Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) Berpola Claim, Data, Warrant (Cdw) untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa
Abstract
This study aims to develop student worksheets (LKPD) patterned claim, data, warrant (CDW) on human respiratory system material and find out how teachers respond and student responses and the effect of using LKPD on student argumentation ability. The development model used in this research is addie development model consisting of 5 stages, namely analysis, planning, development, implementation and evaluation. The development of this LKPD uses due diligence based on expert validation of materials and validation of media experts, as well as teacher response and student response. Data analysis techniques used are qualitative and quantitative data analysis. The results of both validators state that LKPD is worthy of testing. Furthermore, the results of the teacher's response also stated that the LKPD is feasible in the trial with a score of 93%. Then the results of the odd and even group student response were obtained from kappa test of 0.673 with high category and correlation test of 0.806 with very strong category. This means that the two groups of students have been in touch and agreed to state that LKPD is worthy of trial. In conclusion, students can understand the problem of claims, data, warrant (CDW) arguments judging by the score of the paired sample t test of 0.000 which means that there is an influence of the use of student worksheets (LKPD) on students' argumentation ability.
Keywords: Claim, Data, Warrant (CDW), Student Worksheet (LKPD), Argumentation Ability.
References
Branch, R.M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. USE: Springer Science-Bisnis Media. LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA.
Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M.P. (2007). Argumentation in Science Education, Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research: Springer
Erduran, S., Simon, S. & Osborne, J. (2004). Tapping Into Argumentation: Development in The Application of Studyig Science Discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915-933.
Falk, A. & Brodsky, L. (2013). Scientific Argumentation as A Foundation For The Design of Inquiry-Based Science Instruction. The Journal of Mathematics and Science: Collaborative Exploration, 13(1), 27-55.
Ginanjar, W. S., Setiya Utari, & Muslim. (2015). Penerapan Model Argument- Driven Inquiry dalam Pembelajran IPA Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa SMP. Journal Pengajaran MIPA, 20(1), 32-37.
Hendri, S., & Defianti, A. (2015). Membentuk Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa Melalui Isu Sosial Ilmiah dalam Pembelajaran Sains. Prosiding Simposium Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Sains.
Kuhn, D. (2010). Teaching and Learning Science as Argument. Science Education, 94(5), 810-824.
Kusdiningsih, E.Z, dkk. (2016). Penerapan LKPD Berbasis Kemampuan Argumentasi-SWH SWH Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentas Tertulis dan Literasi Sains Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Progresif, 6(2).
Lee, W.W. dan Owens, D. L. (2004). Multimedia-Based Instructional Design. Second Edition. Reproduction by permission of Pfeiffer, in imprint of willey.
Mayer, R.E. (2009). Multimedia Learning: Prinsip-prinsip dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to Learn in Science. The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463-466.
Prastowo, Andi. (2015). Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif. Yogyakarta: Diva Press
Rusdi, M. (2018). Penelitian Desain dan Pengembangan Kependidikan. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Simon, S. (2008). Using Toulmin’s Argument Pattern in the Evaluation of Argumentation in School Science. Journal International Journal of Research&Method in Education, 31(3), 277-289.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan: Research & Development untuk Bidang Pendidikan, Manajemen, Sosial, dan Teknik. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sumarni, Widodo & Solihat. (2017). Stimulating Students Argumentation Using Drawing- Based Modeling On The Concept Of Ecosystem. International Journal of Science and Applied Science, 2(1), 98-104.
Toulmin, S.E. (2003). The uses of Argument (Updated Edition ed). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Trianto. (2010). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu: Konsep Strategi dan Implementasinya dalam KTSP. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Jurnal of Teacher Education 36 (1).
