Pengaruh Penggunaan E-Learning pada Mahasiswa
Abstract
E-learning has been widely used in educational settings especially in developing countries such as Indonesia. The purpose of this study was to investigate e-learning readiness among students and compare students' perceptions of student workloads including mental, physical, temporal, performance, effort, and frustration conditions. in the settings of e-learning and regular lectures.Quantitative methods were used in this study. Using survey techniques with data instruments in the form of questionnaires from 51 data samples. The survey was conducted with students of the Faculty of Arts and Humanities of Hamzanwadi University. Data analysis techniques using NASA-TLX applications. The results showed that students have a high level of e-learning readiness. Mental workloads are significantly higher in e-learning than in face-to-face learning. The correlation between e-learning readiness and mental workload is insignificant. The conclusion of this research is the high readiness of e-learning students because most already have technical skills while the lowest readiness in learning behavior when using e-learning. Student workloads including mental, physical, temporal, performance, effort, and frustration are higher at the time of e-learning use than regular lectures.
Keywords: e-learning; workload; Performance
References
Abi Yodha, S., Abidin, Z., & Adi, E. P. (2019). Persepsi Mahasiswa Terhadap Pelaksanaan E-learning Dalam Mata Kuliah Manajemen Sistem Informasi Mahasiswa Jurusan Teknologi Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Malang. Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 2(3), 181–187.
Al-alak, B. A., & Alnawas, I. A. M. (2011). Measuring the acceptance and adoption of e-learning by academic staff. Knowledge Management & E-learning: An International Journal, 3(2), 201–221.
Alhabeeb, A., & Rowley, J. (2018). E-learning critical success factors: Comparing perspectives from academic staff and students. Computers & Education, 127, 1–12.
Aurora, A., & Effendi, H. (2019). Pengaruh Penggunaan Media Pembelajaran E-learning terhadap Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa di Universitas Negeri Padang. JTEV (Jurnal Teknik Elektro Dan Vokasional), 5(2), 11–16.
Babić, S. (2012). Factors that influence academic teacher’s acceptance of e-learning technology in blended learning environment. E-learning-Organizational Infrastructure and Tools for Specific Areas, 3–18.
Bates, A. W., & Bates, T. (2005). Technology, e-learning and distance education. Psychology Press.
Bovermann, K., Weidlich, J., & Bastiaens, T. (2018). Online learning readiness and attitudes towards gaming in gamified online learning–a mixed methods case study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–17.
Fahrurrozi, M., & Majid, M. A. (2017). Pengembanggan model pembelajaran blended learning berbasis edmodo dalam membentuk kemandirian belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran ekonomi kelas XI IPS SMAN 1 Selong tahun pelajaran 2017/2018. JPEK (Jurnal Pendidik. Ekon. Dan Kewirausahaan), 1(1), 57.
Farida, I., Tjakraatmadja, J. H., Firman, A., & Basuki, S. (2015). A conceptual model of Open Access Institutional Repository in Indonesia academic libraries. Library Management.
Gao, J., Liu, S., Feng, Q., Zhang, X., Zhang, J., Jiang, M., … Zhang, Q. (2018). Quantitative evaluations of the effects of noise on mental workloads based on pupil dilation during laparoscopic surgery. The American Surgeon, 84(12), 1951–1956.
Graham, C. R. (2009). Blended learning models. In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Second Edition (pp. 375–382). IGI Global.
Graham, C. R., Henrie, C. R., & Gibbons, A. S. (2013). Developing models and theory for blended learning research. Blended Learning: Research Perspectives, 2, 13–33.
Hadisi, L., & Muna, W. (2015). Pengelolaan teknologi informasi dalam menciptakan model inovasi pembelajaran (e-learning). Al-TA’DIB: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kependidikan, 8(1), 117–140.
Hove, M. C., & Corcoran, K. J. (2008a). Educational technologies: Impact on learning and frustration. Teaching of Psychology, 35(2), 121–125.
Hove, M. C., & Corcoran, K. J. (2008b). If you post it, will they come? Lecture availability in introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 35(2), 91–95.
Karwati, E. (2014). Pengaruh Pembelajaran elektronik (e-learning) terhadap mutu belajar mahasiswa. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi, 17(1), 41–54.
