The Effect of Institusional Ownership, Managerial Ownership, Profitability and Audit Quality on Tax Agressivity

Muhammad Zaid Al Fikri; Herlin Tundjung Setijaningsih

doi:10.31539/costing.v7i3.9567

Muhammad Zaid Al Fikri Universitas Bina Nusantara
Herlin Tundjung Setijaningsih Universitas Bina Nusantara

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31539/costing.v7i3.9567

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the causality relationship, which explains the independent variables consisting of institutional ownership, managerial ownership, profitability and audit quality against the dependent variable of tax aggressiveness. The data analysis of this research is quantitative analysis and uses Eviews software. EViews is software used for statistical analysis and econometrics. EViews allows users to process data, test hypotheses, and create statistical models for data analysis. EViews methods include the use of time series and cross-sectional data to perform regression analysis, multivariate analysis, causality testing, and data stationary testing. EViews can also be used to design, test, and estimate econometric models such as linear regression models, autoregressive models, and mobile autoregressive models. The results of this study show that the pattern of data that has been collected and the results of testing that has been carried out using Eviews 12 with the panel data regression analysis method show that first, institutional ownership has a negative and significant effect on tax aggressiveness. Second, managerial ownership has a significant negative effect on tax aggressiveness. Third, profitability has a significantly positive effect on tax aggressiveness. Fourth, audit quality has a significant negative effect on tax aggressiveness.

Keywords: institutional ownership, managerial ownership, profitability and quality checks on tax aggressiveness

References

Amila, K., & Suryadi, K. (2014). Keefektifan Online Knowledge Sharing Behavior (Studi Kasus: Blended Learning Itb). JRSI (Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem Dan Industri), 1(1), 129–136.
Anggraeni, T., & Oktaviani, R. M. (2021). Dampak Thin Capitalization, Profitabilitas, dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Tindakan Penghindaran Pajak. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Pajak, 21(2), 390–397.
Astuti, E. P. (2020). Manajemen Keuangan. Dsanta Multivisitama.
Damayanti, F., & Susanto, T. (2016). Pengaruh Komite Audit, Kualitas Audit, Kepemilikan Institusional, Risiko Perusahaan Dan Return on Assets Terhadap Tax Avoidance. Esensi, 5(2), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.15408/ess.v5i2.2341
Gaaya, S., Lakhal, N., & Lakhal, F. (2017). Does family ownership reduce corporate tax avoidance? The moderating effect of audit quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(7), 731–744.
Guay, W. R., Kothari, S. P., & Watts, R. L. (1996). A market-based evaluation of discretionary accrual models. Journal of Accounting Research, 34, 83–105.
Gujarati, D. N. (2004). Basic Econometrics. Fourth Edition. Mc Graw Hill/Irwin.2003.
Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2–3), 127–178.
Hanlon, M., Krishnan, G. V, & Mills, L. F. (2012). Audit fees and book-tax differences. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 34(1), 55–86.
Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (2012). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. In The Economic Nature of the Firm: A Reader, Third Edition (pp. 283–303). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817410.023
Kartikasari, N. F., Wibowo, A. S., & Kartikasari, N. F. (2020). PROSEDUR PEMERIKSAAN LOPOGRAFI PADA KASUS POST COLOSTOMY.
Komite Nasional Kebijakan Governance (KNKG). (2015). Pedoman Good Corporate Governance Perusahaan. In Pedoman GCG.
Kurniawan, A. (2018). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan. Remaja Rosda Karya.
Lusida, M. A. P., Salamah, S., Jonatan, M., Wiyogo, I. O., Asyari, C. H., Ali, N. D., Asmara, J., Wahyuningtyas, R. I., Triyono, E. A., & Ratnadewi, N. K. (2022). Prevalence of and risk factors for depression, anxiety, and stress in non-hospitalized asymptomatic and mild COVID-19 patients in East Java province, Indonesia. Plos One, 17(7), e0270966.
Maharani, W., & Juliarto, A. (2019a). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Keluarga Terhadap Tax Avoidance Dengan Kualitas Audit Sebagai Variabel Moderating. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 8(4), 1–10.
Maharani, W., & Juliarto, A. (2019b). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Keluarga Terhadap Tax Avoidance Dengan Kualitas Audit Sebagai Variabel Moderating. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 8(4), 1–10.
Mulawarman, W. G. (2020). Persoalan dosen dan mahasiswa masa pandemik Covid 19: Dari gagap teknologi hingga mengeluh boros paket data. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hardiknas, 1, 37–46.
Puspitaningtyas, D. M. (2019). Inventory and exploration of orchid in Polewali Mandar, West Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 20(7).
Rukmana, P. A. (2018). ANALISIS PENGARUH UKURAN PERUSAHAAN, MARGIN LABA KOTOR, VARIABILITAS PERSEDIAAN DAN RASIO PERPUTARAN PERSEDIAAN TERHADAP PEMILIHAN METODE AKUNTANSI PERSEDIAAN PADA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA. Universitas Satya Negara Indonesia.
Sugianto, D. (2019). Mengenal soal Penghindaran Pajak yang Dituduhkan ke Adaro. DetikFinance.Com.
Sumardi, R., & Suharyono, S. (2020). Dasar-dasar manajemen keuangan (LPU-UNAS, Ed.).
Suwiknyo, E. (2021a). Mayoritas Perusahaan Tambang Belum Transparan Soal Pajak. In Bisnis.com (p. 1).
Suwiknyo, E. (2021b). Mayoritas Perusahaan Tambang Belum Transparan Soal Pajak. In Bisnis.com (p. 1).
Triyanti, N. W., Titisari, K. H., & Dewi, R. R. (2020). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Size, Leverage, Komite Audit, Komisaris Independen dan Umur Perusahaan terhadap Tax Avoidance. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 20(1), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v20i1.850
Wijaya, A. (2019). Jalan Panjang Kasus Pajak KPC. In Tempo.co (pp. 1–2).