Analisis High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Taksonomi Menganalisis Permasalahan Fisika
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to get the measurement result as a description of higher order thinking skill in taxonomy to analyze physics problem in SMA XI class. This study is descriptive qualitative through three stages, namely: initial development of the instrument, content validation and empirical, and measurement. The research has been conducted in the region of Central Bengkulu Regency. The instrument used has been validated by the expert. An empirical valiadation test was conducted by 95 students. A valid instrument is used to measure student's higher order thinking skills. The number of learners measured using a total sampling of 148 learners. The measurement result shows very high analyze ability 1 student or 0,5 percent, ability analyze high 59 student or 40 percent, ability analyze analyze 62 student or 42 percent, ability analyze low 25 student or 17 percent, ability analyze very low 1 student or 0, 5 percent. On the average it can be concluded that higher order thinking skills on taxonomy analyze students in Bengkulu Tengah included in medium criterion.
Keyword: HOTS, Analyze, Physics
References
Arwood, E.L. (2011). Language Function an Introduction to Pragmatic Assessment and Intervention for Higher Order Thinking and Better Literacy. Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Education Objectives Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York : David MsKay.
Bogan, Y. K.H., &Porter, R.C. (2005). On the Ball with Higher-Order Thinking. ProQuest Research Library, 36, 46-47.
Brookhart, S.M. (2010) Assess higher-order thingking skills in your classroom. Alexandria : ASCD.
Costa, Arthur L. (1991). Developing Minds: Programs for Teaching Thinking (Rev.Ed). Volume 2. Alexandria : ASCD.
Derry, G.N. (1999). What Science is and How it Works. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Freud & Wilson. (2003). Statistical Methods. London: Academic Press.
Irianto, Agus. (2012). Statistik : Konsep Dasar, Aplikasi, dan Pengembangannya. Jakarta: Kencana.
Jennifer L., Mestre. J. P., & Ross. B.H. (2012). Impact of a Short Intervention on Novices’ Categorization Criteria [versi elektronik].. Physics Education Research, 8,1.
Gardner, Howard. (2013). Multiple Intelligences (terjemahanYelvi Andri Zaimul). New York: Basic Books. (buku asli terbitan tahun 2006).
Kohl, P. B., & Finkelstein. N.D. (2008). Patterns of Multiple Representation Use by Experts and Novices During Physics Problem Solving [versi elektronik]. Physics Education Research, 4, 11-12
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview [versi elektronik]. Theory into Practice, 41, 2014.
Kuswana.W.S. (2013). Taksonomi Berpikir. Bandung: Rosda Karya.
Lichona, Thomas. (2012). Mendidik untuk Membentuk Karakter (terjemahan juma abdu wamungo). New York: (buku asli diterbitkan tahun 1989).
Miri, Barak., & David, B.C., & Uri, Zoller. (2007). Purposely Teaching for the Promotion of Higher- order Thinking Skills: A Case of Critical Thinking. Springer Science. 37,366.
Nitko, A.J., & Brookhart, S.M. (2011). Educational assessment of students (6rd ed.). Boston : Pearson
OECD. PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment. [online]. Tersedi: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/ 7 desember 2016]
Rianawati. Ida. (2011). Berfikir Tingkat Tinggi (Higher Order Thinking). [Online]. Tersedia: http://idarianawaty.blogspot.com/2011/08/berpikir-tingkat-tinggi-higher-order.html [14 Februari 2014]
TIMSS & PIRL. (2016). Trends International Mathematics and Science Study. Tersedia di https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/
Williams, J.D. (2011). How Science Works Teaching and Learning in the Science Classroom. British :Continum.
Zuchdi, Darmiyati (2011). Pendidikan Karakter Dalam Persepektif Teori dan Praktik. Yogyakarta: UNY press
