Efektivitas Metode Drill vs. Konvensional dalam Meningkatkan Akurasi dan Konsistensi Topspin Tenis Meja

Abstract

This study aims to investigate and compare the influence of drill and conventional learning methods on the learning outcomes of the accuracy and consistency of topspin strokes in table tennis. This study uses a quasi-experimental design with a pre-test/post-test two-group design model. The research sample consisted of 40 students of the Physical Education, Health, and Recreation (Penjaskesrek) study program of the Indragiri Islamic University (UNISI) who were randomly divided into two groups: the drill method group (n=20) and the conventional method group (n=20). The intervention was carried out for six weeks. The instrument used is a test of topspin accuracy and consistency that has been validated and tested for reliability. Data were analyzed using the Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) to compare the post-test scores  of the two groups by controlling the pre-test scores  as covariates. The results of the analysis showed that there were statistically significant differences between the two groups in the accuracy and consistency variables after the intervention. The group that received conventional method treatment showed  a significantly higher average corrected post-test score  compared to the drill method group. These findings indicate that conventional methods, which have the potential for higher practice variability and richer instructional feedback, are superior in developing strong motor schemas and adaptive abilities for topspin strokes  compared to drill methods  that are repetitive and isolated. The conclusions of this study provide practical implications for physical education coaches and teachers to prioritize instructional approaches that integrate the variety and context of play in training complex technical skills.

Keywords: Drill Method, Conventional Method, Accuracy, Consistency, Table Tennis Topspin