Bagaimana Gaya Kognitif Siswa Mempengaruhi Proses Berpikir dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31539/p7et5533Keywords:
gaya kognitif, pemecahan masalah matematika, berpikir kritis, kreativitas, pembelajaran berbasis proyekAbstract
ABSTRACT
This study aims to analyze how students’ cognitive styles influence their thinking processes in mathematical problem solving through a Literature Review approach using the PRISMA method (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). The review identifies and synthesizes various studies related to the relationship between cognitive styles—such as field-dependent (FD), field-independent (FI), reflective, and impulsive—and students’ critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, and communication skills in mathematics learning. The analysis results show that cognitive style has a significant influence on students’ thinking strategies, mathematical representations, and metacognitive abilities. Students with FI and reflective styles tend to think more analytically and systematically, while FD and impulsive students demonstrate strengths in cooperation and communication when provided with scaffolding support. Project-Based Learning (PjBL) and Problem-Based Learning (PBL) are found to be more effective when aligned with students’ individual cognitive styles. Furthermore, evaluation of logic-based educational programs and internal quality assurance systems is necessary to ensure adaptive and sustainable learning. Overall, understanding students’ cognitive styles is crucial for educators in designing flexible, reflective, and learner-centered teaching strategies to optimize higher-order thinking skills in the 21st-century education era, So it can be concluded that cognitive style can significantly influence students' thinking processes regarding thinking strategies and mathematical representation.
Keywords: Cognitive Style, Mathematical Problem Solving, Critical Thinking, Creativity, Project-Based Learning
References
Booker, Z. (2020). A Revised Logic Model for Educational Program Evaluation. Jurnal Metode Statistik Terapan Moderen 18(2):2-14. https://jmasm.com/index.php/jmasm/article/view/1062
Cintamulya, I., I. Murtini, W. Warli. (2024). Optimasi Keterampilan Kolaborasi dan Komunikasi Calon Guru Biologi Berdasrkan Gaya Kognitif Melalui Tugas Penulisan Artikel. Penelitian Pendidikan Partisifatif 11(6): 262-279. https://share.google/ezbCRiGd4AvSFKh7C
Evendi, E., Kusaeri, A., Kusaeri, A., Pardi, M., Sucipto, L., Bayani, F., & Prayogi, S. (2022). Assessing Students' Critical Thinking Skills Viewed from Cognitive Style: Study on Implementation of Problem-Based e-Learning Model in Mathematics Courses. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(7). https://www.ejmste.com/article/assessing-students-critical-thinking-skills-viewed-from-cognitive-style-study-on-implementation-of-12161
Habeahan, et al. (2025). Pengaruh Gaya Kognitif terhadap Kemampuan Abstraksi dan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika dalam Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah. Jurnal Pendidikan 5(1): 554-561. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315903116_HUBUNGAN_GAYA_KOGNITIF_DENGAN_KEMAMPUAN_PEMECAHAN_MASALAH_MATEMATIKA_SISWA
Harjono, A., Busyairi, A., & Prayogi, S. (2024). Implementation of Project-Based Learning to Enhance The Creativity of Prospective Physics Teachers in Generating Learning Media Viewed from Cognitive Styles. International Journal of Education and Practice, 12(2), 253-267.. https://archive.conscientiabeam.com/index.php/61/article/view/3676
Herlina, S., Wahyuni, R., Julianti, D., & Novianti, A. (2024). Bransford & Stein Theory: Mathematical Thinking Process of Prospective Mathematics Teacher Students in Solving Statistical Problems Based on Cognitive Learning Style. Jurnal Prisma, 13(2), 245-258.https://jurnal.unsur.ac.id/prisma/article/view/4844
Lubna, Suhirman, & Prayogi, S. . (2023). Evaluation Of STEM Students’ Critical Thinking in Terms of Cognitive Style Through Problem-Based Distance Learning. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 10(3), 557–568. https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v10i3.4972
Nur, A. S., Kartono, K., Zaenuri, Z., & Rochmad, R. (2022). The Lateral Thinking Processes in Solving Mathematical Word Problems Reviewed At Adversity Quotient And Reflective Cognitive Style. Infinity Journal, 11(2), 223-236. https://www.e-journal.stkipsiliwangi.ac.id/index.php/infinity/article/view/2624
Nurmutia, H. E. (2019). Pengaruh Gaya Kognitif terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa. Edumatika: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 98-103. https://doi.org/10.32939/ejrpm.v2i2.443
Purnamasari, I., Setiawan, W. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Siswa. Journal of Medives: Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang 3(2): 542554. https://doi.org/10.31331/medivesveteran.v3i2.771
Salam, M. (2023). Strategi Konflik Kognitif: Representasi Matematika Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif Musharafa Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 12(2): 339-350 https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jpgsd/article/view/14019/0 https://share.google/jV8vMDnsqpNthbQkc
Setiyani, S., Gunawan, G., Waluya, S. B., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Cahyono, A. N., Mutia, M., & Yunianto, W. (2025). The Role of Scaffolding in Shaping Reflective Mathematical Thinking of Dependent Field Students in Numeracy Problems. Infinity Journal, 14(2), 531-550. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v14i2.p531-550
Supriadi. N. (2023). Pengembangan Keterampilan Kritis dan Kreatif Melalui Pendidikan Berbasis Masalah: Pendekatan Praktis di Kelas (Studi pada Salah Satu Sekolah Dasar). Jurnal Pendidikan west sciene 1(5): 316-316-327. https://share.google/1AmSa6vVwMvhiu9nK
Thaira, (2024). Analisis Keterampila Komunikasi dan Keterampilan. jurnal pendidikan Biologi 7(1) https://share.google/wkVfvlbRi2xjC263Z
Yanti, A. W., Budayasa, I. K., & Sulaiman, R. (2021). Adaptive Reasoning, Mathematical Problem Solving and Cognitive Styles. Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika, 5(2), 332-339.https://share.google/Eks30oPosdidUnNcC
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Emi Anggriani, Suradi Suradi, Danial Danial

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

