Analisis Proses Berpikir Refraktif dalam Pemecahan Masalah bagi Siswa Ditinjau dari Daya Juang Produktif
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the refractive thinking process of students in problem solving in terms of the level of productive fighting power. This type of research is qualitative descriptive research. The subjects of this study included 3 students of class X SMA Laboratorium Salatiga who were taken from students who had high, medium, and low fighting power. The research instruments included human instruments (researchers), essay tests in the form of mathematical application problems, namely the problem of delivering goods, field notes, and documentation. The analysis and conclusion stages used data triangulation techniques. The results of this study indicate that the stages of refractive thinking with medium and low fighting power include 5 stages, namely confusion, investigation, constructive activity, evaluation and decision making. The stages of refractive thinking of students with high fighting power include 4 stages, namely investigation, constructive activity, evaluation and decision making. In conclusion, students with high fighting power do not experience confusion (perplexity) in solving mathematical problems and do not need help from others. While students with medium and low fighting power go through all five stages in solving mathematical problems with the help of others.
Keywords: Refractive Thinking, Productive Fighting Power, Mathematical Problem Solving
References
Armelia, M. N., & Ismail, I. (2021). Pengaruh Self-Regulated Learning terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Matematis Siswa. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 1757-1768. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i2.687
Fuady, A. (2017). Berfikir Reflektif dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. JIPMat, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat. v1i2.1236
Haryati, T., Nindiasari, H., & Sudiana, R. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan dan Disposisi Berpikir Reflektif Matematis Siswa Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 10(2), 146–158. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v 10i2.2039
Isna, N. N., & Kurniasari, I. (2016). Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Matematika Siswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 1(5), 21–29 https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/inde x.php/mathedunesa/article/view/ 24428/22351
Kriswandani, K., & Kusuma, D. (2022). Proses Berpikir Refraktif Mahasiswa Bergaya Kognitif Intuitive dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Kompleks. Jurnal Karya Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.26714/jkpm.9. 2.2022.61-75
Markhamah, N. (2021). Pengembangan Soal Berbasis HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills) pada Kurikulum 2013. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 1(2), 385–418. https://doi.org/10.14421/njpi.20 21.v1i2-8
Mefiana, S. A., Herman, T., & Hasanah, A. (2023). Pemahaman Matematis Siswa Ditinjau dari Daya Juang Produktif. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 2368–2381. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendek ia.v7i3.2552
Melani, R., Herman, T., Hasanah, A., Mefiana, S. A., & Samosir, C.M. (2023). Kemampuan Membuat Model Matematika dan Daya Juang Produktif Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pemecahan Masalah. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 2391–2404. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendek ia.v7i3.2545
Nisa, L., & Fuad, S. (2021). Proses Berpikir Refraktif Siswa Climber dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika. Education Researcb and Evaluaton, 3(3), 127–135. http://www.incoilsfdpdiktis2021 .iaipd- nganjuk.ac.id/index.php/incoils/ article/download/246/185
Noviriani, E. (2021). Eksplorasi Kecerdasan Daya Juang (Adversity Quotient) Mahasiswa Akuntansi dalam Tinjauan Fenomenologi. Sebatik, 25(2), 418–425. https://doi.org/10.46984/sebatik. v25i2.1670
Noviyanti, E. D., Purnomo, D., & Kusumaningsih, W. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif. Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 57-68. https://journal.upgris.ac.id/index.php/imajiner/article/view/7097
Pagano, M., & Roselle, L. (2009). Beyond Reflection Through An Academic Lens: Refraction and International Experiential Education. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 18(Ii), 217–229. http://0- search.ebscohost.com.umhblib.
Ramadhani, C. I., Mailizar, M., & Elizar, E. (2024). Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Matematis Siswa pada Materi Aritmatika Sosial. Jurnal Peluang, 12(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.24815/jp.v12i1.37987
Rusminati, S., & Styanada, G. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Soal Bangun Ruang Berbasis HOTS Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Matematika Siswa SD. Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 3(3), 408– 412 https://www.e- journal.my.id/jsgp/article/view/ 417
Saputra, H. (2020). Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Matematis. Perpustakaan IAI Agus Salim Metro Lampung, 2(April), 1–7. https://osf.io/v7g2k/download
Setyaningsih, R. (2019). Proses Metakognisi Mahasiswa dengan Tipe Adversity Quotient (Aq) Quitters dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika. Satya Widya, 34(2), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.sw.20 18.v34.i2.p112-124
Siswono, T. Y. E. (2016). Berpikir Kritis dan Berpikir Kreatif sebagai Fokus Pembelajaran Matematika. Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika (Senatik 1), 11–16. https://www.academia.edu/download/51806316/1046-1019-1-PB.pdf
Wardani, W. S. K., & Saidiyah, S. (2016). Daya Juang Mahasiswa Asing. Psympathic : Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 3(2), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.15575/psy.v3i 2.1111
Wirajaya, L. (2019). Eksperimentasi Penerapan Model Pembelajaran The Power of Two Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. FONDATIA, 3(1), 73-82. https://doi.org/10.36088/fondatia.v3i1.197
Wulandari, I. P. (2019). Berpikir Kritis Matematis dan Kepercayaan Diri Siswa Ditinjau dari Adversity QUOTI. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 2, 176. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/in dex.php/prisma/article/view/292
Copyright (c) 2024 Gracia Gracia, Kriswandani Kriswandani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
