Inovasi Platform Integrasi Belanja Pemerintah melalui Digipay “Pemberdayaan UMKM Perspektif New Public Governance”
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of Digipay in improving the efficiency, transparency, and accountability of state spending management, as well as evaluating its role in the transformation of digital-based public governance involving the concept of New Public Governance. This study uses a qualitative methodology based on secondary data to analyze the implementation of the Digital Payment (Digipay) platform by the Ministry of Finance in government spending. The results of the study show that the implementation of Digipay has received a positive response from various parties, with significant transaction values since its initial implementation in 2021. Digipay promotes public innovation through governance transformation that includes the concept of co-production, hybrid organizations, key competencies, accountability, and operational evaluation based on the New Public Governance approach. Sipmulan, Digipay is an effective innovation in strengthening the digital economy, supporting bureaucratic efficiency, and increasing regional economic competitiveness. Continuous support from the government, banking, and the community is needed to optimize the implementation and expand the benefits of this system.
Keywords: Innovation, Public Services, New Public Governance
References
Comparing Local Government Systems across Countries: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges to Building a Field of Comparative Local Government Studies Harold Wolman hwolman@gwu.eduView all authors and affiliations Volume 26, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1068/cav5
Cornforth C. (2003). The governance of public and non-profit organizations: what do boards do? London: Routledge. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/books/mono/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9780203167571&type=googlepdf
De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., Tummers, L., 2015. Innovation in the public sector: asystematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration 94, 146–166. http://dx. doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209.
Frederickson, H George; The Spirit of Public Administration; JosseyBass Publishers; San Fransisco; 1997
Hanf, K., & Scharpf, F. W. (1978). Interorganizational Policy Making: Limits to Coordination and Central Control. London, Beverly Hills: Sage Publications. https://pure.mpg.de/pubman/faces/ViewItemOverviewPage.jsp?itemId=item_3175675
Hasibuan, S., Rodliyah, I., Thalhah, S. Z., Ratnaningsih, P. W., & E, A. A. M. S. (2022). Media penelitian kualitatif. In Jurnal EQUILIBRIUM(Vol. 5, Issue January). http://belajarpsikologi.com/metode-penelitian-kualitatif/
Jorgensen, Torben Beck, 1993. Modes of Governance and Administratice Change. In Jan Kooiman, ed. Modern Governance. London: Sage, pp. 219-234.
Kettl, D. F. (2000). The Global Public Management Revolution (Washington). Brookings Institution
New directions in the study of policy networks R. A. W. RHODES, DAVID MARSH First published: February 1992 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1992.tb00294.xCitations: 239
Peter, J. P., & Olson, J. C. (2008). Consumer behavior and marketing strategy (8th ed.). Singapore: McGraw-Hill. https://thuvienso.hoasen.edu.vn/handle/123456789/9988
Toni Bovaird, & Elke Loeffler, “From Engagement to Co-Production : The Contribution of Users and Communities to Outcomes and Public Value”. Voluntas. Vol 23, 2012, Hal. 1121. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11266-012-9309-6
Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability by R. A. W. Rhodes Review by: Judy Johnston Administrative Theory & Praxis, Vol. 20, No. 3 (Sep., 1998), pp. 394-396 (3 pages). https://www.jstor.org/stable/25611298
Copyright (c) 2025 Aris Styadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
