Evaluasi Kinerja Program Studi di Pendidikan Tinggi Perspective Balance Score

  • Adisel Adisel IAIN Bengkulu

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out how to evaluate the performance of study programs in higher education perspective balance score. The method used in this study is a mix of methods between quantitative and qualitative research methods. Program evaluation and quality assurance have become important elements in the efforts to continuously improve public rehabilitation programs and community-based rehabilitation organizations. higher education, (2) whether there is an increase in higher education performance, the study program is seen from the perspective of the balanced scorecard. This article is an evaluation model of program reviews in higher education services. In addition, the article shows the analysis of other related journals. This continues (1) the results of the higher education performance accreditation assessment process with 4 balanced perspectives that are visible (a) based on the perspective of the financial scorecard in a fairly good position (b) the perspective of the higher education customer is in the good category (c) in the innovation process, can seen as an emerging customer need, a university is a product or service to meet those needs. (d) the existing learning and growth perspective is going quite well. In conclusion, the results of accreditation conducted in general can reflect the feasibility and accountability of agencies in the management of higher education.

Keywords: Performance Evaluation, Balanced Scorecard

References

Al-Hosaini, H., & Sofian, S. (2015). A Review of Balanced Scorecard Framework in Higher Education Institution (HEIs). International Review of Management and Marketing, 5(1), 26-3

Ashraf, S. (2011). Measuring the Learning Organization’s Construct in Pakistan: A Case of Public Sector Educational Institutes. European Journal of Social Sciences, 18(4)

Coulter, M., & Stephen, R. P. (1999). Management. Sixth Edition. Jakarta: PT. Prehallindo

Griggs, B. S. (2012). Journal The Educational Scorecard: The Start of our Journey

Hikmat, A. (2009). Manajeman Pendidikan. Bandung: Pustaka Setia

Jalaliyoon, J., & Taherdoost, T. (2012). Journal; Performance evaluation of higher education; a necessity

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Balanced Scorecard. Jakarta: Erlangga

Mulyadi, M. (2001). Balanced Scorecard: Alat Manajemen Kontemporer untuk Pelipatganda Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat

Neuman, W. L. (1997). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches in Social Works. New York: Columbia University

Paul, A. (2012). “A Balanced Scorecard for City & County Services”, http:\\www.balanced scorecard.org

Richardus, E. I., & Richardus, D. (2004). Manajemen Pendidikan Tinggi Modern, Jakarta

Siswanto, S. (2006). Pengantar Menajemen. Jakarta: Penerbit Bumi Aksara

Taherdoost, T. (2011). Journal Importance of higher education performance evaluation, balance scorecard

Tony, B &., Marianne, C. (2006). Manajemen Strategis Kepemimpinan Pendidikan (terj.) oleh. Fahrurrozi. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD

Weerasooriya, W. (2013). Journal Performance Evaluation using the Balanced Scorecard: The case of Sri Lankan Universities

Widjaya, A. (2002). Tunggal,Manajemen. Jakarta: Penerbit Rineka Cipta
Published
2019-06-30
How to Cite
Adisel, A. (2019). Evaluasi Kinerja Program Studi di Pendidikan Tinggi Perspective Balance Score. Alignment:Journal of Administration and Educational Management, 2(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31539/alignment.v2i1.613
Abstract viewed = 96 times
pdf downloaded = 63 times