Meretas Jalan Kritis: Privatisasi Pendidikan di Perguruan Tinggi Negeri Badan Hukum dalam Lensa Kantian
Abstract
This research aims to apply Immanuel Kant's ethical framework to examine the moral implications of the privatization of education on State Legal Entity Higher Education Institutions. The study identifies the primary emphasis of ethical analysis on structural changes, tuition fee increases, resource allocation, and stakeholders' perspectives using a literature review approach. Inconsistencies between education privatization policies and the values of universality, fair treatment, and moral responsibility are highlighted by research utilizing the Kantian framework. The research findings indicate that the PTNBH's policy to privatize education raises ethical issues, particularly related to resource allocation, accessibility, and the moral obligations of the institution. In conclusion, there are serious ethical consequences to the privatization of PTNBH education
Keywords: Critical Pathfinding, Education Privatization, Kantian Lens, Higher Education Institutions State Legal Entity
References
Azra, A. (2008). Indonesian higher education: from public good to privatization. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 1(2), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516230802094411
Baine, M. E. M. (2010). Privatisation of higher education in Uganda and the global gender justice ideal: uneasy bedfellows? Educational Review, 62(3), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2010.503603
Cone, L., & Brøgger, K. (2020). Soft privatisation: mapping an emerging field of European education governance. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 18(4), 374–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2020.1732194
Dinata, S. (2021). Epistimologi Kritisisme Immanuel Kant. Kanz Philosophia A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism, 7(2), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.20871/kpjipm.v7i2.183
Gusmian, I. (2014). Filsafat Moral Immanuel Kant : Suatu Tinjauan Paradigmatik. Al-A’raf : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Dan Filsafat, 11(2), 57. https://doi.org/10.22515/ajpif.v11i2.1190
Han, S. (2008). The concept of bürger in kant’s philosophy of law. Social Sciences in China. https://doi.org/10.1080/02529200802500326
Hardian, S., & Herho, S. (2016). Critique of Pure Reason: Sebuah Pengantar. In Chep Rahman. https://osf.io/preprints/inarxiv/v2bp9
Herianto, H., & Marsigit, M. (2023). Benang Merah Pemikiran ‘Kritik Akal Budi’Immanuel Kant. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/kfb6z
Kant, I., & Abror, R. H. (2022). Dasar-dasar Metafisika Moral= Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals. Insight Reference. https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/58018/
Kosunen, S. (2018). Access to higher education in Finland: emerging processes of hidden privatization. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 4(2), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2018.1487756
Kristiawan, M. (2016). Filsafat Pendidikan. In Yogyakarta: Valia Pustaka.
Madhloom, O. (2019). A normative approach to developing reflective legal practitioners: Kant and clinical legal education. The Law Teacher, 53(4), 416–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2019.1667082
Maksum, A. (2023). Filsafat Ilmu Sosial. In Filsafat Ilmu Sosial. Universitas Brawijaya Press. https://doi.org/10.11594/ubpress9786232967748
McKean, B. L. (2022). Kant, coercion, and the legitimation of inequality. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 25(4), 528–550. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13698230.2019.1658481
Mok, K. H., & Neubauer, D. (2016). Higher education governance in crisis: a critical reflection on the massification of higher education, graduate employment and social mobility. Journal of Education and Work, 29(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2015.1049023
Pizer, J. (2014). Skewering the Enlightenment: Alexander von Humboldt and Immanuel Kant as fictional characters. In Alexander von Humboldt’s Transatlantic Personae (pp. 29–44). Routledge.
https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315872025-3/skewering-enlightenment-alexander-von-humboldt-immanuel-kant-fictional-characters-john-pizer
Rahman, M. T. (2018). Pengantar filsafat sosial. Lekkas.
Richards, C. (2019). Higher education privatisation, internationalisation and marketisation: Singaporean versus Malaysian models of Asian education hub policy. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 49(3), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2017.1413638
Ritzer, G., & Smart, B. (2014). Handbook Teori Sosial. Nusamedia. https://lisa.poltekkesjakarta3.ac.id/perpustakaan/index.php?p=show_detail&id=14462&keywords
Smith, W., & Fine, R. (2015). Kantian Cosmopolitanism Today: John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas on Immanuel Kant’s Foedus Pacificum. King’s Law Journal, 15(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2004.11423640
Suaedi, S. (2016). Pengantar Filsafat Ilmu. Bogor: IPB Press.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298787398_Pengantar_Filsafat_Ilmu
Suyanto, B. (2013). Filsafat Sosial. In Yogyakarta: Aditya Media Publishing.
