Pengaruh Model Inkuiri Terbimbing dan Keterampilan Proses Sains terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran IPA

  • Amat Amat SDN 03 Montong Betok, Universitas Hamzanwadi
  • Hartini Haritani Universitas Hamzanwadi
  • M. Khairul Wazni Universitas Hamzanwadi

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether the influence of guided inquiry learning models and pro-science skills on the cognitive learning outcomes of grade V science students. This type of research is Quasi-Experimental research  with a research design using T treatment by Level 2x2. The population in this study were grade V students of elementary school. This research instrument is a multiple-choice test with a total of 20 questions. Data processing techniques and data analysis are descriptive statistics and infrencial statistics with SPSS 22. The data analysis results show significant differences in student cognitive learning outcomes with guided inquiry methods and science process skills, namely sig. = 0.000 < 0.05, meaning that there are differences in learning outcomes taught by guided inquiry (experimental class) with student learning outcomes taught by conventional approaches (control classes). Furthermore, there is an interaction caused between the use of guided inquiry methods by looking at the level of skills of the student's science process towards the cognitive learning outcomes. This can also be proven from the hypothesis test results, namely with a value of sig. = 0.000 < 0.05 means that there is a significant interaction between the use of guided inquiry and the skill level of the student's science process to influence the cognitive learning outcomes of students together. The conclusion of this study is that there is no significant interaction between science process skills and learning outcomes. The cognitive learning outcomes of students who were taught using the guided inquiry learning model were higher than those taught using the conventional learning model for students with low science process skills.

 

Keywords: Guided Inquiry, Learning Outcomes, Process Skills

References

Abdiyah, L., & Subiyantoro, S. (2021). Penerapan Teori Konstruktivistik Dalam Pembelajaran Tematik Di Sekolah Dasar. ELSE (Elementary School Education Journal) : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar, 5(2).

Ainin, M. (2017). Implementasi Pendekatan Saintifik di Era Kurikulum 13 dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab: Relevankah? Konferensi Nasional Bahasa Arab III.

Aisyah, S., & Astuti, R. (2021). Analisis Mengenai Telaah Kurikulum K-13 pada Jenjang Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i6.1770

Anshori, M., & Iswati, S. (2019). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif: edisi 1. Airlangga University Press.

Balanay, C. A. S. (2013). Assessment on students’ science process skills: A student-centred approach. International Journal of Biology Education, 3(1a), 24–44. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i10.11625

Baur, A., & Emden, M. (2021). How to open inquiry teaching? An alternative teaching scaffold to foster students’ inquiry skills. Chemistry Teacher International, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2019-0013

Darmadi, H. (2016). Tugas, peran, kompetensi, dan tanggung jawab menjadi guru profesional. Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(2), 161–174.

Dwi Apriliani, N. M. P., Wibawa, I. M. C., & Rati, N. W. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.23887/jppp.v3i2.17390

Fahrurrozi, M., Haritani, H., Zainul Majdi, M., Murcahyanto, H., Nasution, M. H., & Sururuddin, M. (2021). Human-Resource Management Education: it Challenges and Alternatives for Teacher Economics Quality Development. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(9).

Fahrurrozi, M., Mohzana, M., & Murcahyanto, H. (2021a). Kemampuan Guru Dalam Menilai Aspek Afektif. JOEAI, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.31539/joeai.v4i1.2150

Fahrurrozi, M., Mohzana, M., Murcahyanto, H., & Basri, H. (2022). Trainers’ Performance in Entrepreneurship Class: Evidence from Lesson Planning of Non-Formal School in Lombok Timur. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i2.2022

Fahrurrozi, M., Mohzana, & Murcahyanto, H. (2021b). Strategi Pembelajaran dan Kemampuan Guru Kelas. JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction), 4(1). https://doi.org/10.31539/joeai.v4i1.2146

Haritani, H., Febriani, Y., Rafsanjani, A., & Azim, M. (2021). An Analysis of Student’s Critical Thinking to Improve the Higher-Order Thinking Skill of Undergraduate Pharmacy Students. 2nd Progress in Social Science, Humanities and Education Research Symposium (PSSHERS 2020), 167–172.

Haslina, Y., & Usman, N. (2017). Kinerja guru dalam implementasi kurikulum 2013 pada SMA Negeri 5 Lhokseumawe. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan: Program Pascasarjana Unsyiah, 5(4).

