Empowering Students’ Social Attitudes in EFL Classroom through Teacher Talk

Authors

  • Almas Rizkika Nabila Universitas Satya Wiyata Mandala

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31539/e7mab109

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to reveal the role of teacher in the form of teacher talk to empower students’ social attitudes in EFL classroom interaction as well as the difficulties that teacher faced. Through the qualitative method, this study describes the way English teacher in conveying the teacher talk during EFL interaction. The result showed that teacher used the features of teacher talk in the form of (1) praises and encouragement, (2) accepting students’ ideas, (3) asking question, (5) giving information, (6) giving direction and (7) criticizing students’ behavior. Moreover, teacher talk also empower students’ social attitude of honest, disciplined, responsible, caring, responsive and proactive. Teacher talk also represents the power for controlling students, the power to give the corrective action and the power in providing the supportive action for students. Lastly, this study also described some difficulties faced by teachers in delivering the teacher talk as well as the suggestion for future research.

Keywords: Critical Discourse Analysis, Power, Social Attitudes, Teacher Talk

References

Anderson, D. R. (2000). Character education: Who is responsible? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 27(3), 139–145.

Ariantini, N. P., Suandi, I. N., & Sutama, I. M. (2014). Implementasi pengintegrasian sikap spiritual dan sosial dalam pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia berbasis Kurikulum 2013 di kelas VII SMP Negeri 1 Singaraja. E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 3, 1–10.

Ball, S. J. (2012). Foucault, power, and education. Routledge.

Bausch, L. S., & Voorhees, S. C. (2008). Retrospective discourse discussions: How teacher talk enables one novice literacy teacher to make sense of complex teaching problems. The Teacher Educator, 43(2), 109–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730801931557

Biria, R., & Mohammadi, A. (2012). The sociopragmatic functions of inaugural speech: A critical discourse analysis approach. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(10), 1290–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.05.013

Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.

Cohrssen, C., Church, A., & Tayler, C. (2014). Purposeful pauses: Teacher talk during early childhood mathematics activities. International Journal of Early Years Education, 22(2), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2014.899999

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.

Ekawati, Y. N. (2017). English teachers’ problems in applying the 2013 curriculum. English Review: Journal of English Education, 6(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v6i1.771.

Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Fika, A. (2015). Strategi guru dalam membentuk sikap sosial siswa kelas I di MIN Malang I. Jurnal Universitas Negeri Malang, 4, 49–60.

Flanders, N. A. (1970). Analyzing teaching behavior. Addison-Wesley.

Froyen, L. A. (1993). Classroom management: The reflective teacher-leader. Macmillan.

Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2013). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Routledge.

Gerungan, W. A. (2010). Psikologi sosial (Cetakan ke-3). PT Refika Aditama.

Gusviani, E. (2016). Analisis kemunculan sikap spiritual dan sikap sosial dalam kegiatan pembelajaran IPA kelas IV SD yang menggunakan KTSP dan Kurikulum 2013. EduHumaniora: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 7(2), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.17509/eh.v7i2.2705

Hansen, C. C. (2004). Teacher talk: Promoting literacy development through response to story. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 19(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568540409595058

Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis (2nd ed.). Polity Press.

Lapsley, D. K., & Narvaez, D. (2006). Character education. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., pp. 248–296). Wiley.

Lee, B. (2002). The power principle (A. Saputra, Trans.). Bina Putra Aksara.

Lori, S., & Cleary, B. (2006). The influence of service learning on students’ personal and social development. College Teaching, 54(4), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.54.4.307-319

Maftoon, P., & Shakouri, N. (2012). The concept of power in teacher talk: A critical discourse analysis. World Applied Sciences Journal, 19(8), 1208–1215.

Molnar, A., & Rehage, K. J. (1997). The construction of children’s character (Vol. 92). National Society for the Study of Education.

Purwanto, N. (2010). Psikologi pendidikan. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Rainer Dangel, J., & Durden, T. R. (2010). The nature of teacher talk during small group activities. Early Childhood Education Journal, 37(5), 325–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-009-0368-5

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational behavior (15th ed.). Pearson Education.

Robertson, D. A. (2013). Teacher talk: One teacher’s reflections during comprehension strategies instruction. Reading Psychology, 34(6), 523–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2012.675418

Saville-Troike, M. (1997). The ethnographic analysis of communicative events. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), The handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 351–365). Blackwell.

Slavin, R. E. (2019). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (12th ed.). Pearson.

Stone, C. (1986). Power and social complexity. In R. J. Waste (Ed.), Community power: Directions for future research (pp. 77–113). Sage.

Sultan, S., & Jufri, J. (2019). Teachers’ control on students: Representation of antisocial communication in an Indonesian language learning context. Humaniora, 10(2), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v10i2.5547

Taylor, L. A., Vlach, S. K., & Wetzel, M. M. (2018). Observing, resisting, and problem-posing language and power: Possibilities for small stories in inservice teacher education. Linguistics and Education, 46, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.04.002

Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Politics, ideology, and discourse. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 728–740). Elsevier.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-27