Pembelajaran PjBL Berbasis Environmental-Stream untuk Meningkatkan Berpikir Kreatif pada Pembuatan Briket

Ilmi Fara Fadlika; Tri Wahyu Agustina; Asrianty Mas’ud

doi:10.31539/56jqy012

Authors

Ilmi Fara Fadlika Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati
Tri Wahyu Agustina Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati
Asrianty Mas’ud Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31539/56jqy012

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the implementation of Environmental-STREAM-based Project-Based Learning (PjBL) and to examine improvements in students’ creative thinking skills regarding environmental change through the production of briquettes from coconut shell waste. The method used was a Quasi-Experimental Design with a Static Group Pretest-Posttest design. The research subjects were 46 tenth-grade students at a Madrasah Aliyah in Bandung Regency, divided into an experimental class (Environmental-STREAM-based PjBL) and a control class (PjBL without the Environmental-STREAM approach). The instruments used included an observation sheet for the implementation of the learning process and short-answer questions based on Torrance’s indicators of creative thinking, namely fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. The results showed that the implementation of instruction achieved an average of 93.33% (teachers) and 95.00% (students), both falling into the very good category. N-gain analysis indicated that the experimental class achieved a 70.5% increase in creative thinking (high category) and the control class achieved a 43.0% increase (moderate category). The largest differences in improvement occurred in the indicators of originality (48.0%) and elaboration (37.8%), indicating that the environmental context in Environmental-STREAM-based learning can foster these two aspects of creative thinking. The conclusion of this study is that Environmental-STREAM-based PjBL can enhance students’ creative thinking, particularly in the aspects of originality and elaboration.

Keywords: Briquettes, Creative Thinking, Environmental Change, Environmental-STREAM, Project-Based Learning.

References

Agustina, W. T., Rustaman, N. Y., & Purwianingsih, W. (2019). Membekalkan kreativitas mahasiswa melalui strategi pembelajaran berbasis STREAM menggunakan konten bioteknologi tradisional. Bioeduin, 9(1), 43–52.

Agustina, T. W., Rustaman, N. Y., Riandi, & Purwianingsih, W. (2020). The STREAM approach (Science-Technology-Religion-Engineering-Arts-Mathematics) provides students' thinking habits. Edusains, 12(2), 283–296.

Andrade, C. (2021). The limitations of quasi-experimental studies, and methods for data analysis when a quasi-experimental research design is unavoidable. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 43(5), 458–460.

Arikunto, S. (2012). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Artika, W., & Rosemary, R. (2023). Environmental STEM (E-STEM) in building climate-resilient communities in Aceh: Students' awareness. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(8), 6238–6246. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i8.4970

Aryanti, Y., Afandi, Wahyuni, E. S., & Putra, D. A. (2021). Torrance creative thinking profile of senior high school students in biology learning: Preliminary research. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1842(1), 012080. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1842/1/012080

Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Dewi, P. S. (2021). E-Learning: PjBL pada mata kuliah pengembangan kurikulum dan silabus. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 1332–1340.

Ellis, S. M., & Steyn, H. S. (2003). Practical significance (effect sizes) versus or in combination with statistical significance (p-values). Management Dynamics, 12(4), 51–53.

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fraenkel, L., Peters, E., Charpentier, P., Olsen, B., Errante, L., Schoen, R. T., & Reyna, V. (2012). Decision tool to improve the quality of care in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care & Research, 64(7), 977–985.

Haliza, H. N., & Saroso, H. (2022). Pembuatan bio-briket dari sabut kelapa dan serbuk kayu jati dengan menggunakan perekat tepung tapioka. Distilat: Jurnal Teknologi Separasi, 8(1), 238–244.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Hariyanto, A. B., & Jannah, U. R. (2020). Revolusi guru dalam pembelajaran abad 21. Sigma, 5(2), 77–84.

