Kedudukan Hukum Pengguna Prompt dalam Karya Visual Berbasis Artificial Intelligence Generatif Perspektif Hukum Hak Cipta Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31539/v8m9gb12Keywords:
artificial intelligence generatif, prompt pengguna, hak cipta, subjek hukum, karya visual.Abstract
This study aims to analyze the legal status of prompt users in generative AI-based visual works and examine the form of copyright legal protection for these works from an Indonesian legal perspective. The study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory, conceptual, and comparative approach. The results of the study indicate that Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright still adheres to the Human Authorship doctrine which places humans as the sole legal subject of the creator. However, prompt users can be qualified as creators if they are proven to have made a substantive creative contribution to the visual works produced by the generative AI system. This study also found a gap in legal norms related to the regulation of AI-based works in Indonesia, so that a reformulation of copyright regulations that are adaptive to the development of digital technology is needed. The conclusion of this study is that copyright regulations in Indonesia are still based on the Human Authorship doctrine, so that generative AI has not been recognized as creators, while prompt users can be recognized as creators if they make a substantive creative contribution, so that a reformulation of the Copyright Law is needed to address the gap in norms and provide legal certainty for works produced with the help of generative AI.
Keywords: Copyright, Generative Artificial Intelligence, Legal Subject, User Prompt, Visual Artwork.
References
Abbott, R. (2020). The reasonable robot: Artificial Intelligence and the law. Cambridge University Press.
Bently, L., & Sherman, B. (2021). Intellectual property law (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Bonadio, E., Lucchi, N., & Mazziotti, G. (2022). Will technology-aided creativity force us to rethink copyright’s fundamentals? International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 53(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-022-01184-9
Colton, S., Pease, A., & Charnley, J. (2018). Computational creativity theory: The FACE and IDEA models. Springer.
Damian, E. (2014). Hukum hak cipta. Alumni.
European Parliament. (2020). Resolution on intellectual property rights for the development of Artificial Intelligence technologies. European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0277_EN.pdf
Gervais, D. J. (2021). The machine as author. Iowa Law Review, 105(5), 2053–2092.
Heath, C., Moerland, A., & Sanders, A. K. (2020). Intellectual property law and the fourth industrial revolution. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839106213
Ibrahim, J. (2013). Teori dan metodologi penelitian hukum normatif. Bayumedia Publishing.
Kop, M. (2019). AI & intellectual property: Towards an articulated public domain. Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal, 28(1), 19–62.
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian hukum (Edisi revisi). Kencana.
Okediji, R. L. (2018). Creative markets and copyright in the fourth industrial era. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD).
Rahardjo, S. (2006). Ilmu hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Download/28031/UU%20Nomor%2028%20Tahun%202014.pdf
Rothman, J. E. (2021). The author as machine. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 34(2), 367–412.
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
Saidin, O. K. (2015). Aspek hukum hak kekayaan intelektual. Rajawali Pers.
Samuelson, P. (2019). Allocating ownership rights in computer-generated works. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 80(4), 709–755.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Rajawali Pers.
United Kingdom. (1988). Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/gb/gb019en.pdf
United States Copyright Office. (2023). Copyright registration guidance: Works containing material generated by artificial intelligence. Federal Register. https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2023-05321.pdf
WIPO. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and intellectual property. World Intellectual Property Organization. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo-pub-rn2024-1-en-artificial-intelligence-and-intellectual-property.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Amrullah Hamid, Selamat Lumban Gaol, Rizky Pratama Putra Karo Karo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
