American Humor used in an American Comedy Movie The Boss

  • Sastika Seli STKIP PGRI Lubuklinggau
  • Bahya Alfitri STKIP PGRI Lubuklinggau

Abstract

The research aims to describe the functions of humor used in an American comedy movie The Boss. The subject of the research was American comedy movie The Boss. Descriptive qualitative method was used to conduct the research. Data collection was done through library research and documentation. Data analysis was done through identification, coding, classification and description. The researcher found several findings. Supported by Meyers theory of joke, there are 6 functions of jokes found in the movie such as to insult someone, to express anger, to tease someone, to relieve tension, to get attention, and to amuse others. The dominant function was differentiation particularly to insult and to express anger 21 times, the second was clarification particularly to relieve tension humorous lines and amuse others 15 times, the third was enforcement particularly to tease 18 times, and the last was identification particularly to relieve tension and to get attention 27 times. These functions were also analyzed and discriminated by different setting and participant based on formality and participants distance. According to the analysis, most jokes occurred in informal situation with intimate relationship among the participants and functioned to tease someone and to relieve tension. This finding also proves that American humor is expressed with more slapstick and vulgarity as the characteristic of American humor used in daily communication.

Keywords: sociolinguistics, humor, American humor, American comedy movie, The Boss movie

References

Attardo, S. (1994). Linguistic theories of humor. New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.

Dudden, A. P. (1987). American humor. New York: Oxford University Press.

Holmes, J. (2013). An introduction to sociolinguistics (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.

Hu, S. (2012). An analysis of humor in the big bang theory from pragmatic perspectives. Theory and practice in language studies, 2(6), 1185-1190.

Jie, Z. (2016). James Thurber’s humor represents typical American humor. Sino-US English Teaching, 5(13), 395-400. doi:10.17265/1539-8072/2016.05.009.

Mak, B. (2008). Humor and funny stories: A sociolinguistic study of newcomers’ socialization into Hong Kong workplaces. The university of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Meyer, C. F. (2009). Introducing Englishlinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Meyer, J. C. (2000). Humor as a double-edged sword: Four functions of humor in communication. Communication Theory, 10, 310-311.

Meyer, J. C.. (2015). Understanding humor through communication: why be funny anyway?. [e-book]. RetrievedOctober 10, 2016, from http://books.google.co./books?Understanding+Humor+through+Communication++Why+Be+Funny,+Anyway+++John+C.+Meyer.

Moleong. (1995). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Pustaka Setia

Romero, E.J. &Cruthirds, K.W. (2006). The use of humour in the wokrplace. Academy of management perspectives, 20(2), 58-69.

Seitz, M. Z. (2016), April 8. The BossMovie Review & Film Summary 2016. Retrieved October 20, 2016, from
http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/the-boss-2016.

Sen, A. (2012). Humor analysis and qualitative research. Social Research Update,63,1360-7898.
Published
2017-12-30
Abstract viewed = 8163 times
pdf downloaded = 245 times