THE EVALUATION OF REMOTE WORKING USING CIPP INDICATORS, A STUDY AT PT KARYA KAYA BAHAGIA (harisenin.com)

  • Prasetio Febiantono Saputra Universitas Widyatama
  • Deden Sutisna Universitas Widyatama
Keywords: Remote Working, CIPP Evaluation, Context, Input, Process, Product

Abstract

In this digital era, remote working systems have been adopted by many companies due to their flexibility and efficiency, despite some implementation shortcomings. This study aims to evaluate the remote working system at PT Karya Kaya Bahagia (harisenin.com) using the CIPP (context, input, process, product) evaluation model. Based on its objectives, this research is descriptive-evaluative with a qualitative approach. Descriptive-evaluative research provides in-depth insights into a phenomenon or program and assesses its effectiveness and impact. The approach is based on post-positivist philosophy, conducted in a natural setting with the researcher as the key instrument, using qualitative data collection techniques (observation, interviews, and documentation), and data analysis with the interactive model by Miles and Huberman. The remote working system at PT Karya Kaya Bahagia offers flexibility, reduces operational costs, and enhances employee satisfaction. However, challenges in coordination, communication, and technical issues such as unstable internet connections hinder work effectiveness. The CIPP evaluation reveals that while this system is effective in saving costs and providing flexibility, problems like suboptimal SOP implementation, weak supervision, and communication issues need resolution. Technical difficulties and inefficient time management also reduce productivity, and performance assessments based on OKR have not yet met expectations. To boost effectiveness and employee well-being, improvements are needed in transparency, communication, work methods, and compensation.

References

1. Adekoya, O. D., Adisa, T. A., dan Aiyenitaju, O. Going forward: Remote working in the post-COVID-19 era. Employee Relations, 44(6), 1410-1427 (2016)
2. Adih Supriadi, A. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Cet. 1). Sukoharjo: Tahta Media Group (2022)
3. De Vincenzi, C., Pansini, M., Ferrara, B., Buonomo, I., dan Benevene, P. Consequences of COVID-19 on employees in remote working: Challenges, risks, and opportunities - An evidence-based literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(18), 11672 (2022)
4. Ferrara, B., Pansini, M., De Vincenzi, C., Buonomo, I., dan Benevene, P. Investigating the role of remote working on employees’ performance and well-being: An evidence-based systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 12373 (2022)
5. Kazi, C., dan Hastwell, C. Remote work productivity study finds surprising reality: 2-year analysis. Great Place to Work (2021)
6. Krisnawuri Handayani. Implementasi manajemen modern pada organisasi. JEMBA: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 3(2), 119-126 (2024)
7. Mendo, A., Niode, I., dan Kango, U. Pengantar manajemen dan bisnis. Edited by Raflin Hinelo. NTB: Yayasan Hamjah Diha (2022)
8. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., dan Saldaña, J. Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc (2014)
9. Morrison-Smith, S., dan Ruiz, J. Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: A literature review. SN Applied Sciences, 2, 1096 (2020)
10. Muryadi, A. D. Model evaluasi program dalam penelitian evaluasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Penjas (Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pengajaran), 3(1) (2017)
11. Ng, P. M. L., Lit, K. K., dan Ng, P. M. L., C. T. Y. Remote work as a new normal? The technology-organization-environment (TOE) context. Technology in Society, 70, 102022 (2022)
12. Rafida, T., Ananda, R., dan Rusydi. Pengantar evaluasi program pendidikan (Cet. 1). Medan: Perdana Publishing (2017)
13. Sadikin, A., Misra, I., dan Hudin, M. S. Pengantar manajemen dan bisnis. Yogyakarta: K-Media (2020)
14. Stufflebeam, D. L., dan Coryn, C. L. S. Evaluation theory, models, and applications (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass/Wiley (2014)
15. Stufflebeam, D. L., dan Shinkfield, A. J. Evaluation theory, models, and applications. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons (2007)
16. Stufflebeam, D. L., dan Zhang, G. The CIPP evaluation model. The Guildford Press (2017)
17. Sugiyono. Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: ALFABETA (2013)
18. Urbaniec, M., Małkowska, A., dan Włodarkiewicz-Klimek, H. The impact of technological developments on remote working: Insights from the Polish managers’ perspective. Sustainability, 14(1), 552 (2022)
19. Vafin, A. The impact of remote work on firm’s profitability: Optimizing virtual employee productivity and operational costs. ResearchBerg Review of Science and Technology, 1(1), 50–68 (2021)
20. Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., dan Parker, S. K. Achieving effective remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 16-59 (2020)
21. Widiana, M. E. Buku ajar pengantar manajemen. Banyumas: Pena Persada (2020)
Published
2024-10-02
Abstract viewed = 0 times
pdf downloaded = 2 times