Perancangan Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja pada Layanan Bantuan Teknis Administratif Bangunan Gedung Negara

Authors

  • Vashti Andini Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Syarifa Hanoum Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Muhammad Saad Salahudin Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31539/7v2zqm38

Abstract

This study aims to design a comprehensive, multi-stakeholder performance measurement system by integrating the Performance Prism and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) methods. The Performance Prism is used to formulate performance indicators based on five main perspectives: stakeholder satisfaction, stakeholder contribution, strategies, processes, and capabilities. The design phase involves stakeholder identification, interview data coding, indicator development, validation through Focus Group Discussions (FGDs), and KPI attribute development. The weighting phase is carried out by developing a hierarchical indicator structure, distributing paired comparison questionnaires, and processing the data using Expert Choice to obtain weights and consistency levels. The study resulted in 32 final KPIs distributed as follows: Coordinator (6 KPIs), Applicant (8 KPIs), and PTK (18 KPIs). The PTK stakeholder is the highest priority with a weighting of 0.536, followed by Coordinator (0.295), and Applicant (0.169). At the KPI level, the "online file review response time" indicator received the highest weighting (0.230), and "duration of SOP updates in the information system" the lowest (0.017). These results demonstrate the importance of performance measurement that takes into account the complexity of multi-stakeholder contributions in public services. The resulting performance measurement system serves not only as an evaluation tool but also as a strategic guide for decision-making, priority allocation, and improving the effectiveness of administrative technical assistance services for state buildings.

 

Keywords: Performance Measurement, Performance Prism, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)

 

References

Dwitasari, R., Ayuningtyas, D., & Hidayat, A. (2025). Analisis Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja Sektor Publik di Indonesia. Jurnal Administrasi dan Kebijakan Publik, 10(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.24832/jakp.v10i1.1839

Fazri, A., Hidayat, S., & Nurhidayati, D. (2022). Evaluasi Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja dalam Meningkatkan Tata Kelola Pemerintahan. Jurnal Manajemen Publik, 6(3), 214–229. https://doi.org/10.23969/jmp.v6i3.5785

Putri, A. D. (2019). Penerapan Sistem Penilaian Kinerja untuk Peningkatan Kualitas Layanan Publik pada Disperindag. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 7(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.31289/jap.v7i1.2567

Sulisworo, D. (2009). Evaluasi Kinerja Layanan Publik melalui Pendekatan Balanced Scorecard. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Publik, 2(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.22212/jekp.v2i2.115

Striteska, M., & Spickova, M. (2012). Review and Comparison of Performance Measurement Systems. Journal of Organizational Management Studies, 2012(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5171/2012.114091

Sumanto, S. (2021). Analytical Hierarchy Process dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Multikriteria. Jurnal Sistem Informasi dan Manajemen, 9(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.26418/jsim.v9i2.4952

Veledar, S., Zekan, S., & Kasumovic, A. (2014). Performance Measurement Issues in Public Sector of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Economic Review: Journal of Economics and Business, 12(1), 41–55. https://hrcak.srce.hr/120366

Worldailmi, D. (2012). Performance Prism sebagai Model Pengukuran Kinerja Organisasi Publik. Jurnal Manajemen dan Akuntansi, 3(4), 255–267.

Vanany, I. (2012). Model Pengukuran Kinerja Berbasis AHP dan Performance Prism pada Organisasi Publik. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Manajemen Teknologi, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, 45–53.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-30