Hasna Prilia, A., Irianto, S., & Sriyanto, S. (2021). Bahan Ajar Tematik Berbasis Kompetensi Peserta Didik di Abad 21. Jurnal Ilmiah Kontekstual, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.46772/kontekstual.v2i02.399

Ibrahim, A., Aulls, M. W., & Shore, B. M. (2016). Development, validation, and factorial comparison of the McGill Self-Efficacy of Learners For Inquiry Engagement (McSELFIE) survey in natural science disciplines. International Journal of Science Education, 38(16). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1249531

Indonesia, R. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 tentang. Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah.

Juniati, N. W., & Widiana, I. W. (2017). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v1i1.10126

Katawazai, R. (2021). Implementing outcome-based education and student-centered learning in Afghan public universities: the current practices and challenges. Heliyon, 7(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07076

Liwa Ilhamdi, M., Novita, D., & Nur Kholifatur Rosyidah, A. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis IPA SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Kontekstual, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.46772/kontekstual.v1i02.162

Meo, L., Weu, G., & BS, Y. N. (2021). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA Pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Citra Bakti, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.38048/jipcb.v8i1.101

Mohzana, Fahrurrozi, M., Haritani, H., Majdi, M. Z., & Murcahyanto, H. (2020). A management model for character education in higher education. Talent Development and Excellence, 12(SpecialIssue3).

Morel, G. M. (2021). Student-centered learning: context needed. In Educational Technology Research and Development (Vol. 69, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09951-0

Muamar, M. R., & Rahmi, R. (2017). Analisis keterampilan proses sains dan keterampilan kognitif siswa melalui metode praktikum biologi pada sub materi schizophyta dan thallophyta. Jurnal Pendidikan Almuslim, 5(1). http://www.jfkip.umuslim.ac.id/index.php/jupa/article/view/204

Nasri, M., Marhamah, M., & Haritani, H. (2021). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (IPA) Berbasis Problem Based Learning (PBL). Bioscientist: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, 9(2), 297–317.

Nirwana, F. B., & Maharta, N. (2014). Pengaruh keterampilan proses sains terhadap hasil belajar pada model latihan inkuiri. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 2(3).

Nugrahaeni, A., Redhana, I. W., & Kartawan, I. M. A. (2017). Penerapan model pembelajaran discovery learning untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan hasil belajar kimia. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 1(1), 23–29.

Nurdyansyah, N. (2019). Media Pembelajaran Inovatif. In Media Pembelajaran Inovatif. https://doi.org/10.21070/2019/978-602-5914-71-3

Nurhabibah, S., Hidayat, A., & Mudiono, A. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Hasil Belajar Muatan IPA di Kelas IV. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 3(10), 1286–1293.

RI, K. P. N. (2019). Undang-Undang RI No. 14 Tahun 2005 Tentang Guru dan Dosen.

Ruzaman, N. K., & Rosli, D. I. (2020). Inquiry-based education: Innovation in participatory inquiry paradigm. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(10). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i10.11460

Safitri, I., & Nurul Fadillah. (2021). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Tematik Berbasis Sains Teknologi Masyarakat (STM) Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Siswa Di SDN 1 Alue Dua. Jurnal Tunas Bangsa, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.46244/tunasbangsa.v8i1.1238

Sugiyono, S. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta Bandung.

Suharto, S. (2007). Pengembangan materi dan kegiatan pembelajarannya dalam kurikulum tingkat satuan pendidikan bidang seni musik. Harmonia: Journal Of Arts Research And Education, 8(3).

Sukisno, T. (2020). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu. UNY, 1(Pembelajaran Tematik).

Suliyanto, S. E., & MM, S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif.

Suparman, T., Prawiyogi, A. G., & Susanti, R. E. (2020). Pengaruh Media Gambar Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i2.332

Wafiqni ; Nurani. (2018). Model Pembelajaran Tematik. Al Bidayah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islamah, 10(2).

Wazni, M. K., & Fatmawati, B. (2022). Study of science process skills student using worksheet based on science process skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(2), 436–443.

Wisudawati, A. W., & Sulistyowati, E. (2022). Metodologi pembelajaran IPA. Bumi Aksara.

Yanti, R., Prihatin, T., & Khumaedi, K. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Ditinjau Dari Kebiasaan Membaca, Motivasi Belajar dan Prestasi Belajar. INKUIRI: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.20961/inkuiri.v9i2.27422

Yasmin, F. L., Santoso, A., & Utaya, S. (2016). Hubungan disiplin dengan tanggung jawab belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 1(4), 692–697.
Published
2022-11-20
How to Cite
Amat, A., Haritani, H., & Wazni, M. K. (2022). Pengaruh Model Inkuiri Terbimbing dan Keterampilan Proses Sains terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran IPA. JOEAI (Journal of Education and Instruction), 5(2), 456-466. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31539/joeai.v5i2.4397
Abstract viewed = 0 times
pdf downloaded = 0 times