Hubungan Lingkungan dan Disiplin Kerja terhadap Kinerja Guru dalam Proses Pembelajaran
Abstract
This study aims to determine the relationship between the work environment and work discipline, both partially and on the performance of teachers at SMK PGRI 1 Palembang. The type of research used in this research is descriptive analysis with a quantitative approach to describe the relationship between variables through hypothesis testing. This study used a questionnaire as a data collection tool which was distributed to 42 respondents from SMK PGRI 1 Palembang. Based on the results of the research conducted, there is a simultaneous significant relationship between the Work Environment and Work Discipline variables on the Teacher Performance variable in the Learning Process. This is evidenced by obtaining Fcount 6.622 which is greater than Ftable 2.850. In addition, it is known that partially the Work Environment (X1) has no relationship with Teacher Performance (Y). This is evidenced by the acquisition of tcount 1.078 < ttable 2.023, and coefficient 0.288. Meanwhile, Work Discipline (X2) has a positive and significant relationship to Teacher Performance (Y). This is evidenced by the acquisition of tcount which is greater than ttable (2.782 > 2.023) and the coefficient is 0.008 and the value is positive.
Keywords: work environment, work discipline and teacher performance
References
Arikunto, Suharmisi. 1998. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Burhan Bungin, 2005. Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Dan Kebijakan Publik Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Lainya, Jakarta: Kencana, hlm. 122.
Barnawi & Mohammad Arifin.(2014). Kinerja Guru Profesional. Yogyakarta: Ar-ruzz Media
Bejo, Siswanto. 2005. Manajemen Tenaga Kerja Indonesia Pendekatan Administrarif dan Operasional. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Danim, Sudarwan. 2010. Profesionalisasi dan Etika Profesi Guru. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Griffin, Ricky W.2003. Manajemen Jilid 1. Edisi Ketujuh. Erlangga, Jakarta.
Handoko, T. H. 2001. Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi 2. Cetakan kelimabelas. Yogyakarta: BPFE
Hasibuan, Malayu. 2009. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. PT Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.
Ilyas, Yaslis (2002). Kinerja; teori, penilaian, dan penelitian. Depok: Pusat Kajian Ekonomi Kesehatan FKMUI.
Indrafachrudi. 2000. Kepemimpinan Pendidikan. Malang: P3T IKIP Malang.
Mangkunegara, A.A. Anwar Prabu.2000. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Remaja Rosda Karya, Bandung.
_____________. 2011. Manajemen Sumber Daya Perusahaan. PT . Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung.
Manullang, M, 2000. Manajemen Personalia. Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.
Mulyatiningsih, E. 2011. Metode Penelitian Terapan Bidang Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Alfabeta.
Prawirosentono, Suryadi. 1999. Kebijakan Kinerja Karyawan. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Rivai, V. dan E.J. Sagala. 2010. ManajemenSumber Daya Manusia untuk Perusahaan:Dari Teori ke Praktik. Edisi 2. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Sedarmayanti. (2006). Sumber Daya Manusia dan Produktivitas Kerja, Bandung. Mandar Maju
__________. (2017). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia.Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Sinambela, Lijan Poltak. 2018. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Cetakan Ketiga. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara
Soekanto, Soerjono. 2010. Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
Supardi. 2014. Kinerja Guru. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada
The Liang Gie. 2000. Administrasi Perkantoran Modern. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Uno HB, Lamatenggo N. 2012. Teori Kinerja dan Pengukurannya. Cetakan pertama. Jakarta (ID): Bumi Aksara.
Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen.