An Analysis of Teaching English for Young Learners by Non English Pre­­-Service Teachers

Authors

  • Darman Pangaribuan Universitas Prima Indonesia
  • Debby Yolanda Br Manullang Universitas Prima Indonesia
  • Trisnawati Harefa Universitas Prima Indonesia
  • Dennis Chandra Universitas Prima Indonesia
  • Yenita Br Sembiring Universitas Prima Indonesia
  • Kartina Ramadhani Rambe STKIP Pangeran Antasari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31539/t3rbrm66

Abstract

This study studied how pre-service teachers without English training taught young learners at SD Antasari Medan, Indonesia. The qualitative descriptive study comprised six PGSD pre-service teachers who volunteered to teach English without formal English training. Classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis formed the basis for thematic analysis. The results demonstrated that teachers' general pedagogical skills helped them build pleasant learning spaces by greeting students, asking questions, motivating them, and planning Indonesian-English transitions. Teachers employed repetition, modelling, songs, pictures, gestures, and online resources to engage and instruct children. Due to their first language, pupils had problems reading, spelling, writing, and pronouncing words, and classroom management and evaluation were still poor. Transferable educational abilities helped, but they couldn't replace linguistic expertise. The study highlights the importance of focused professional development, improved instructional tools, and institutional support for primary school English teaching. The results also suggest that teacher education programs should better prepare non-English teachers for English instruction and encourage reflective practice. Comprehensive and longitudinal studies should examine non-specialist teaching's long-term consequences.

Keywords: English for Young Leaners; Non-specialist English Teaching; Pedagogical Competence; Pre-service Teachers; Professional Development

References

Asher, J. J. (1969). The total physical response approach to second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 53(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1969.tb04552.x

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brewster, J., Ellis, G., & Girard, D. (2002). The primary English teacher’s guide. Pearson Education.

Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

García, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave Macmillan.

Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., & O’Halloran, K. (2021). Introducing multimodality (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Macaro, E. (2020). Exploring teacher beliefs about code-switching in language classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 24(1), 38–56.

Mercer, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging language learners in contemporary classrooms. Cambridge University Press.

Nation, I. S. P. (2020). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Pinter, A. (2017). Teaching young language learners (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340.

Sulistiyo, U. (2016). English language teaching and learning in Indonesia. English Language Teaching, 9(3), 1–10.

Wijayanti, D., Nurwinanda, R., & Fatah, A. (2022). Teaching English in primary schools: Issues and strategies. Indonesian EFL Journal, 8(2), 115–124.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-18