; PLS-SEM

Abstract

This study examines the determinants of tax audit quality by integrating input, process, and output factors with environmental context as a mediating variable. Data were collected from 129 tax auditors in Jakarta using structured questionnaires and analyzed through PLS-SEM. Results indicate that all factors significantly influence audit quality, with environmental factors showing the strongest effect and acting as a partial mediator. These findings highlight the importance of regulatory clarity and organizational culture in strengthening technical and procedural components, offering practical insights for improving tax audit quality and compliance.

References

Al-Ababneh, M. M. (2020). Linking Ontology, Epistemology and Research Methodology. Science & Philosophy, 8(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.23756/sp.v8i1.500

Alhadi, I., & Nugrahanto, A. (2021). TAX AUDIT QUALITY: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF THE USE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, COMPETENCE, TASK COMPLEXITY AND TIME PRESSURE. Info Artha, 5(2), 75–92.

Angganis, R., Pahala, I., & Nasution, H. (2023). Pengaruh Kompetensi Pemeriksa Pajak, Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi dan Pengalaman Pemeriksa Pajak terhadap Kualitas Pemeriksaan Pajak. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Humanika, 13(1), 93–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jiah.v13i1.53920

Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., Beasley, M. S., & Hogan, C. E. (2017). Auditing and assurance services (16th Global Edition). Pearson London, UK.

Boučková, Markéta. (2015). Management Accounting and Agency theory. Procedia Economics and Finance, 25, 5–13.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage publications.

Duhoon, A., & Singh, M. (2023). Corporate tax avoidance: a systematic literature review and future research directions. LBS Journal of Management & Research, 21(2), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1108/lbsjmr-12-2022-0082

El Badlaoui, A., Cherqaoui, M., & Taouab, O. (2021). Output indicators of audit quality: A framework based on literature review. In Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance (Vol. 9, Issue 6, pp. 1405–1421). Horizon Research Publishing. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujaf.2021.090619

Fiki, O. :, Daris, T., Winarningsih, S., Devano, S., & Author, C. (2021). FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG BERPENGARUH TERHADAP KUALITAS PEMERIKSAAN PAJAK DI INDONESIA. BALANCE : JURNAL AKUNTANSI DAN BISNIS, 6(2), 91–102. http://jurnal.um-palembang.ac.id/balance

Francis, J. R. (2011). A framework for understanding and researching audit quality. Auditing, 30(2), 125–152. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50006

George, D. S., & Diavastis, I. (2015). Tax audit effectiveness in Greek firms: Tax auditors perceptions. Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 7(7), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.5897/jat2015.0186

Ghani, E. K., Abdul Azis, M. A., Shamsudin, N., & Ilias, A. (2021). Do Audit Case Selection, Supervision Monitoring and Auditors’ Characteristics Influence Tax Auditors’ Effectiveness? International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i9/10923

Henseler J, Ringle C, Sarstedt M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 43(1) 115-135

Hair, J. F. ., Hult, G. T. M. ., Ringle, C. M. ., & Sarstedt, Marko. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage.

Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

Handayani, L. P. D. S., & Darma, G. S. (2021). Pengaruh Kebijakan Pemeriksaan, Kebijakan Akses Informasi Keuangan dan Forensik Digital terhadap Kualitas Pemeriksaan Pajak. Syntax Literate ; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 6(3), 1260. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v6i3.1142

Indonesia. (2025). Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 15 Tahun 2025

Indradewa, R., Supriyatin, E., & Ali Iqbal, M. (2019). Analysis of auditor competencies and job satisfaction on tax audit quality moderated by time pressure (case study of Indonesian tax offices). International Journal of Business Excellence, 19(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbex.2019.10023220

International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2014). A FRAMEWORK FOR AUDIT QUALITY KEY ELEMENTS THAT CREATE AN ENVIRONMENT FOR AUDIT QUALITY. International Federation of Accountants.

Kholil, I. H., Kom Ir Eka Intan Kumala Putri, M., Sri Listyarini, M., & Ed, M. (2014). Konsep Dasar Sistem (1st ed.). Universitas Terbuka.

Knechel, R. W., Krishnan, G. V, Pevzner, M., Shefchik, L., & Velury, U. (2013). Audit Quality: Insights from the Academic Literature. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32 (Supplement 1), 385–421.

Mersha, S., Bedemo Belaye, A., & Bayissa Gobena, L. (2022). Determinants of Tax Audit Quality with Audit Process as the Mediator in Ethiopia: The Case of The Ministry of Revenues. In MANAGEMENT AND ACCOUNTING REVIEW (Vol. 21).

Montuori, A. (2011). Systems Approach. In Encyclopedia of Creativity, Second Edition, Two Volume Set (Vol. 2, pp. V2-414-V2-421). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375038-9.00212-0

Neri, L., & Russo, A. (2014). A FRAMEWORK FOR AUDIT QUALITY: CRITICAL ANALYSIS. Business and Management Review, 3(09), 25–30. http://www.businessjournalz.org/bmr

Rajgopal, S., Srinivasan, S., & Zheng, X. (2021). Measuring audit quality. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(2), 559–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-020-09570-9

Sadiah, I. S., & Rasmini, N. K. (2023). Job satisfaction moderate the effect of integrity, work experience, and organizational commitment on audit quality. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 10(2), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v10n2.2279

Setiabudhi, H., Suwono, M. A., Yudi, M. S., Setiawan, A., Karim, S., Hardani, P., & Duari, H. (2024). Analisis Data Kuantitatif dengan SmartPLS 4. Borneo Novelty Publishing. https://ebooks.borneonovelty.com/media/publications/588838-analisis-data-kuantitatif-dengan-smartpl-29069ce4.pdf

Sihotang, H. (2023). METODE PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF. Pusat Penerbitan dan Percetakan Buku Perguruan Tinggi Universitas Kristen Indonesia.

Sisyadi, B., & Widjaja, I. (2024). Pengaruh kompetensi, independensi, etika profesi auditor, budaya organisasi, dan gaya kepemimpinan terhadap kualitas audit. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan, 8(6), 1417–1428.

Sompong, A., Ussahawanitichakit, P., & Janjarasjit, S. (2017). Effects of strategic comprehensive Audit Process and Audit success of tax Auditors (TAs) in Thailand. AU-GSB E-Journal, 10(2), 17.

Sulaiman, N. A. (2018). Attributes and Drivers of Audit Quality: The Perceptions of Quality Inspectors in the UK. Asian Journal of Accounting & Governance, 10.

Syam, M. A., Ghozali, I., Adam, & Merawati, E. E. (2021). The antecedents of audit quality: The input-process-output factors. Accounting, 7(6), 1275–1286. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2021.4.012

Taib, A., Muhammad, I., & Hamid, S. A. (2024). A CRITICAL REVIEW OF TAX AUDIT QUALITY FACTORS: A RESEARCH SYNTHESIS. IBAF E-Proceedings, 11(1), 161–174. https://ibaf.usim.edu.my

Xiao, T., Geng, C., & Yuan, C. (2020). How audit effort affects audit quality: An audit process and audit output perspective. China Journal of Accounting Research, 13(1), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CJAR.2020.02.002

Downloads

Published

2026-03-07