Transformasi Pendidikan Sains sebagai Penggerak Kompetensi Masa Depan Siswa Sekolah Dasar

Authors

  • Citra Raflesia Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • I Wayan Suastra Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • I Made Citra Wibawa Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • Ida Bagus Putu Arnyana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31539/q7kzsg68

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the role of science education in elementary schools in developing scientific thinking, science literacy, and 21st-century skills. The method used is a literature review through the analysis of various sources related to science education. The results indicate that science education is not merely a medium for transferring natural concepts, but also a means to foster scientific character, critical thinking, and creativity. The integration of technology, inquiry-based approaches, and project-based learning has been proven to enhance students' readiness for the digital era. In conclusion, science education requires curriculum transformation and capacity building for teachers to manage learning that fosters future competencies.

 

Keywords: Critical Thinking, Science Education, Science Literacy, Technology Integration, 21st-Century Learning

References

Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83(2), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415

Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. National Science Teachers Association Press.

Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa, T. R. (2015). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools (8th ed.). Pearson Education.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Harlen, W. (2015). Working with big ideas of science education. Science Education Programme, European Commission.

Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802691937

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Panduan implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia.

Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K., & Caspari, A. K. (2015). Guided inquiry: Learning in the 21st century. Libraries Unlimited.

Lin, M., & Chen, H. (2016). Effects of mobile learning on science achievement and attitude: A meta-analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(6), 870–885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9633-1

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.

Nugroho, A., Raharjo, S., & Utami, N. (2022). Implementasi pendidikan STEM dalam pengembangan kompetensi guru IPA sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 7(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpdi.v7i1.11112

OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/

Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2019). Framework for 21st century learning. https://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.

UNESCO. (2020). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444

Wahyudi, A. (2020). Inovasi pembelajaran IPA untuk meningkatkan literasi sains siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 5(2), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpdi.v5i2.28976

Wahono, B. (2021). Digital transformation in science education: Enhancing students’ engagement and understanding. Journal of Science Learning, 4(3), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v4i3.31712

Zed, M. (2014). Metode penelitian kepustakaan. Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-10