BEHAVIORAL FINANCE AND ITS IMPACT ON CORPORATE FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING
Abstract
Behavioral finance has become an important field of study that bridges psychology and financial decision-making. This article examines the impact of behavioral finance on corporate financial decision-making through a literature review of studies published since 2020. Key behavioral biases—such as overconfidence, loss aversion, and herd behavior—are analyzed for their influence on corporate strategies, including investment decisions, risk management, and capital budgeting. The findings reveal that these biases often lead to suboptimal financial outcomes, such as overly aggressive or overly conservative investment decisions, as well as an inability to manage risks effectively. This underscores the importance of integrating behavioral insights into corporate governance to mitigate the negative effects of these biases. Practical recommendations are provided, such as improving financial literacy, managerial training, and implementing structured decision-making processes. This study contributes to the growing body of literature by synthesizing recent research and offering actionable insights to enhance corporate performance. By understanding and addressing behavioral biases, organizations can make more rational and effective financial decisions in the face of complex economic challenges
References
Ahadzie, R. M., Owusu Junior, P., & Woode, J. K. (2025). The Impact of Sentiment on Realized Higher-Order Moments in the S&P 500: Evidence from the Fear and Greed Index. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18010002
Andraszewicz, S., Wu, K., & Sornette, D. (2020). Behavioural Effects and Market Dynamics in Field and Laboratory Experimental Asset Markets. Entropy, 22(10), 1183. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22101183
Artene, A. E., Domil, A. E., & Ivascu, L. (2024). Unlocking Business Value: Integrating AI-Driven Decision-Making in Financial Reporting Systems. Electronics, 13(15), 3069. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13153069
Atiku, S. O., Itembu-Naunyango, K. A., & Oladejo, O. M. (2024). Inclusive Leadership and Employee Engagement as Critical Drivers of Sustainability in Telecommunication Companies. Administrative Sciences, 14(6), 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14060126
Bai, G., Yang, Q., & Elyasiani, E. (2022). Managerial Risk-Taking Incentives and Bank Earnings Management: Evidence from FAS 123R. Sustainability, 14(21), 13721. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113721
Benayad, K., & Aasri, M. R. (2023). Behavioral Biases and Investment Decisions of SMEs Managers: Empirical Analysis within the Moroccan Context. International Journal of Financial Studies, 11(4), 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs11040120
Camacho, L. J., Litheko, A., Pasco, M., Butac, S. R., Ramírez-Correa, P., Salazar-Concha, C., & Magnait, C. P. T. (2024). Examining the Role of Organizational Culture on Citizenship Behavior: The Mediating Effects of Environmental Knowledge and Attitude Toward Energy Savings. Administrative Sciences, 14(9), 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14090193
Cho, S.-w., & Jung, J.-y. (2024). Behavioral Finance Insights into Land Management: Decision Aggregation and Real Estate Market Dynamics in China. Land, 13(9), 1478. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13091478
Ikram, B., Fouad, B. E. H., & Sara, C. (2023). An Exploration of Overconfidence and the Disposition Effect in the Stock Market. International Journal of Financial Studies, 11(2), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs11020078
Kuramoto, Y., Khan, M. S. R., & Kadoya, Y. (2024). Behavioral Biases in Panic Selling: Exploring the Role of Framing during the COVID-19 Market Crisis. Risks, 12(10), 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks12100162
Lamm, K. W., Idun, A., & Lu, P. (2024). Critical Issues Faced by Industries Associated with Food Science and Technology: A Delphi Analysis. Foods, 13(24), 4149. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13244149
Luca, F.-A., Tiganas, C.-G., Grigoras-Ichim, C.-E., Filipeanu, D., & Morosan-Danila, L. (2024). Critical Perspectives of Organisational Behaviour towards Stakeholders through the Application of Corporate Governance Principles. Administrative Sciences, 14(5), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14050084
Milhazes-Cunha, J., & Oliveira, L. (2023). Doctors for the Truth: Echo Chambers of Disinformation, Hate Speech, and Authority Bias on Social Media. Societies, 13(10), 226. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc13100226
Morales-Huamán, H. I., Medina-Valderrama, C. J., Valencia-Arias, A., Vasquez-Coronado, M. H., Valencia, J., & Delgado-Caramutti, J. (2023). Organizational Culture and Teamwork: A Bibliometric Perspective on Public and Private Organizations. Sustainability, 15(18), 13966. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813966
Rodrigues, N. J. P., & Matos, C. I. V. (2024). The Relationship Between Managers’ Emotional Intelligence and Project Management Decisions. Administrative Sciences, 14(12), 318. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14120318
Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J.-M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., Feybesse, C., Sundquist, D., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, Critical Thinking, Communication, and Collaboration: Assessment, Certification, and Promotion of 21st Century Skills for the Future of Work and Education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
Copyright (c) 2025 Alfiana Alfiana, Muhammad Azizi, Andi Primafira Bumandava Eka, I Kadek Wira Dharma Prayana, Srifatmawati Ahmad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
