Evaluasi Kinerja Program Studi di Pendidikan Tinggi Perspective Balance Score

  • Adisel Adisel IAIN Bengkulu


The purpose of this study was to learn how to evaluate study programs in higher education perspective balance scores. The method used in this study is a mixed method between quantitative and qualitative research methods. Program evaluation and quality assurance must be an important element in efforts to increase support in community rehabilitation programs and community-based rehabilitation organizations. higher education, (2) there is an increase in the performance of higher education, the study program is seen from the perspective of the balanced scorecard. This article is a model evaluation of program reviews in higher education services. In addition, this article shows an analysis of other related journals. This continues (1) the results of evaluating the accreditation process of higher education with 4 balanced perspectives that are seen (a) based on the financial scorecard perspective in a fairly good position (b) the perspective of higher education customers depends on good categories (c) in the innovation process. as customer needs arise, universities are products or services to meet those needs. (d) the existing learning and growth perspective is quite good.

Keywords: Performance Evaluation, Balanced Scorecard


Al-Hosaini dan Sofian, S. (2015). A Review of Balanced Scorecard Framework in Higher Education Institution (HEIs). International Review of Management and Marketing, 5 (1): 26-3

Ashraf .(2011). Measuring the Learning Organization’s Construct in Pakistan: A Case of Public Sector Educational Institutes. European Journal of Social Sciences, 18 (4)

Amin Widjaya. (2002). Tunggal,Manajemen. Jakarta: Penerbit Rineka Cipta.

Averson, Paul. (2012). “A Balanced Scorecard for City & County Services”, http:\\www.balanced scorecard.org.,

Bush, Tony & Coleman, Marianne. (2006). Manajemen Strategis Kepemimpinan Pendidikan (terj.) oleh. Fahrurrozi. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD.

Coulter, Mary&Stephen, Robbins.P. (1999). Management. Sixth Edition. Jakarta: PT. Prehallindo.

Griggs, Blackburn, Smith. (2012). Journal The Educational Scorecard: The Start of our Journey

Hikmat, Angkasa. (2009). Manajeman Pendidikan. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Jalaliyoon dan Taherdoost. (2012). Journal; Performance evaluation of higher education; a necessity

Kaplan, Robert S and Norton, David P. (1996). Balanced Scorecard, Jakarta, Erlangga.

Mulyadi. (2001). Balanced scorecard: alat manajemen kontemporer untuk pelipatganda kinerja keuangan perusahaan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Jalaliyoon dan Taherdoost. (2012). Journal; Performance evaluation of higher education; a necessity

Neuman, W. L. (1997). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches in Social Works. New York: Columbia University.

Richardus Eko Indrajit dan Richardus Djokopranoto. (2004). Manajemen Pendidikan Tinggi Modern, Jakarta.

Siswanto. (2006). Pengantar Menajemen. Jakarta: Penerbit Bumi Aksara.

Taherdoost (2011). Journal Importance of higher education performance evaluation, balance scorecard

Weerasooriya. (2013). Journal Performance Evaluation using the Balanced Scorecard: The case of Sri Lankan Universities
How to Cite
Adisel, A. (2019). Evaluasi Kinerja Program Studi di Pendidikan Tinggi Perspective Balance Score. Journal Of Administration and Educational Management (ALIGNMENT), 2(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31539/alignment.v2i1.613
Abstract viewed = 21 times
pdf downloaded = 26 times