ANALISIS DAYA SAING DAN KINERJA EKSPOR ALAS KAKI INDONESIA DI PASAR EFTA PERIODE 2015-2024 MENGGUNAKAN PENDEKATAN RCA, RSCA, GROWTH RCA, EPD, DAN MSA

Authors

  • Krisna Rizky Satrio Universitas Widyatama
  • Rizqi Muttaqin Universitas Widyatama

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31539/9j9j2q47

Keywords:

Daya Saing Ekspor, Alas Kaki Indonesia, RCA, RSCA, Growth RCA, EPD, MSA, IE-CEPA, Pasar EFTA

Abstract

Indonesia berdiri sebagai pengekspor sepatu terkemuka secara global, namun menghadapi persaingan yang hebat, terutama dari Vietnam di pasar Asosiasi Perdagangan Bebas Eropa (EFTA). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi daya saing dan kinerja ekspor alas kaki Indonesia (HS 6403) di pasar EFTA dari 2015 hingga 2024 dengan membandingkan klasemen Indonesia dan Vietnam. Analisis ini menggunakan metode seperti Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA), Revealed Symmetric Comparative Advantage (RSCA), Growth RCA, Export Product Dynamics (EPD), dan Market Share Analysis (MSA). Temuan menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia mempertahankan keunggulan komparatif yang cukup stabil dengan skor RCA rata-rata 2,94 dan RSCA 0,49, meskipun masih tertinggal di belakang Vietnam, yang mencapai RCA rata-rata 5,10 dan RSCA 0,67. Analisis Pertumbuhan RCA mengungkapkan fluktuasi daya saing Indonesia, mencatat tingkat pertumbuhan rata-rata 2,08% per tahun, di bawah 4,62% Vietnam. Menurut analisis EPD, posisi ekspor Indonesia terutama dikategorikan sebagai Rising Star, sedangkan Vietnam menunjukkan berbagai posisi yang menunjukkan tahap kematangan pasar. Selama periode penelitian, pangsa pasar Indonesia mengalami peningkatan; namun, kesenjangan dengan Vietnam sebenarnya telah melebar. Implementasi Perjanjian Kemitraan Ekonomi Komprehensif Indonesia-EFTA (IE-CEPA) secara positif mempengaruhi pertumbuhan ekspor, meskipun belum secara signifikan mempersempit kesenjangan daya saing. Hasil ini menggarisbawahi perlunya meningkatkan daya saing struktural melalui spesialisasi ekspor yang lebih besar, peningkatan efisiensi produksi, dan kualitas produk yang unggul.

References

_SelProduct.aspx?nvpm=1%7c%7c%7c%7c%7c6403%7c%7c%7c4%7c1%7c1%7c2%7c1%7c1%7c2%7c1%7c%7c1

[23] Widodo, T. (2009). Comparative advantage: Theory, empirical measures and case studies. Review of Economic and Business Studies, 4(1), 57–82.[1] Abdulkadir, A., Afriana, D., & Azis, M. (2023). Analisis daya saing ek-spor alas kaki Indonesia dan Vi-etnam di pasar global. Jurnal Perdagangan Internasional, 8(2), 145–162.

[2] Association, E. F. T. (2022). EFTA Annual Report 2022. EFTA Secre-tariat.

[3] Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalisa-tion and revealed comparative ad-vantage. The Manchester School, 33(2), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x

[4] Balassa, B. (1977). “Revealed” comparative advantage revisited: An analysis of relative export shares of the industrial countries, 1953-1971. North-Holland Pub-lishing Company.

[5] Baldwin, R., & Jaimovich, D. (2012). Are Free Trade Agree-ments Contagious?

[6] Edwards, L., & Schoer, V. (2002). Measures of competitiveness: A dynamic approach to South Afri-ca’s trade performance in the 1990s. South African Journal of Economics, 70(6), 1008–1046.

[7] Esterhuizen, D. (2006). An evalua-tion of the competitiveness of the South African agribusiness sector.

[8] Gereffi, G. (1999). International trade and industrial upgrading in the ap-parel commodity chain. Journal of International Economics, 48(1), 37–70.

[9] Group, W. B. (2023). World Devel-opment Report. World Bank.

[10] Hartanto, A., Nugroho, B., & Widodo, S. (2021). Export growth and competitive dynamics: Indo-nesian fishery sector analysis. Ma-rine Policy, 125, 104–118.

[11] Krugman, P. R. (1979). Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competi-tion, and International Trade.

[12] Krugman, P. R., & Obstfeld, M. (2009). International Economics: Theory and Policy.

[13] Laursen, K. (2015). Revealed com-parative advantage and the alterna-tives as measures of international specialization. Eurasian Business Review, 5(1), 99–115.

[14] Muzayyin, A., Suharno, S., & Rifin, A. (2019). Market share analysis and revealed comparative ad-vantage of Indonesian palm oil in export markets. Jurnal Manajemen & Agribisnis, 16(2), 138–148.

[15] Nurkomariyah, S., & Sutjiatmo, B. P. (2023). Global footwear export competitive analysis: Indonesia and Vietnam. International Jour-nal of Trade and Commerce, 12(1), 45–62.

[16] Organization, W. T. (2011). World Trade Report 2011: The WTO and preferential trade agreements: From co-existence to coherence. WTO.

[17] Perdagangan, K. (2021). Indonesia-EFTA Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (IE-CEPA). Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia.

[18] Pomfret, R. (2007). Preferential Trade Agreements.

[19] Ricardo, D. (1817a). On the princi-ples of political economy and taxa-tion. John Murray.

[20] Ricardo, D. (1817b). On the Prin-ciples of Political Economy and Taxation.

[21] Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

[22] Trade Map - 2024 . (n.d.). Re-trieved January 31, 2026, from https://www.trademap.org/Country_SelProduct.aspx?nvpm=1%7c%7c%7c%7c%7c6403%7c%7c%7c4%7c1%7c1%7c2%7c1%7c1%7c2%7c1%7c%7c1

[23] Widodo, T. (2009). Comparative advantage: Theory, empirical measures and case studies. Review of Economic and Business Studies, 4(1), 57–82.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-11