Kusmana, A. (2017). E-learning dalam Pembelajaran. Lentera Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan, 14(1), 35–51.
Moule, P., Ward, R., & Lockyer, L. (2011). Issues with e-learning in nursing and health education in the UK: are new technologies being embraced in the teaching and learning environments? Journal of Research in Nursing, 16(1), 77–90.
Nurhayati, N., Purnomo, M. E., & Subadiyono, S. (2018). Pengaruh Online Peer Editing Berbasis E-learning Terhadap Kemampuan Menulis Naskah Drama Dulmuluk. publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id.
Ozkan, A., Ozdevecioglu, M., Kaya, Y., & Koç, F. Ö. (2015). Effects of mental workloads on depression–anger symptoms and interpersonal sensitivities of accounting professionals. Revista de Contabilidad, 18(2), 194–199.
Saifuddin, M. F. (2018). E-learning dalam persepsi mahasiswa. Jurnal Varidika, 29(2), 102–109.
Shurygin, V. Y., & Sabirova, F. M. (2017). Particularities of blended learning implementation in teaching physics by means of LMS Moodle. Revista Espacios, 38(40).
Sife, A., Lwoga, E., & Sanga, C. (2007). New technologies for teaching and learning: Challenges for higher learning institutions in developing countries. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 3(2), 57–67.
Sørebø, Ø., Halvari, H., Gulli, V. F., & Kristiansen, R. (2009). The role of self-determination theory in explaining teachers’ motivation to continue to use e-learning technology. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1177–1187.
Sulistyo-Basuki, L. (2007). IT and education, the case study of e-learning in Indonesia.
Suwastika, I. W. K. (2018). Pengaruh e-learning sebagai salah satu media pembelajaran berbasis teknologi informasi terhadap motivasi belajar mahasiswa. Jurnal Sistem Dan Informatika (JSI), 13(1), 1–5.
Uska, M. Z., Wirasasmita, R. H., & Fahrurrozi, M. (2020). The application of Usability Testing Method for Evaluating the New Student Acceptance (NSA) System. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1539(1), 12028. IOP Publishing.
Valiathan, P. (2002). Blended learning models. Learning Circuits, 3(8), 50–59.
Wu, W., Tsai, C., & Fu, C. (2013). The relationships among internal marketing, job satisfaction, relationship marketing, customer orientation, and organizational performance: An empirical study of TFTâ€LCD companies in Taiwan. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 23(5), 436–449.
Zhang, J., Nassef, A., Mahfouf, M., Linkens, D. A., El-Samahy, E., Hockey, G. R. J., … Roberts, A. C. (2006). Modelling and analysis of HRV under physical and mental workloads. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 39(18), 189–194.
Al-alak, B. A., & Alnawas, I. A. M. (2011). Measuring the acceptance and adoption of e-learning by academic staff. Knowledge Management & E-learning: An International Journal, 3(2), 201–221.
Alhabeeb, A., & Rowley, J. (2018). E-learning critical success factors: Comparing perspectives from academic staff and students. Computers & Education, 127, 1–12.
Aurora, A., & Effendi, H. (2019). Pengaruh Penggunaan Media Pembelajaran E-learning terhadap Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa di Universitas Negeri Padang. JTEV (Jurnal Teknik Elektro Dan Vokasional), 5(2), 11–16.
Babić, S. (2012). Factors that influence academic teacher’s acceptance of e-learning technology in blended learning environment. E-learning-Organizational Infrastructure and Tools for Specific Areas, 3–18.
Bates, A. W., & Bates, T. (2005). Technology, e-learning and distance education. Psychology Press.
Bovermann, K., Weidlich, J., & Bastiaens, T. (2018). Online learning readiness and attitudes towards gaming in gamified online learning–a mixed methods case study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–17.
Fahrurrozi, M., & Majid, M. A. (2017). Pengembanggan model pembelajaran blended learning berbasis edmodo dalam membentuk kemandirian belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran ekonomi kelas XI IPS SMAN 1 Selong tahun pelajaran 2017/2018. JPEK (Jurnal Pendidik. Ekon. Dan Kewirausahaan), 1(1), 57.
