TRANSMISI NILAI KEPEMIMPINAN ANTARGENERASI: STUDI PEMAHAMAN WARISAN PENDIRI CIPUTRA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31539/zq4ka510Keywords:
Kepemimpinan, Ciputra, Usaha KeluargaAbstract
Studi ini meneliti bagaimana para penerus dalam Grup Ciputra menafsirkan kembali dan mempertahankan nilai-nilai kepemimpinan kewirausahaan yang diperkenalkan oleh mendiang pendirinya, Dr. Ir. Ciputra. Meskipun nilai-nilai IPE—Integritas, Profesionalisme, dan Kewirausahaan—secara formal diinstitusionalisasikan, keberlanjutannya bergantung pada bagaimana para penerus menerjemahkan prinsip-prinsip ini ke dalam praktik nyata di sepanjang transisi generasi. Dengan menggunakan desain interpretatif kualitatif yang didasarkan pada teori pembuatan makna, penelitian ini menggunakan wawancara tidak terstruktur dengan empat pemimpin senior yang secara langsung dibimbing oleh Ciputra. Temuan mengungkapkan tiga proses yang saling terkait yang membentuk transmisi nilai: paparan pengalaman terhadap praktik pendiri, interpretasi reflektif yang menghasilkan makna kepemimpinan bersama, dan perwujudan nilai-nilai dalam pengambilan keputusan sehari-hari. Kontribusi utama adalah identifikasi hutang budi sebagai mekanisme relasional-moral yang memperdalam komitmen dan memperkuat internalisasi nilai-nilai pendiri, memperluas literatur suksesi dan warisan pendiri yang ada. Studi ini menawarkan model berbasis praktik tentang transmisi nilai kepemimpinan antar generasi dan menyoroti implikasi manajerial untuk merancang pembelajaran berbasis pengalaman, menumbuhkan kepemimpinan yang terwujud, dan memupuk iklim relasional yang mendukung keberlanjutan dalam usaha keluarga.
References
Algoe, S. B. (2012). Find, remind, and bind: The functions of gratitude in everyday relationships. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(6), 455–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00439.x
Bennett, N., & Lemoine, G. J. (2014). What a difference a word makes: Understanding threats to performance in a VUCA world. Business Horizons, 57(3), 311–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.01.001
Braun, Virginia & Clarke, Victoria. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3. 77-101. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597
Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004
Burton, M. D., & Beckman, C. M. (2007). Leaving a legacy: Position imprints and successor turnover in young firms. American Sociological Review, 72(2), 239–266.
Carney M. & Gedajlovic E. (2002). The co–evolution of institutional environments and organizational strategies: The rise of family business groups in the ASEAN region. Organization Studies, 23(1), 1–31.
Cunliffe, A. L. (2002). Reflexive Dialogical Practice in Management Learning. Management Learning, 33(1), 35-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507602331002
Dutton, J.E. and Heaphy, E.D. (2006) The Power of High-Quality Connections. In: Cameron, K.S., Dutton, J.E. and Quinn, R.E., Eds., Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline, Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco, 263-278.
Endah, A. (2019). Ciputra the entrepreneur: The passion of my life. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Feldman, M. S., Pentland, B. T., D'Adderio, L., Dittrich, K., Rerup, C., & Seidl, D. (2021). What is routine dynamics? In M. S. Feldman, B. T. Pentland, L. D'Adderio, K. Dittrich, C. Rerup, & D. Seidl (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Routine Dynamics (pp. 1-18). Cambridge University Press.
Fiske, A. P. (1992). Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations: Communal sharing, authority ranking, equality matching, market pricing. Free Press.
Fry, L. W. (2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 693–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.001
Gherardi, Silvia. (2009). Community of practice or practices of a community?. 10.4135/9780857021038.n27.
Gioia, Dennis & Patvardhan, Shubha & Hamilton, Aimee & Corley, Kevin. (2013). Organizational Identity Formation and Change. The Academy of Management Annals. 7. 10.1080/19416520.2013.762225.
Jaskiewicz, P., Combs, J.G., Rau, S.B., 2015. Entrepreneurial legacy: toward a theory of how some family firms nurture trans-generational entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Ventur. 30 (1), 29–49 (in this issue).
Jaskiewicz, Peter & Jr, W.. (2017). Addressing the Elephant in the Room Disentangling Family Heterogeneity to Advance Family Business Research. Family Business Review. 30. 10.1177/0894486517700469.
Kolodinsky, R. W., Giacalone, R. A., & Jurkiewicz, C. L. (2008). Workplace Values and Outcomes: Exploring Personal, Organizational, and Interactive Workplace Spirituality. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(2), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9507-0
Ladkin, D., & Taylor, S. S. (2010). Enacting the ‘true self’: Towards a theory of embodied authentic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.10.005
Kameda, Tatsuya & Takezawa, Masanori & Hastie, Reid. (2005). Where Do Social Norms Come From?The Example of Communal Sharing. Current Directions in Psychological Science - CURR DIRECTIONS PSYCHOL SCI. 14. 331-334. 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00392.x.
Knapp, J. R., Smith, B. R., Kreiner, G. E., Sundaramurthy, C., & Barton, S. L. (2013). Managing Boundaries Through Identity Work: The Role of Individual and Organizational Identity Tactics: The Role of Individual and Organizational Identity Tactics. Family Business Review, 26(4), 333-355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486512474036
Maclean, M, Harvey, C & Chia, R 2012, 'Sensemaking, storytelling and the legitimization of elite business careers', Human Relations, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 17-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711425616
Maitlis, S., Vogus, T. J., & Lawrence, T. B. (2013). Sensemaking and emotion in organizations. Organizational Psychology Review, 3(3), 222–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386613489062
Maitlis S and Christianson M (2014) Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals 8(1): 57–125
Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., & Yanow, D. (n.d.). Introduction: Toward a Practice-Based View of Knowing and Learning in Organizations.
Pawar, Badrinaraya. (2009). Individual spirituality, workplace spirituality and work attitudes: An empirical test of direct and interaction effects. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 30. 759-777. 10.1108/01437730911003911.
Ravasi, D., & Schultz, M. (2006). Responding to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 433–458.
Rego, A. and Cunha, M.P. (2008) Workplace Spirituality and Organizational Commitment: An Empirical Study. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 21, 53-75.
Saksono, L.A., Bungin , B., & Bernardus, D. (2025). The Exploration Study of Entrepreneurial Leadership as a Strategic Asset in Ciputra Group. Binus Business Review , 16 (1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v16i1.12097
Sandberg J and Tsoukas H (2020) Sensemaking reconsidered: Towards a broader understanding through phenomenology. Organization Theory 1(1): 2631787719879937.
Seidl, David & Grossmann-Hensel, Benjamin & Jarzabkowski, Paula. (2021). Strategy as practice and routine dynamics.
Smith, Wendy & Lewis, Marianne. (2011). Toward A Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Organizing. The Academy of Management Review. 36. 10.5465/AMR.2011.59330958.
Suddaby, R., Foster, W. M., & Trank, C. Q. (2010). Rhetorical history as a source of competitive advantage. In J. A. C.Baum & J. Lampel (Eds.), Advances in strategic management: The globalization of strategy research (pp. 147–173). Emerald.
Weick, Karl E.1995 Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA; London: Sage.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yohanes Santoso, Metta Padmalia, Andrea Gideon

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

