Pergeseran Paradigma Pemidanaan bagi Tindak Pidana Korupsi Setelah Berlakunya Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Nasional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31539/h8vmvt66Keywords:
Paradigma Pemidanaan, Tindak Pidana Korupsi, KUHP Nasional, UU Tipikor, Pembaruan Hukum Pidana.Abstract
This study aims to examine the paradigm shift in the criminalization of corruption crimes following the enactment of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the National Criminal Code (KUHP). The method used is normative law with a statutory and conceptual approach, to contribute to the strengthening of a just corruption criminalization system in Indonesia. The results of the study indicate that the reform of Indonesian criminal law through the enactment of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the National Criminal Code (KUHP) marks a significant new chapter in the history of the Indonesian criminal justice system. The new KUHP is not simply a legislative change, but rather a reflection of a comprehensive legal paradigm transformation, from a repressive and punitive approach to a more humanistic, restorative, and equitable one. In conclusion, the successful implementation of the KUHP does not depend solely on normative changes but must be accompanied by structural, cultural, and ethical reforms in law enforcement. Law enforcement officials are required to adapt to new perspectives, while the public needs to be educated that justice is not always synonymous with punishment. Socialization, legal education, and public participation are key to the successful internalization of restorative values at the community level. Thus, the National Criminal Code (KUHP) is a symbol of Indonesia's legal sovereignty and a commitment to building a criminal justice system that is adaptive, just, and grounded in the values of Pancasila to ensure the protection and welfare of society as a whole.
Keywords: Punishment Paradigm, Corruption Crime, National Criminal Code, Corruption Law, Criminal Law Reform.
References
Arief, Barda Nawawi. (2010). RUU KUHP Baru Sebuah Restrukturisasi /Rekonstruksi Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Arief, Basrief. (2006). Korupsi dan Upaya Penegakan Hukum (Kapita Selekta). Jakarta: Adika Remaja Indonesia.
Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia RI. (2015). Draf Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia RI.
Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, J. (2023). Beyond procedural justice: Legitimacy, compliance and criminal justice. Annual Review of Criminology, 6, 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030920-112143
Mukti Fajar, N. D., & Achmad, Y. (2010). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum: Normatif & Empiris. Pustaka pelajar..
Fakhruddin. (2020). Perspektif Budaya Hukum dalam Perkembangan Kasus Korupsi di Indonesia. Dharmasisya Journal of Master of Law Program, 1(1). https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/dharmasisya/vol1/iss1/30/
Freiberg, A. (2021). Punishment and Penal Policy: An Introduction (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003027866
Ghozali, E., Harefa, A., & Sinaga, S. B. (2024). Kebijakan Formulasi Hukum Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023. Jurnal Hukum Justice, 3(2), 131–146. https://ejournal.ust.ac.id/index.php/JHJ/article/view/5356
Indriati, T., Rizkiah, N., & Mazhar, M. N. (2024). Rekodifikasi ketentuan tindak pidana korupsi dalam KUHP Nasional. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 10(2), 239–248. https://jurnal.kpk.go.id/index.php/integritas/article/view/1152/285
Setiawan, W. T., & Kurnianingsih, M. (2023). Menakar Pidana Kerja Sosial Sebagai Paradigma Baru Konsep Pemidanaan Perkara Korupsi Berbasis Determinisme Cultural. Justisi, 9(2), 116-132. https://doi.org/10.33506/jurnaljustisi.v9i2.2328
Muladi. (1995). Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Semarang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP.
Muntaha, M., Amelia, H., & Baskoro, N. E. (2021). Tinjauan Hukum terhadap Penanggulngan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Pemuliaan Hukum, 4(1), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.30999/jph.v4i1.1448
Rahman, F. (2024). Kontradiksi Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam KUHP Baru dengan Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Panjang Nasional Tahun 2005-2025. Bhirawa Law Journal, 5(1), 40-53. https://jurnal.unmer.ac.id/index.php/blj/article/view/12905.
Reksodiputro, M. (2020). Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Rajawali Pers.
Rozah, U., & Nashriana. (2023). Analisa Kebijakan Kriminal dan Filsafat Pemidanaan Non-Conviction Based Forfeiture of Stolen Assets dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 5(3), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v5i3.411-432
Sawung, D. A., Setiyowati, F. J., & Yusnika, M. (2024). Paradigma Baru Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam KUHP Nasional. Jurnal Suara Keadilan, 24(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.24176/sk.v24i1.11268
Tyler, T. R. (2021). Why people obey the law (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1n35d8r
Yaqin, A. (2024). Urgensi Kebijakan Pembaharuan Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Dinamika, 30(2), 10838-10852.
Yusuf, Muhammad. 2013. Merampas Aset Korupsi: Solusi Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Penerbit Kompas.
Zulfa, Eva Achjani. (2006). Pergeseran Paradigma Pemidanaan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 1(3), https://www.academia.edu/download/83131353/1179.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ade Kurnia, Harmelia Harmelia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