Farida, I., Tjakraatmadja, J. H., Firman, A., & Basuki, S. (2015). A conceptual model of Open Access Institutional Repository in Indonesia academic libraries. Library Management.
Gao, J., Liu, S., Feng, Q., Zhang, X., Zhang, J., Jiang, M., … Zhang, Q. (2018). Quantitative evaluations of the effects of noise on mental workloads based on pupil dilation during laparoscopic surgery. The American Surgeon, 84(12), 1951–1956.
Graham, C. R. (2009). Blended learning models. In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Second Edition (pp. 375–382). IGI Global.
Graham, C. R., Henrie, C. R., & Gibbons, A. S. (2013). Developing models and theory for blended learning research. Blended Learning: Research Perspectives, 2, 13–33.
Hadisi, L., & Muna, W. (2015). Pengelolaan teknologi informasi dalam menciptakan model inovasi pembelajaran (e-learning). Al-TA’DIB: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kependidikan, 8(1), 117–140.
Hove, M. C., & Corcoran, K. J. (2008a). Educational technologies: Impact on learning and frustration. Teaching of Psychology, 35(2), 121–125.
Hove, M. C., & Corcoran, K. J. (2008b). If you post it, will they come? Lecture availability in introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 35(2), 91–95.
Karwati, E. (2014). Pengaruh Pembelajaran elektronik (e-learning) terhadap mutu belajar mahasiswa. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi, 17(1), 41–54.
Kusmana, A. (2017). E-learning dalam Pembelajaran. Lentera Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan, 14(1), 35–51.
Moule, P., Ward, R., & Lockyer, L. (2011). Issues with e-learning in nursing and health education in the UK: are new technologies being embraced in the teaching and learning environments? Journal of Research in Nursing, 16(1), 77–90.
Nurhayati, N., Purnomo, M. E., & Subadiyono, S. (2018). Pengaruh Online Peer Editing Berbasis E-learning Terhadap Kemampuan Menulis Naskah Drama Dulmuluk. publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id.
Ozkan, A., Ozdevecioglu, M., Kaya, Y., & Koç, F. Ö. (2015). Effects of mental workloads on depression–anger symptoms and interpersonal sensitivities of accounting professionals. Revista de Contabilidad, 18(2), 194–199.
Saifuddin, M. F. (2018). E-learning dalam persepsi mahasiswa. Jurnal Varidika, 29(2), 102–109.
Shurygin, V. Y., & Sabirova, F. M. (2017). Particularities of blended learning implementation in teaching physics by means of LMS Moodle. Revista Espacios, 38(40).
Sife, A., Lwoga, E., & Sanga, C. (2007). New technologies for teaching and learning: Challenges for higher learning institutions in developing countries. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 3(2), 57–67.
Sørebø, Ø., Halvari, H., Gulli, V. F., & Kristiansen, R. (2009). The role of self-determination theory in explaining teachers’ motivation to continue to use e-learning technology. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1177–1187.
Sulistyo-Basuki, L. (2007). IT and education, the case study of e-learning in Indonesia.
Suwastika, I. W. K. (2018). Pengaruh e-learning sebagai salah satu media pembelajaran berbasis teknologi informasi terhadap motivasi belajar mahasiswa. Jurnal Sistem Dan Informatika (JSI), 13(1), 1–5.
Uska, M. Z., Wirasasmita, R. H., & Fahrurrozi, M. (2020). The application of Usability Testing Method for Evaluating the New Student Acceptance (NSA) System. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1539(1), 12028. IOP Publishing.
Valiathan, P. (2002). Blended learning models. Learning Circuits, 3(8), 50–59.
Wu, W., Tsai, C., & Fu, C. (2013). The relationships among internal marketing, job satisfaction, relationship marketing, customer orientation, and organizational performance: An empirical study of TFTâ€LCD companies in Taiwan. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 23(5), 436–449.
Zhang, J., Nassef, A., Mahfouf, M., Linkens, D. A., El-Samahy, E., Hockey, G. R. J., … Roberts, A. C. (2006). Modelling and analysis of HRV under physical and mental workloads. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 39(18), 189–194.
Published
2021-06-30
Section
Articles
