Miskonsepsi Materi Genetika tentang Ekspresi Gen
Abstract
This study aims to identify and see cases of genetic material misconceptions in class XII IPA SMA Negeri 09 Bengkulu City. This research is a descriptive study, the population in this study were all students of class XII Science SMA Negeri 09 Bengkulu City, totaling seven classes. The sampling technique was done by cluster sample and two classes were selected, namely class XII Natural Sciences 2 and class XII Natural Sciences 7. The total sample used was 91 students. Data collection techniques in this study were two-dimensional diagnostic test instruments consisting of 40 multiple choice questions with a level of confidence (CRI). The results showed there were students' misconceptions of Genetic material by 35.01%. Of the eight learning indicators there are three indicators with a high number of misconceptions, namely indicator 8 (describing the process of protein synthesis, 33.46%), indicator 5 (describing the structure of RNA, 36.84%), and indicator 2 (describing the relationship of cells, chromosomes , genes, with DNA, 37.45%). Based on the cognitive level of the test, students experienced the most misconceptions at C5 (evaluation, 41.94%). Conclusion, Misconceptions experienced by students in learning genetic material about gene expression are in 3 indicators which are the highest of 8 indicators, causes of misconception due to lack of reference sources or information, the concept of genetic substance concept that is abstract, many foreign terms, difficult language, and the unpreparedness of students in accepting material delivered by the teacher.
Keywords: Gene Expression, Genetic Material, Misconception
References
Andrews MT, Price RM, Mead LS. McElhinny TL. Thanukos A. Perez KE. Herreid CF. Terry DR & Lemons PP. (2012). Biology Undergraduates’ Misconceptions about Genetic Drift, Journal of CBE-Life Sciences Education, 11 (3): 248–259. [diakses 27 November 2019 03.25 am]. Tersedia pada www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/
Gultom, D. L. S. (2019). Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Klasifikasi Makhluk Hidup di Kelas VII MTS. Swasta Al-Washliyah Sigambal Tahun Pembelajaran 2018/2019. Jurnal Berkala Mahasiswa, 1(2), 39-42.
Kaur G. (2013). A Review of Selected Literature on Causative Agents and Identification Strategies of Students’ Misconceptions. Journal of Educationia Confab. 2(11): 79-94. [diakses 26 Oktober 2019 09.03 am] Tersedia dalam confabjournals.com/
Keles, E & Kefeli, K. (2010). Determination of Student Misconceptions In “Photosynthesis and Respiration†Unit and Correcting Them with The Help of CAI Material, Journal of Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2: 3111-3118. [diakses 16 Januari 2015 03.00 am]. Tersedia dalam www.sciencedirect.com/
Klug, W. S., Cummngs, M. R., Spencer, C. A. & Palladino, M. A. (2012). Concept of Genetics (Tenth Edition). US: Pearson Education, Inc.
Munzenmaier & Rubin. (2013). Perspectives Bloom’s Taxonomy: What’s Old Is New Again. Santa Rosa: The Elearning Guild
Nusantari, E. (2011). Analisis dan Penyebab Miskonsepsi pada Materi Genetika Buku SMA Kelas XII. Bioedukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 4(2), 72-85.
Sarhim, F. P., & Harahap, F. (2015). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi Genetika Di Kelas XII IPA SMA Negeri 13 Medan Tahun Pembelajaran 2014/2015. Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan, 3(4).
Snustad, D. P. & Simmons, M. J. (2012). Principles of Genetics (Sixth Edition). United States of America: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Suminar, E., & Meiyuntari, T. (2015). Konsep Diri, Konformitas dan Perilaku Konsumtif pada Remaja. Persona: Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, 4(02).
Witzig TE, Laumann KM, Lacy MQ, et al. (2012). A Phase III Randomized Trial of Thalidomide Plus Zoledronic Acid Versus Zoledronic Acid Alone in Patients with Asymptomatic Multiple Myeloma. Leukemia, 27(1); 220â€225. doi:10.1038/leu.2012.236