Analisis Motivasi Belajar Fisika Peserta Didik pada Sekolah Menengah Atas
Abstract
Abstract: This study aimed to analyze the students' motivation to learn physics at high school in Kerinci Regency. Methods This research is a survey research with the type of Cross-Sectional Survey. This study indicates that the average motivation for learning physics for male students is 15.50, with a standard deviation of 3.44. In contrast, female students have an average of 16.7, with a standard deviation of 2.39. In conclusion, the average learning motivation of female students is higher than that of male students, and the learning motivation of male students is significantly different compared to the explanation of female students.
Keywords: Learning Motivation, Students
References
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exerciseof Control. New York: Freeman
Cavallo, A. M. L., Rozman, M., & Potter, W. H. (2004). Gender Differencesin Learning Constructs, Shifts in Learning Constructs,and Their Relationship to Courseachievement in a Structured Inquiry, Yearlong College Physics Course for Life Science Majors. Sch. scince Math, 288, 288–300. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2004.tb18000.x
Kemendikbud. (2019). Laporan Hasil Ujian nasional | kementerian Pendidikan dan kebudayaan,†2019. [Online]. Available: https://hasilun.puspendik.kemdikbud.go.id/#2019!sma!capaian!10&99&999!a&T&T&T&1&unbk!2!&. [Accessed: 19-Aug-2019]
Martzes, J. J., & Leonard, W. (2006). Handbook of College Science Teachin. Arlington: Nation Science Teacher Association
Reeve, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., & Nix, G. (2003). Testing Models of The Experience of Self-Determination in Intrinsic Motivation and the Conundrum of Choice. J. Educ. Psychol, 95, 375–392. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.375
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol, 25(1), 54–67. DOI: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Seymour, E. (1992). The Problem Iceberg’ in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education: Student Explanations for High Attrition Rates. J. Coll. Sci. Teach, 21, 230–238. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ449141
Cavallo, A. M. L., Rozman, M., & Potter, W. H. (2004). Gender Differencesin Learning Constructs, Shifts in Learning Constructs,and Their Relationship to Courseachievement in a Structured Inquiry, Yearlong College Physics Course for Life Science Majors. Sch. scince Math, 288, 288–300. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2004.tb18000.x
Kemendikbud. (2019). Laporan Hasil Ujian nasional | kementerian Pendidikan dan kebudayaan,†2019. [Online]. Available: https://hasilun.puspendik.kemdikbud.go.id/#2019!sma!capaian!10&99&999!a&T&T&T&1&unbk!2!&. [Accessed: 19-Aug-2019]
Martzes, J. J., & Leonard, W. (2006). Handbook of College Science Teachin. Arlington: Nation Science Teacher Association
Reeve, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., & Nix, G. (2003). Testing Models of The Experience of Self-Determination in Intrinsic Motivation and the Conundrum of Choice. J. Educ. Psychol, 95, 375–392. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.375
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol, 25(1), 54–67. DOI: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Seymour, E. (1992). The Problem Iceberg’ in Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education: Student Explanations for High Attrition Rates. J. Coll. Sci. Teach, 21, 230–238. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ449141
Published
2021-12-31
Section
Articles
