Pematuhan dan Penyimpangan Prinsip Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Wacana Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia

  • Nur Nisai Muslihah STKIP PGRI LUBUKLINGGAU
  • Riko Febrianto STKIP PGRI Lubuklinggau

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe the form of compliance and deviation of the principle of language politeness as well as the level of language politeness in the textbooks were focused on Bahasa Indonesia textbook of SMA, MA, SMK, MAK Class 10 Curriculum 2013 Revised Edition 2016 by Suherli etc. The method used in this study was quantitative descriptive method by using reading and recording as data collecting technique. Data analysis was done by using matching method. The determination of the form of complience and deviation of the principles of language politeness refered to the theories of politeness and Leechs politeness principles. While the the level of politeness was calculated based on the tendency compliance and deviations on the principle of language politeness. The results showed that there were 211 speech either obey or deviate to the principle of politeness. The obedience amounted to 157 speech, consisting of 63 maxims of wisdom, 6 generosity maxims, 18 reward maxims, and 70 maxim of consensus. The deviation of the principle of language politeness had a lower proportion of 54 speech, consisting of 52 maxims of wisdom, and 2 maxims of appreciation. Level of discourse politics contained in textbooks Indonesian SMA, MA, SMK, MAK Class 10 Curriculum 2013 revised edition 2016. It can be seen from the compliance rate having 74.4 percent, percentage which is in the range of 61percent to 80 percent with the polite category, and the deviation has the percentage of 25.6 percent which is in the range of 21 percent to 40 percent with the polite category.

Keywords: Compliance, Deviation, Modesty, Discourse, Textbook.

References

Chaer, Abdul. (2010). Kesantunan Berbahasa. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Leech, Geoffrey. (2015). Prinsip-Prinsip Pragmatik (Edisi 2015, Oka M.D.D., Terjemahan). Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.

Mulyana. (2005). Kajian Wacana. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Muslich, Masnur. (2006). Kesantunan Berbahasa: Sebuah Kajian Sosiolinguistik. (Online). https://id.scribd.com/document/48235235/kesantunan-berbahasa (Diakses tanggal 21 Februari 2017).

Pranowo. (2012). Berbahasa Secara Santun. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

-----------. 2014. Teori Belajar Bahasa: untuk Guru Bahasa dan Mahasiswa Jurusan Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Rahardi, Kunjana. (2005). Pragmatik: Kesantunan Imperatif Bahasa Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Erlangga.

Sobur, Alex. (2012). Analisis Teks Media (Suatu Pengantar untuk Analisis Wacana, Analisis Semiotik, dan Analisis Framing). Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sosiowati, I Gusti Ayu Gde. (2013). Kesantunan Bahasa Politisi dalam Talk Show di Metro TV. (Disertasi Doktoral, Universitas Udayana, 2013). (Online) http://www.pps.unud.ac.id/disertasi/detail-66-kesantunan-bahasa-politisi--dalam-talk-show-di-metro-tv.html (Diakses tanggal 18 April 2017).

Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Tarigan, Henry Guntur dan Djago Tarigan. (2009). Telaah Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia. Bandung: Angkasa.

Zamzani, (2011). Pengembangan Alat Ukur Kesantunan Bahasa Indonesia dalam Interaksi Sosial Bersemuka. Jurnal Litera UNY, Vol. 10, No. 1, April 2011, 35-50. (http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/litera/article/view/1171) (Diakses tanggal 10 Februari 2017).
Published
2017-12-31
How to Cite
Muslihah, N., & Febrianto, R. (2017). Pematuhan dan Penyimpangan Prinsip Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Wacana Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal KIBASP (Kajian Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pengajaran), 1(1), 99-118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31539/kibasp.v1i1.92
Abstract viewed = 147 times
pdf downloaded = 298 times