Students' English Learning Style in Lubuklinggau

  • Yulfi Yulfi Universitas PGRI Silampari
  • Syaprizal Syaprizal

Abstract

This research aimed to explain the students' English learning style of eighth-grade students of MTs Negeri 1 Lubuklinggau. The method applied in this research was the descriptive quantitative method. All the eighth-grade students of MTs Negeri 1 Lubuklinggau in the academic year of 2018/2019 were this research's subject. The population was 244 students. Whiles sample of this research was taken by using simple random sampling. There were 30 students in class VIII as the sample result. To get the data, the researcher used a questionnaire and interview. The data were analyzed by describing students' answers and dividing students' English learning styles into three categories: 1) Visual Learning Style, 2) Auditory Learning Style, and 3) Kinesthetic Learning Style. Based on the result of data analysis, the researchers found that: 1) 10 (33.33%) students as visual learners, 2) 13 (43.33%) students as auditory learners, and 3) 7 (23.33%%) students as kinesthetic learners. In conclusion, the auditory learning style was the most frequently used style by the students. Whereas the least frequently learning style used by VIII.6 class of MTs Negeri 1 Lubuklinggau was kinesthetic.

Keywords: English, Learning style, Students.

References

Albeta, S.W., Haryati, S., Futra, D., Aisyah, R., Desviana, A. (2021). The Effect of Learning Styles on Students’ Learning Performance During the Covid 19 Pandemic. JTK: Jurnal Tadris Kimiya, 6(1), 115-123, https://doi.org/10.15575/jtk.v6i1.12603

Ariani, S., Valiantien, N,M., Rahmawaty, N. (2021). Students’ Language Learning Style Preferences at English Literature Study Program. CaLLs Journal, 7(1), 103-112, https://doi.org/10.30782/calls.v7i1.5160

Berlianda, A.R.A., & Indriani, L. (2020). An Analysis of EFL Learners' Learning Style in Online Speaking Class. JRPP Journal. 3(2), 322-327.

Flemming, N.D. & Bonwell, C. (2019). How do I learn Best? A Learners’ Guide to Improve Learning. USA. Author.

Helena, C. T. & Sreenidhi, S. K. (2017). Style of Learning Based on the Research of Fernald, Keller, Orton, Gillingham, Stillman, Montessori and Neil Fleming. International Journal for Innovative Research Multidisciplinary Field, 3 (4) 17-25.

Huang, T, C. (2019). Do Different Learning Style Make a Difference When It Comes to Creativity? An Empirical Study. Computers in Human Behavior,100, 252-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.003

Hermini, H., Upa, R., Wahyono, D. (2021). Students’ Learning Style in Higher Education. Ethical Lingua, 8(1), 159-167, Retrieved from https://ethicallingu.org/25409190/article/view/276

Ida, M, F. & Maksum, H. (2020). Contribution of Learning Style, Learning Creativity and Exploratory Interest to Students' Simulation and Digital Communication Learning Outcomes during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Education and Technology, 4(4), 404-414, https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v4i4.29701

Manalu, L, Y. Sutrisno & Hasanah, U. (2019). Hubungan Gaya Belajar dengan Hasil Belajar Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Dinamika Sekolah Dasar, 1(1), 1-13, https://doi.org/doi.org/10.21009/DSD.XXX

Rachmah, A Elvia. (2018). A Preferred Learning Styles of the Students of SMK Muhammadiyah 2 Surakarta. Online Journal Article Publication_ajeng.pdf accessed on 9 May 2020

Shah, Kanchi. (2013). How Different Are the Students and Their Learning Style? Online journal www.researchgate.net accessed on 21 September 2021

Wahab, I., Nuraeni. (2020). The Analysis of Students’ Learning Style. CELTICS Journal. 3(1), 41-46, https://doi.org/10.46918/seltics.v3i1.509

Wang, R, Lowe, R. Newton, S. Kocaturk, T. (2020). Task Complexity and Learning Styles in Situated Virtual LearningEnvirontments for Contraction Higher Education. Automation in Construction, 113. 103148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103148

Zagoto, M.M, Yarni, N., Dakhi, O. (2019). Perbedaan Individu dari Gaya Belajarnya Seta Implikasinya Dalam Pembelajaran. Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 2(2), 259-265
Published
2022-06-28
Abstract viewed = 59 times
PDF downloaded = 76 times