Manajemen Pembinaan Keterampilan Berfikir Tingkat Tinggi untuk Meningkatkan Prestasi Siswa di Bidang Eksakta

  • Tuti Alawiyah Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Cirebon
  • Sutisna Sutisna Universitas Nahdatul Ulama Cirebon
  • Mohammad Dzakiyyuddin STAI Al-Masthuriyah Sukabumi

Abstract

This research aims to reveal and analyze the management of high-level thinking skills training at SMAN 2 Cirebon City for achievements in the exact sciences field. Consist of planning stage, implementation methods, handling obstacles, to the extent to which the results of this coaching can be seen from the achievements achieved by the participants. The research method used is a qualitative research method in case study, and uses a descriptive analysis approach. Data was collected through in-depth interviews, observation and documentation studies. The planning phase begins with a program meeting,  forming  a  committee,  determining  activities  and  facilities,  designing  a calendar, compiling monitoring instruments and a mechanism for measuring coaching results. Implementation process begins with program promotion and participant recruitment. Thinking skills training focuses on knowledge transfer abilities, critical and creative thinking, and problem solving. Field constraints are acted upon by the vice principal  in  charge of  quality improvement,  while in  coordination  with  the school principal. No serious obstacles were found that interfered with activity management. Internal improvements are carried out by evaluating improvements to operational standards and controlled quality standards for continuous internal quality assurance. The main result of this coaching is that the students' achievements are quite satisfactory because  they  have  achieved  achievements  in  the  field  of  exact  sciences  up  to  the national level.

 

Keywords: Training Management, Higher Order Thinking Skills, Student Achievement, Math And Science

References

Adams NE. 2015. Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive learning objectives. Journal of
the Medical Library Association : JMLA. Vol.103(3): p.152-153. http://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.103.3.010
2. Aini, Shofiana, Nur. 2020. Pengendalian mutu kelas khusus persiapan olimpiade untuk meningkatkan kompetensi kognitif siswa. (Studi Multisitus MTs Negeri 1
Jember dan MTs Negeri 7 Jember) [thesis]. Malang: Program Studi Manajemen
Pendidikan Islam Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim.
3. Almarcha MC, Martínez P, Balagué N, Hristovski R. 2022. Embodied transfer of knowledge using dynamic systems concepts in high school: A preliminary study. Human Movement Science. Vol.84(102974). ISSN 0167-9457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2022.102974
4. Andreas S. 2019. PISA 2018 Insight and interpretations. OECD publications 2019.
Tersedia: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/pisa-2018-results.htm
5. Anderson LW, Krathwohl DR. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Complete Edition. Longman, New York.
6. Balai Pengembangan Talenta Indonesia. 2023. Pedoman Olimpiade Sains Nasional
Jenjang SMA/MA Tahun 2023. Kemendikbudristek, Jakarta. p.6, 27
7. Bansu IA, Razali A. 2020. Higher-order-thinking skill (HOTS) bagi kaum milenial melalui inovasi pembelajaran matematika. CV IRDH, Malang.
8. Bloom BS. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I. Cognitive Domain. Longman, New York.
9. Hesun, Yueguang X, jari L. Exploring the structure of students’ scientific higher
order thinking in science education. Thinking Skills and Creativity.
2022;43(100999). ISSN 1871-871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.100999
10. John H. 2015. The History and Evolution of the PDSA Cycle [internet]. The Deming Institute. [cited 2023 April 15]. Tersedia: https://deming.org/the-history-and- evolution-of-the-pdsa-cycle/
11. Krathwohl DR. 2002. A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into
Practice. Vol.41(4): p.212, 215.
12. Lambert VA, Lambert CE. 2012. Qualitative Descriptive Research: An Acceptable Design. Pasific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research. Vol.16(4): p. 255-
256
13. Langford DP. 2015. Tool time for education: Choosing and implementing quality improvement tools. Langford International Inc. p.4-5.
14. Maria U. 2020. Ekstrakurikuler olimpiade sains dalam upaya meningkatkan prestasi peserta didik pada ajang kompetisi sains madrasah tingkat nasional di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah At-taqwa Bondowoso [skripsi]. Jember: IAIN Jember.
15. Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J. 2014. Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage Publications, London. p.14
16. Moen R, Norman C. 2009. The History of the PDCA Cycle. Proceedings of the 7th
ANQ Congress. Tokyo. p.1.
17. Mohamad M, Suratno, Ridwan. 2019. Upaya Peningkatan Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Siswa Melalui Penerapan Model Inquiri di SMA Negeri 9 Tanjung Jabung Timur. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi. Vol.19(2): 208-214. DOI:10.33087/jiubj.v19i2.653
18. Moleong, LJ. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung. p. 6
19. Mullis I, Martin MO, Foy P, Kelly DL, Fishbein B. 2020. TIMSS 2019 International Results in Mathematics and Science. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.. Tersedia: https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2019/international-results/
20. Nakakoji Y, Wilson R. 2020. Interdisciplinary Learning in Mathematics and Science: Transfer of Learning for 21st Century Problem Solving at University. Journal of Intelligence. Vol. 8(3):32. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence8030032
21. Nazir M. 2014. Metode Penelitian. Ghalia Indonesia. p.26, 64.
22. Nina DS. 2022. Mengenal HOTS dalam pendidikan. MNC Publishing.
23. Puspresnas. 2022. Rencana Strategis Pusat Prestasi Nasional 2020-2024.
Kemendikbudristek, Jakarta. p.22.
24. Putu MSS, Gustu NSA. 2020. Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Dalam
Menyelesaikan Soal HOTS Mata Pelajaran Matematika. JISD. Vol.4(2). pp.257-
269.
25. Rahman SA, Manaf NFA. 2017. A Critical Analysis of Bloom's Taxonomy in Teaching Creative and Critical Thinking Skills in Malaysia through English Literature. English Language Teaching. Vol.10(9). p.245-256. http://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n9p245
26. Ronald DM, Clifford LN. 2020. Circling back: Clearing up myths about the Deming cycle and seeing how it keeps evolving. The Deming Institute [internet]. The Deming Institute. [cited 2023 April 15]. Tersedia: https://deming.org/wp- content/uploads/2020/06/circling-back.pdf
27. Sugiyono. 2019. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta, Bandung. p. 17
28. Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta, Bandung. p.15.
29. Tim GTK Dikdas. 2021. Pedagogi, Modul Belajar Mandiri calon guru PPPK.
Kemendikbud: Dirjen GTK. Tersedia: https://cdn- gbelajar.simpkb.id/s3/p3k/Pedagogi/Modul%20Bahan%20Belajar%20-
%20Pedagogi%20-%202021.pdf
30. Tri W, Megawati, Aprizan, Nurlev A. 2019. Peningkatan kompetensi siswa melalui pembinaan olimpiade Sains (OSN). Jurnal Warta Lembaga Pengabdian pada Masyarakat. Vol.22(2):p.67-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.23917/warta.v22i2.8619
31. Yoki A, Ari P, Reisky B, Zamroni. 2018. Buku Pegangan Pembelajaran Berorientasi pada Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. Kemendikbud: Dirjen GTK. p.23-26
Published
2023-12-31
Abstract viewed = 5 times
pdf downloaded = 9 times