Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Heterogeneous Group terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Sejarah di SMK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31539/nes1f787Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the influence and differences in the influence of the use of the Heterogeneous Group learning model on student learning outcomes in history subjects. This study is a quantitative study using an experimental method with a research design that is Nonequivalent Control Group Design and sampling techniques through Probability Sampling. The data analysis technique used the t-test, by conducting normality tests and homogeneity tests. The results of this study indicate: 1) there is an influence of the Heterogeneous Group learning model on student learning outcomes in history subjects with a value of t count = 6.238 and t table at a significance level of 0.05 is 2.101, meaning 6.238 > 2.101. 2) there is a difference in the influence of the Heterogeneous Group learning model with the conventional learning model (lecture) on learning outcomes. It can be concluded that there is an influence of the Heterogeneous Group learning model on student learning outcomes in the history subject of class X Marketing at SMK Negeri 1 Luak District.
Keywords: Heterogeneous Group, Influence, Learning Outcomes.
References
An, S., & Zhang, S. (2023). Effects of ability grouping on students’ collaborative problem solving patterns: Evidence from lag sequence analysis and epistemic network analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101453
An, S., & Zhang, S. (2023). Effects of ability grouping on students’ collaborative problem solving patterns: Evidence from lag sequence analysis and epistemic network analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101453
Antony, J., & Arya, R. (2025). Effect of active learning versus traditional lecturing on the learning achievement of school students in social sciences: a meta analysis. BSSS Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.51767/je1404
Aprilia, N., & Isnaeni, B. (2025). Meta-analysis Of Cooperative Learning To Improve Learning Outcomes In Biology Subject. Jurnal Bioedukatika. https://doi.org/10.26555/bioedukatika.v11i1.28498
Ardiansyah, S. A., Fadilah, Q., Fatha, S. A., Hasanah, M., Zakia, N. M., Anisa, N., & Pratikno, A. S. (2025). Analisis Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Stad Pada Materi Bangun Datar Dalam Meningkatkan Antusiasme Siswa. Al-Irsyad: Journal of Education Science, 4(2), 561–573. https://doi.org/10.58917/aijes.v4i2.288
Arega, N., & Hunde, T. (2025). Constructivist instructional approaches: A systematic review of evaluation‐based evidence for effectiveness. Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.70040
Astutik, H., Rahman, A., & Djam’an, N. (2025). Integration of character education in constructivism-based learning model: its impact on students’ mathematics learning outcomes. International Journal of Didactic Mathematics in Distance Education. https://doi.org/10.33830/ijdmde.v2i2.11812
De Dios Tronch, A. (2025). Cooperative Learning as a Pathway to Competency-Based Education. Journal of Clinical Research and Case Studies. https://doi.org/10.61440/jcrcs.2025.v3.75
Demir, M., & Kaya, M. (2022). Analysis of Constructivist Learning Model’s Effects on Student Outcomes: A Second Order Meta-Analysis. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1122136
Doz, D., Černilec, B., Cotic, M., & D. (2022). Differences in students’ mathematics knowledge in homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/12431
H., Bich, N., & Nguyen, H. (2023). 3How do constructivism learning environments generate better motivation and learning strategies? The Design Science Approach. Heliyon, 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22862
Hidayat, R., and Abdillah, A. (2019) Ilmu Pendidikan: Konsep, Teori Dan Aplikasinya. Lembaga Peduli Pengembangan Pendidikan Indonesia (LPPPI). http://repository.uinsu.ac.id/8064/
Iskandar, S. (2025). Analysis of Effectiveness of Discovery Learning Model in Science Learning Activities for Basic Students. Jurnal Pijar Mipa. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v20i2.8548
Jayantika, I., Payadnya, P., & Suryawan, P. (2025). Group Dynamics in Mathematics Education: Homogeneous Vs. Heterogeneous Group Effects on Problem-Solving Skills. Jurnal Pedagogi dan Pembelajaran. https://doi.org/10.23887/jp2.v8i1.83498
Kanika, K., Chakraverty, S., Chakraborty, P., & Madan, M. (2022). Effect of different grouping arrangements on students’ achievement and experience in collaborative learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(10), 6366- 6378. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2036764
Kebede, Y., Zema, F., Geletu, G., & Zinabu, S. (2025). Cooperative Learning Instructional Approach and Student’s Biology Achievement: A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of Jigsaw Cooperative Learning Model in Secondary Schools in Gedeo Zone, South Ethiopia. SAGE Open, 15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251318883
Kozanitis, A., & Nenciovici, L. (2022). Effect of active learning versus traditional lecturing on the learning achievement of college students in humanities and social sciences: a meta-analysis. Higher Education, 86, 1377-1394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00977-8
Lei, Y., Fu, X., Zhao, J., & Yi, B. (2024). The effect of ability grouping on students' computational thinking in shared regulation-supported collaborative programming. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 1417-1443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12838-1
Linn, Z., Tashiro, Y., Morio, K., & Hori, H. (2022). Peer evaluations of group work in different years of medical school and academic achievement: how are they related?. BMC Medical Education, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03165-5
Mishra, N. (2023). Constructivist Approach to Learning: An Analysis of Pedagogical Models of Social Constructivist Learning Theory. Journal of Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.3126/jrdn.v6i01.55227
Rahayu, W., Setyawan, H., Jalinus, N., R., K., G., & Abdullah, R. (2025). Impact of Cooperative Learning on Vocational School Student Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v8i2.86982
Taggart, J., & Wheeler, L. (2023). Collaborative learning as constructivist practice: An exploratory qualitative descriptive study of faculty approaches to student group work. Active Learning in Higher Education, 26, 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874231193938
Tanjung, Y., Irfandi, I., Sudarma, T., Lufri, L., Asrizal*, A., & Hardeli, H. (2023). The effect of constructivism learning on student learning outcomes: a meta analysis study. ISER (Indonesian Science Education Research). https://doi.org/10.24114/iser.v5i1.49409
Vallès-Català, T., & Palau, R. (2023). Minimum entropy collaborative groupings: A tool for an automatic heterogeneous learning group formation. PLOS ONE, 18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280604
Yoon, P., Han, S., & Kim, K. (2024). Effects of team-building on group cohesion, group efficacy, and individual academic performance in virtual learning environment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 26, 255-275. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874241229422
Zajda, J. (2021). Constructivist Learning Theory and Creating Effective Learning Environments. Globalisation, Comparative Education and Policy Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71575-5_3
Zen, Z., R., S., & Ariani, F. (2022). Academic achievement: the effect of project-based online learning method and student engagement. Heliyon, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11509
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nahdatul Hazmi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
