Kumpulan Soal Argumentasi Berpola Claim, Data, Warrant (CDW)

Lailatul Hairi; Muhammad Haris Effendi Hasibuan

doi:10.31539/bioedusains.v3i2.1791

Lailatul Hairi Universitas Jambi
Muhammad Haris Effendi Hasibuan Universitas Jambi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31539/bioedusains.v3i2.1791

Abstract

This study aims to find out the effectiveness of product collection of items about argumentation pattern claim, data, and warrant against the arguments of students in the subjects of biology respiratory system material at SMA IX Negeri 2 Jambi City. This research uses ADDIE model (Analysis, Desaign, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation). Data collection methods used in this research are interview methods, questionnaires, and tests. The results showed the development of a collection of questions in sma negeri 2 jambi school with 10 questions and 6 respondents who gave pretest and posttest questions, then got a pretest result of 1.23 and a posttest average score of 3.75. Based on t paired test sample t tests obtained sig. (2-tailed) of 0.000< 0.05 then H0 rejected and Ha received, there is an influence on the collection of points of argumentation on the ability of students argumentation in SMA Negeri 2 Jambi City. In conclusion, the product of a collection of argument-patterned claims, data, and warrants (SDW) developed influenced the argumentation of students in the subjects of respiratory system material biology at SMA IX Negeri 2 Jambi City.

Keywords: Arguments, Problem Sets, Claim Patterns, Data, Warrant (CDW)

References

Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2007) Scientific Argument As Learning Artifact, Designning For Learning From The Web With KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 797-817.

Dawud. (2008). Penalaran dalam Karya Tulis Populer Argumentatif. Bahasa dan Seni, 36, (1), 41-48.

Effendi-Hsb, M. H., & Sulistyo, U. (2019, October). Promoting indonesian secondary school studentsâ€™ argumentation skills in the concept of chemistry reaction-rate: a comparative effect of three cooperative learning strategies. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317(1), p. 012143. IOP Publishing. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1317/1/012143.

Ekanara, B., Adisendjaja, Y. H., & Hamdiyati, Y. (2018). Hubungan Kemampuan Penalaran Dengan Keterampilan Argumentasi Siswa Pada Konsep Sistem Pencernaan Melalui PBL (Problem Based Learning). Biodidaktika: Jurnal Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 13(2).

Fisher, A. (2009). Berpikir Kritis. Jakarta: Penerbit Airlangga.

Mahnun, N. (2012). Media pembelajaran (kajian terhadap langkah-langkah pemilihan media dan implementasinya dalam pembelajaran). An-Nida', 37(1), 27-34.

Pemerintah Indonesia No. 2 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional Bab 2 pasal 3. Lembaran Negara RI tahun 2003,Sekretariat Negara. Jakarta.

Suriasumantri, J. S. (2007). Filsafat ilmu. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

TIMSS. (2012). Trends International Mathematics and Science Student (TIMSS) 2011: Encyclopedia: Education Policy and Curriculum in Mathematics and Science, Volumes 1 and 2. Chestnut Hill, MA: International Study Center, Boston College.http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/ti mss2011/encyclopedia-timss.html.

Toulmin. (1984). An Introduction to Reasoning. New York: MacMillan. .