Evaluasi Penggunaan Surgical Safety Checklist terhadap Kematian Pasien setelah Laparotomi Darurat di Kamar Operasi

  • Joni Krismanto Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • Ikhlas Muhammad Jenie Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Abstract

This study aims to analyze articles about surgical safety checklists on patient deaths after emergency surgery in the operating room, especially in Indonesia. The literature database search method was carried out on Google Scholar and Pubmed. The literature used is literature that meets the inclusion criteria and was published in the last five years. The results showed that the use of the surgical safety checklist is highly expected to be applied to preoperative and postoperative procedures that reduce surgical complications and determine the evaluation of the use of the surgical safety checklist on patient mortality after emergency laparotomy in the operating room. In conclusion, the application of a surgical safety checklist in emergency laparotomy surgery will be very helpful in reducing the occurrence of errors in operating procedures and complications of emergency laparatomy operations.

 

Keywords: Patient mortality, Emergency Laparotomy, Surgical Safety Checklist

References

Alidina, S., Kuchukhidze, S., Menon, G., Citron, & Maongezi, S. (2019). Effectiveness of A Multicomponent Safe Surgery Intervention on Improving Surgical Quality in Tanzania’s Lake Zone: Protocol for a Quasi-Experimental Study. BMJ Open, 9(10), 150-157. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031800

Almeida, R. E. de, & Rodrigues, M. C. S. (2019). Implementation of the Surgical Safety Checklist for Pediatric Operations: Compliance Assessment. Revista Gaúcha de Enfermagem, 40(2), 30-38. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2019.20180270

Bampoe, S., Cook, & Haller, G. (2018). Clinical Indicators for Reporting the Effectiveness of Patient Quality and Safety-Related Interventions: A Protocol of a Systematic Review and Delphi Consensus Process as Part of the International Standardised Endpoints for Perioperative Medicine Initiative (StEP). BMJ Open, 8(11), 42-46. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023427

Barreira, M. A., Siveira, D. G., & Borges, G. C. de O. (2019). Evaluation Tool for a Gastroenterostomy Simulated Training. Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, 34(3), 10-14. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020190030000008

Birgand, G., Haudebourg, T., Grammatico-Guillon, L., & Giraudeau, B. (2019). Improvement in Staff Behavior During Surgical Procedures to Prevent Post-Operative Complications (ARIBO2): Study Protocol for a Cluster Randomised Trial. BMJ Open, 20(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3370-z

Clack., L., Willi, U., Sax, H. (2019). Implementation of a Surgical Unit-Based Safety Programme in African Hospitals: A Multicentre Qualitative Study. Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, 8(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0541-3

Costas‐havarri, A., Thomas, H. S., Weiser, T. G., & Blanco, R. (2019). Pooled Analysis of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist Use and Mortality After Emergency Laparotomy. BMJ Open, 106(2), 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11051

Handaya, A. Y., & Werdana, V. A. P. (2019). Adherence to Preoperative Hand Hygiene and Sterile Gowning Technique among Consultant Surgeons, Surgical Residents, and Nurses: A Pilot Study at an Academic Medical Center in Indonesia. Patient Safety in Surgery, 13(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-019-0193-5

Kisacik, O. G., & Cigerci, Y. (2019). Use of the Surgical Safety Checklist in the Operating Room: Operating Room Nurses’ Perspectives. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 35(3). 11-15. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.3.29

Medvedev, O. N., & Weller, J. M. (2019). Examining reliability of WHOBARS: A Tool to Measure the Quality of Administration of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist Using Generalisability Theory with Surgical Teams from Three New Zealand Hospitals. BMJ Open, 9(1), 65-70. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022625

Scholz, R., Hönning, A., Seifert, J., Spranger, N., & Stengel, D. (2019). Effectiveness of Architectural Separation of Septic and Aseptic Operating Theatres for Improving Process Quality and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Systematic Reviews. BMJ Open, 8(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0937-9

Schwendimann, R., Blatter, C., Lüthy, & Hoffmann, H. (2019). Adherence to the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist: An Observational Study in A Swiss Academic Center. Patient Safety in Surgery, 13(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-019-0194-4

Storesund, A., Haugen, A. S., Wæhle, H. V., Mahesparan, R., Boermeester, M. A., Nortvedt, M. W., & Søfteland, E. (2019). Validation of a Norwegian Version of Surgical Patient Safety System (SURPASS) in Combination with the World Health Organizations’ Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO SSC). BMJ Open Quality, 8(1), 23-27. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000488

Tostes, M. F. do P., & Galvão, C. M. (2019). Implementation Process of the Surgical Safety Checklist: Integrative Review. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 27(4), 43-46. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.2921.3104

Wang, H., Zheng, T., Chen, D., Niu, Z., Zhou, X., Li, S., Zhou, Y., & Cao, S. (2019). Impacts of the Surgical Safety Checklist on Postoperative Clinical Outcomes in Gastrointestinal Tumor Patients: A Single-Center Cohort Study. Medicine, 98(28), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016418

White, M. C., Randall, K., Capo‐Chichi, N. F. E., & Leather, A. J. M. (2019). Implementation and Evaluation of Nationwide Scale‐Up of the Surgical Safety Checklist. BJS, 106(2), 91-102. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11034

Wiig, S., Aase, K., Johannessen, T., Holen-Rabbersvik, E., & Ree, E. (2019). How to Deal with Context? A Context-Mapping Tool for Quality and Safety in Nursing Homes and Homecare (SAFE-LEAD Context). BMC Research Notes, 12(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4291-3

Yu, D., & Zhao, Q. (2019). Effect Of Surgical Safety Checklists On Gastric Cancer Outcomes: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Cancer Management and Research, 11, 45-53.https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S218686
Published
2021-08-06
Abstract viewed = 328 times
pdf downloaded = 788 times