The Implementation of Group Works on English Education Students at the University of Papua: The Perceptions and Problems
This study aimed at investigating students perceptions on the implementation of group works and the problems that students faced in working with their friends in group. The method of this study was mix method, descriptive quantitave and descriptive qualitative method. The participants were sixty (60) students of the first and second year students in English Education at Papua University. The data for study was taken from a five level Linkert scale questionnaire, open ended questionnaire and students reflection sheet. The results showed that some 30 (50 percent) of students preferred group work to individual work and few students 12 (20 percent) were disagree with group works in their learning proces while some other 18 (30 percent) of students chose no opinion. The problems faced by students were that there were students who were difficult to interact with other tended to be passive in group discussion, those who were hinger achievers tended to dominate in group and did not listen to other opinions (sometimes did not have willingness to study together) then caused students with lower level ability had no confidence to talk in group discussion (sometimes did not come to group discussion), and students who did not want to work had no effort to read and to study materials (only asked for explanation from his or her friends). Thus, it can be concluded that the students in English Education Department at The University of Papua had positive perception on the implementation of group works in teaching process and the problems in working in group came from themselves and from their group members.
Key words: group works, the perception, the problems, Higher Education
Barkeley, E.F., Cross, K.P., & Major. C.H. (2005) Collaborative Learning Techniques: A handbook foe college facukty. San Francisci; Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Beebe, S.A., & Masterson, J.T. (2003). Communicating in small groups. Pearson Education Inc. Boston Massachusetts.
Blaz, Deborah. (2006). Differentiated Instruction: A Guide for Foreign Language Teachers. NY: Eye on Education.
Brown, D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Y: Longman.
Csernica, J., Hanyka, M., Hyde, D., Shooter., Toole, M., & Vigeant, M. (2002). Practical guide to taemwork version 1.1. College of Engineering, Bicknell University.
Connery, B.A. (1988). Group work and collaborative writing. Teaching at Davis, 14(1),p.2-4. (Publication of the Teaching Resourches Center, University of California at Davis)
Daba T, Ejersa, S J & Aliyi, S. (2017). Student perception on group work and group assignments in classroom teaching: the case of Bule Hora University second year biology students, South Ethiopia: An Action Research. Educational Research and Reviews. http://www.academicjournals.org/ERR
Davis, .G. (1993). Tools for Teaching. Jossey-Bass Inc., San Francisco: California.
Elgort, I., Smith A.G., & Toland, J. (2008). Is wiki an effective platform for group corse work? Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 24 (2), 195-210.
Felder, R.M. and rent, R. (2001). Effective strategies for cooperative learning. Journal of Cooperation & Collaboration in College Teaching, 10(2), 69-75).
Gillies, R.M. (2003). Structuring cooperative group work in classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 35-49
Gomleksize, M.N. (2007). Effectiveness of cooperative learning (Jigsaw II) method in teaching english as a foreign language to engineering students (case of Firat University, Turkey). European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(5), 613-625). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03043790701433343
Hung, Yu-Ju. (2015). Practice of Differentiated Instruction and Alternative Assessments with Young EFL Learners in Taiwan. Tesol International Journal, Vol. 10 Issue 2.
Liu, S., Joy, M.,& Griffiths, N. (2010) Students’ perceptions of the factors leading to unsuccessful group collaboration. 2010 10th IEEE International Confrence on Adbanced Learning Technologies. Oro.open.ac.uk/42138/1/liu_joy-griffiths_icalt10..pdf.
Payne, B.K., Monl-Turner, E., Smith, D.,& Sumter, D. (2004). Improving group work: voices of students. Education, 126 (3), P. 441-448.
Steven, R.J. & Slavin, R (1995). The Cooperative Elementary School: Effects on Student’s Achievement, Attitudes and School Relations. American Educational Research Journal 32 (2), 321-351
Sofroniou, A., & Poutos, Konstantinos. (2016). Investigating The Effectiveness of Group Work in Mathematics. Educ.Sci.2016,6,30. http://www.mdpi.com>pdf
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The development of hinger prsychological processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wasley, P. (2006). Underrepresented students benefit most from engagement. The chronicle of Hinger Education, 53 (13), p.A39
Zschocke, K., Wosnitza, M., & Bürger, K. (2016). Emotions in group work: insights form an appraisal-oriented perspective. Eur J Psychol Educ (2016) 31:359-384. DOI 10.1007/s10212-015-0278-1