Profil Pemecahan Masalah Materi Pecahan Siswa Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient (AQ)

Sri Deviana; Dasa Ismaimuza; Sutji Rochaminah; Muhammad Fachri B. Paloloang

doi:10.31539/judika.v8i1.14327

Sri Deviana Universitas Tadulako
Dasa Ismaimuza Universitas Tadulako, Palu
Sutji Rochaminah Universitas Tadulako, Palu
Muhammad Fachri B. Paloloang Universitas Tadulako, Palu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31539/judika.v8i1.14327

Abstract

This study aims to describe the problem-solving profiles of eighth-grade students in the fraction material at SMPN Model Terpadu Madani, based on adversity quotient. The subjects of this study consist of 3 students selected based on the results of the ARP questionnaire and the recommendation of the mathematics teacher. The results of this study show that: (1) The problem-solving profile of students in the climber category can understand the problem by stating what is unknown and what data is given. However, they are less complete in writing down the known data from the problem, designing a well-structured solution plan, carrying out the plan as initially created, answering correctly, and checking their answer using a different method. (2) The problem-solving profile of students in the camper category can understand the problem by determining what is unknown and identifying the given data, designing a good and complete solution plan, carrying out the plan as initially made, and answering correctly, but they do not check their answer afterward. (3) The problem-solving profile of students in the quitter category can understand the problem by stating what is unknown and what data is given. However, they are less complete in writing down the known data from the problem, designing a good and complete solution plan, failing to implement the plan as initially made, not answering correctly, and not checking their answer afterward. In conclusion, there are 3 categories of students that require different treatment and attention from the teacher. Climber students need more attention in writing down the known data and checking their answer using a different method. Camper students need to be encouraged to check their answer after completing the problem, and quitter students require more intensive guidance in understanding the problem and carrying out the solution plan correctly.

Keywords: Profile, Problem Solving, Fractions, Adversity Quotient.

References

Arsanti, M., Zulaeha, I., Subiyantoro, S., & Haryati, N. (2021). Tuntutan Kompetensi 4C Abad 21 dalam Pendidikan di Perguruan Tinggi untuk Menghadapi Era Society 5.0. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana UNNES, 319–324. http://pps.unnes.ac.id/prodi/prosiding-pascasarjana-unnes/

Badriyah, A. Z., Yuliawati, F., & Khoirini’mah, S. M. (2024). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Matematika Materi Bilangan Satuan. Jurnal Analisa, 10(1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.15575/ja.v10i1.35617

Baharullah, Wahyuddin, Usman, M. R., & Nurmia, S. (2022). Profil Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient (Aq). AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 1039–1051. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i2.4766

Febrianti, T., Zakiah, N. E., & Ruswana, A. M. (2022). Profil Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP pada Materi Lingkaran Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient (AQ). J-KIP (Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan), 3(2), 420–427. https://doi.org/10.25157/j-kip.v3i2.6569

Hofifah, F., Siskawati, F. S., & Irawati, T. N. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMK Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. JURNAL e-DuMath, 9(1), 40-46. https://doi.org/10.52657/je.v9i1.1939

Indriani, H., & Noordyana, M. A. (2022). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa pada Materi Penyajian Data di Desa Bojong. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v2i1.1091

Jaswandi, L., & Kartiani, B. S. (2022). Pembelajaran Matematika Dengan Metode Penemuan Terbimbing untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Transformasi: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Non Formal Informal, 7(2), 81-86. https://doi.org/10.33394/jtni.v7i2.4888

Karlimah, (2010). Pengembangan Kemampuan Komunikasi dan Pemecahan Masalah Serta Disposisi Matematis Mahasiswa PGSD Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah. Disertai UPI: Tidak Diterbitkan

Kusumawardani, N. N., & Sulaiman, R. (2020). Students’ Critical Thinking Profiles in Solving Mathematical Problems Based on Adversity Quotient (AQ). Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Volume, 9(1). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/890e/7f9bb4447b336f521a05a744978863906d11.pdf

Malik, I., Mulyono, M., & Mariani, S. (2018). Ability in Mathematics Problem Solving Based in Adversity Quotient. Jurnal Profesi Keguruan, 4(1), 37–41. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpk/article/view/18878

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook

Naimnule, M., Kehi, Y. J., & Bone, D. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Berdasarkan Langkah-Langkah Polya Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient Tipe Quitter, Camper dan Climber pada Siswa Kelas Viii Smp. Jurnal Eduscience, 9(2), 428-441. https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v9i2.2957

NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards For School Mathematics. In Kathleen Beall

Polya, G. (1973). How To Solve It. A New Aspect Of Mathematical Method. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press

Rizal M, M., Tayeb, T., & Latuconsina, N. (2016). Efektivitas Penerapan Metode Ekspositori Berbasis Kuis Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas VIII MTsN Ma’rang Kabupaten Pangkep. Jurnal Matematika dan Pembelajaran, 4(2), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2016v4n2a2

Ruseffendi, E.T. (2006). Pengantar kepada Membantu Guru Mengembangkan Kompetensinya dalam Pengajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkan CBSA. Bandung : Tarsito

Salahuddin, M., & Ramdhani, L. (2022). Berpikir Reflektif Siswa SMP dalam Memecahkan Masalah Geometri. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling (JPDK), 4(3), 266-2673. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v4i3.5863

Sari, C. K., Sutopo, S., & Aryuna, D. R. (2016). The Profile of Students’ Thinking in Solving Mathematics Problems Based on Adversity Quotient. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 1(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v1i1.1784

Sari, I., Marwan, M., & Hajidin, H. (2019). Students’ Thinking Process in Solving Mathematical Problems in Build Flat Side Spaces of Material Reviewed from Adversity Quotient. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 2(2), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.29103/mjml.v2i2.1468

Silvana. (2020). Profil Pemecahan Masalah SPLDV Melalui Tahapan Polya Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Kemampuan Matematika pada Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Kristen Bala Keselamatan Palu. Skripsi Tidak diterbitkan. Palu : Universitas Tadulako

Stoltz, P.G. (2000). Adversity Quotient : Mengubah Hambatan Menjadi Peluang. Alih Bahasa : Hermaya, T. Jakarta : Grasindo

Totok Suprayitno. (2018) Pendidikan di Indonesia belajar dari Hasil PISA 2018

Yani, M., Ikhsan, M., & Marwan, M. (2016). Proses Berpikir Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v2i1.491

Rahmi, D., Putra, M. A., & Kurniati, A. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis berdasarkan Adversity Quotient (AQ) siswa SMA. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 7(2), 85-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/sjme.v7i2.13306