Penerapan Teaching Game for Understanding terhadap Hasil Belajar Permainan Bola Voli

  • Fahmi Hadi Sebila pasca sarjana universitas pendidikan indonesia
  • Nurlan Kusmaedi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Tite Juliantine Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Abstract

This research aims to examine the effect of the Teaching Game For Understanding (TGFU) learning model by using a modified ball to hours volleyball learning outcomes. The participants of this study were Social Sciences students of SMA Negeri 3 Sukabumi City, as many as 90 students were divided into 3 groups. The first group of students who were given TGFU treatment with a modified ball, the second TGFU with normal ball, and the third group without treatment. The method used in this research is The Matching-Only pre-test-posttest control group design and teaching with ball modification. The instrument used in this study are the GPAI. The results of this study (1) there is a development of the volleyball game results with the TGFU learning model using a modified ball (2) there is no development of volleyball game results with the TGFU learning model using normal balls. In conclusion, the delivery of the TGFU learning program using modified balls increases volleyball learning outcomes.

Keywords: Teaching Game for Understanding, Volleyball.

References

Alison, S., & Thorpe, R. (1997). A comparison of the effectiveness of two approaches to teaching games within physical education. A skills approach versus a games for understanding approach. Journal of Physical Education, 28.

Bailey, R. (2006). Physical education and sport in schools: A review of benefits and outcomes. Journal of School Health, 76(8), 397–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2006.00132.x

Bracco, E., Lodewyk, K., Morrison, H., Bracco, E., Lodewyk, K., & A, H. M. (2019). A case study of disengaged adolescent girls ’ experiences with teaching games for understanding in physical education. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education, 10(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/25742981.2019.1632724

Butler, J. I. (2013). Teacher Responses to Teaching Games for Understanding. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 67(9), 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1996.10604851

Chase, M. A., Ewing, M. E., Lirgg, C. D., & George, T. R. (1994). The Effects of Equipment Modification on Children’s Self-Efficacy and Basketball Shooting Performance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65(October). https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1994.10607611

Dania, A., & Kossyva, I. (2017). European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science EFFECTS OF A TEACHING GAMES FOR UNDERSTANDING PROGRAM ON PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS ’ PHYSICAL ACTIVITY PATTERNS. 3(2), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.400591

Fani, R. A., & Sukoco, P. (2019). Volleyball learning media using method of teaching games for understanding adobe flash-based. Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research, 2(1), 34–50.

Febrianta, Y., & Purwokerto, U. M. (2017). An Alternative to Learning Basketball Game Using TGFU ( Teaching Games For Understanding ). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 109(Aecon), 313–319.

Gabriela Olosová, L. Z. (2015). IMMEDIATE AND RETENTION EFFECTS OF TEACHING GAMES FOR UNDERSTANDING APPROACH ON BASKETBALL KNOWLEDGE. Acta Facultatis Educationis Physicae Universitatis Comenianae, 55(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1515/afepuc-2015-0005

Ha, A. S. (2016). Student Learning Outcome and Teachers’ Autonomy Support Toward Teaching Games for Understanding Through Adopting Accessible Technology and Alternative Sport Equipment: An Asian Experience. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 87(sup1), S12–S13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2016.1200415

Hortigüela Alcalá, D., & Hernando Garijo, A. (2017). Teaching Games for Understanding: A Comprehensive Approach to Promote Student’s Motivation in Physical Education. Journal of Human Kinetics, 59(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0144

James Mandigo, Jay Tredway, A. K. L. (2018). Examining the Impact of a Teaching Games for Understanding Approach on the Development of Physical Literacy Using the Passport for Life Assessment Tool Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education.

Lee, W. A. S. S., Rengasamy, S., Hooi, L. B., Varatharajoo, C., & Azeez, M. I. K. (2015). The Effectiveness of Teaching Games for the Improvement of the Hockey Tactical Skills and the State of Self-Confidence among 16 Years Old Students. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Sport and Health Sciences, 9(7), 2333–2339.

Nopembri, S. (2019). Physical Education Teachers ’ Interpretations of Teaching Games for Physical Education Teachers ’ Interpretations of Teaching Games for Understanding Model. International Conference on Sports Science, Health and Physical Education (ICSSHPE 2017), (January 2017), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.5220/0007054400240029

Oslin, J. L., Mitchell, S. A., & Griffin, L. L. (1998). The Game Performance Assessment Instrument ( GPAI ): Development and Preliminary Validation. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17, 231–243.

Pellett T.L., Henschel-Pellett H.A., H. J. M. (1994). INFLUENCE O F BALL W E I G H T O N JUNIOR H I G H SCHOOL GIRLS ’ VOLLEYBALL PERFORMANCE ’. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78, 1379–1384.

Stolz, S., & Pill, S. (2013). Teaching games and sport for understanding: Exploring and reconsidering its relevance in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 20(1), 36–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X13496001

Webb, P. I., Pearson, P. J., & Forrest, G. (2006). Teaching Games for Understanding ( TGf U ) in primary and secondary physical education. ICHPER-SD International Conference for Health, Physical Education, Recreation, Sport and Dance, 1st Oceanic Congress, Wellington, New Zealand, (October), 1–4.
Published
2020-12-22
How to Cite
Sebila, F., Kusmaedi, N., & Juliantine, T. (2020). Penerapan Teaching Game for Understanding terhadap Hasil Belajar Permainan Bola Voli. Gelanggang Olahraga: Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Dan Olahraga, 4(1), 23-30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31539/jpjo.v4i1.1308
Abstract viewed = 1 times
pdf downloaded = 0 times