Thriyana, D. (2016). Categorical Imperative Immanuel Kant sebagai Landasan Filosofis Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 3(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v3n1.a5
Varaba, D. D., & Berebon, C. N. (2022). The Philosophy of Law of Immanuel Kant. Tamaddun. https://doi.org/10.33096/tamaddun.v20i2.166
Wattimena, R. A. A. (2010). Filsafat Kritis Immanuel Kant: Mempertimbangkan Kritik Karl Ameriks terhadap Kritik Immanuel Kant atas Metafisika. Evolitera. http://repository.wima.ac.id/id/eprint/4116/1/Kant.pdf
Winchip, E., Stevenson, H., & Milner, A. (2019). Measuring privatisation in education: methodological challenges and possibilities. Educational Review, 71(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1524197
Baine, M. E. M. (2010). Privatisation of higher education in Uganda and the global gender justice ideal: uneasy bedfellows? Educational Review, 62(3), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2010.503603
Cone, L., & Brøgger, K. (2020). Soft privatisation: mapping an emerging field of European education governance. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 18(4), 374–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2020.1732194
Dinata, S. (2021). Epistimologi Kritisisme Immanuel Kant. Kanz Philosophia A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism, 7(2), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.20871/kpjipm.v7i2.183
Gusmian, I. (2014). Filsafat Moral Immanuel Kant : Suatu Tinjauan Paradigmatik. Al-A’raf : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Dan Filsafat, 11(2), 57. https://doi.org/10.22515/ajpif.v11i2.1190
Han, S. (2008). The concept of bürger in kant’s philosophy of law. Social Sciences in China. https://doi.org/10.1080/02529200802500326
Hardian, S., & Herho, S. (2016). Critique of Pure Reason: Sebuah Pengantar. In Chep Rahman. https://osf.io/preprints/inarxiv/v2bp9
Herianto, H., & Marsigit, M. (2023). Benang Merah Pemikiran ‘Kritik Akal Budi’Immanuel Kant. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/kfb6z
Kant, I., & Abror, R. H. (2022). Dasar-dasar Metafisika Moral= Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals. Insight Reference. https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/58018/
Kosunen, S. (2018). Access to higher education in Finland: emerging processes of hidden privatization. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 4(2), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2018.1487756
Kristiawan, M. (2016). Filsafat Pendidikan. In Yogyakarta: Valia Pustaka.
Madhloom, O. (2019). A normative approach to developing reflective legal practitioners: Kant and clinical legal education. The Law Teacher, 53(4), 416–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2019.1667082
Maksum, A. (2023). Filsafat Ilmu Sosial. In Filsafat Ilmu Sosial. Universitas Brawijaya Press. https://doi.org/10.11594/ubpress9786232967748
McKean, B. L. (2022). Kant, coercion, and the legitimation of inequality. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 25(4), 528–550. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13698230.2019.1658481
Mok, K. H., & Neubauer, D. (2016). Higher education governance in crisis: a critical reflection on the massification of higher education, graduate employment and social mobility. Journal of Education and Work, 29(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2015.1049023
Pizer, J. (2014). Skewering the Enlightenment: Alexander von Humboldt and Immanuel Kant as fictional characters. In Alexander von Humboldt’s Transatlantic Personae (pp. 29–44). Routledge.
https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315872025-3/skewering-enlightenment-alexander-von-humboldt-immanuel-kant-fictional-characters-john-pizer
Rahman, M. T. (2018). Pengantar filsafat sosial. Lekkas.
Richards, C. (2019). Higher education privatisation, internationalisation and marketisation: Singaporean versus Malaysian models of Asian education hub policy. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 49(3), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2017.1413638
Ritzer, G., & Smart, B. (2014). Handbook Teori Sosial. Nusamedia. https://lisa.poltekkesjakarta3.ac.id/perpustakaan/index.php?p=show_detail&id=14462&keywords
Smith, W., & Fine, R. (2015). Kantian Cosmopolitanism Today: John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas on Immanuel Kant’s Foedus Pacificum. King’s Law Journal, 15(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2004.11423640
Suaedi, S. (2016). Pengantar Filsafat Ilmu. Bogor: IPB Press.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298787398_Pengantar_Filsafat_Ilmu
Suyanto, B. (2013). Filsafat Sosial. In Yogyakarta: Aditya Media Publishing.
Thriyana, D. (2016). Categorical Imperative Immanuel Kant sebagai Landasan Filosofis Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 3(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v3n1.a5
Varaba, D. D., & Berebon, C. N. (2022). The Philosophy of Law of Immanuel Kant. Tamaddun. https://doi.org/10.33096/tamaddun.v20i2.166
Wattimena, R. A. A. (2010). Filsafat Kritis Immanuel Kant: Mempertimbangkan Kritik Karl Ameriks terhadap Kritik Immanuel Kant atas Metafisika. Evolitera. http://repository.wima.ac.id/id/eprint/4116/1/Kant.pdf
Winchip, E., Stevenson, H., & Milner, A. (2019). Measuring privatisation in education: methodological challenges and possibilities. Educational Review, 71(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1524197
Published
2024-05-15
Section
Articles
Copyright (c) 2024 Jepri Utomo, Syamsu A. Kamaruddin, Arlin Adam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