Helvaci, S. C., & Helvaci, I. (2019). An interdisciplinary environmental education approach: Determining the effects of E-STEM activity on environmental awareness. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(2), 337–346.

Isma, A., Makassar, U. N., Barat, U. S., & Teknik, F. (2023). Peta permasalahan pendidikan abad 21 di Indonesia. JUPITER: Jurnal Pendidikan Terapan, 1(September), 11–28.

Istiqomah, I. L., Suratman, & Solichatun. (2025). Pengembangan bahan ajar IPAS berbasis SETS terhadap keterampilan berpikir kreatif siswa pada pembelajaran berdiferensiasi sekolah dasar. Bioscientist: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.33394/bioscientist.v13i1.14541

Jannah, M. L., & El-Yunusi, M. Y. M. (2021). Implementasi E-Modul Project Based Learning pada Pembelajaran PAI dalam meningkatkan Keaktifan Belajar Santri di Pondok Pesantren Nurul Ikhlas Sidoarjo. Sulawesi Tenggara Educational Journal, 4(3), 76–85.

Kemendikbud. (2020). Panduan pembelajaran dan asesmen. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Capaian pembelajaran pada pendidikan anak usia dini, jenjang pendidikan dasar, dan jenjang pendidikan menengah pada Kurikulum Merdeka (Keputusan Kepala BSKAP No. 033/H/KR/2022). Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

Koculu, A., & Girgin, S. (2022). The effect of E-STEM education on students' perceptions and engineering design process about environmental issues. World Journal of Education, 12(6), 49–55.

Laboy-Rush, D. (2010). Integrated STEM education through project-based learning. Learning. Com, 12(4), 1–12.

Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 international results in science. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/international-results/

Mulyadi, E., Yusuf, Y., & Yuliawati, L. (2024). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa SMP pada materi relasi dan fungsi. Jurnal Theorems (The Original Research of Mathematics), 8(2), 371–382.

Nita, R. S., & Irwandi, I. (2021). Peningkatan keterampilan berpikir kreatif siswa melalui model Project Based Learning (PjBL). BIOEDUSAINS: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi dan Sains, 4(2), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.31539/bioedusains.v4i2.2503

Nufus, T. H., Pramono, A. E., Dermawan, A., Ridlwan, H. M., Arnanda, R., & Rizkia, V. (2024). Pemanfaatan sampah organik untuk pembuatan briket arang sebagai energi ramah lingkungan dan usaha meningkatkan kemandirian desa. Mitra Akademia: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 7(1), 1–7.

OECD. (2024). New PISA results on creative thinking (PISA in Focus, Vol. 125). https://doi.org/10.1787/b3a46696-en

Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2015). P21 framework definitions. Battelle for Kids. https://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21

Pratiwi, S. N., Cari, C., & Aminah, N. S. (2019). Pembelajaran IPA abad 21 dengan literasi sains siswa. Jurnal Materi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 9(1), 34–42.

Pulungan, N. A., & Khairuna, K. (2023). Pengaruh model pembelajaran Project Based Learning (PjBL) terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa. BIOEDUSAINS: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi dan Sains, 6(2), 422–431. https://doi.org/10.31539/bioedusains.v6i2.7249

Putri, Y. A., & Zulyusri, Z. (2022). Meta-analisis pengaruh model Project Based Learning terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa pada pembelajaran biologi. Bioeduca: Journal of Biology Education, 4(2), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.21580/bioeduca.v4i2.11891

Ridha, M. R., Zuhdi, M., & Ayub, S. (2022). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran PjBL berbasis STEM dalam meningkatkan kreativitas fisika peserta didik. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 7(1), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v7i1.447

Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (Rev.ed.). SAGE Publications.

Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Suparya, I. K., Suastra, I. W., & Arnyana, I. B. P. (2022). Rendahnya literasi sains: Faktor penyebab dan alternatif solusinya. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Citra Bakti, 9(1), 153–166.

Susilo, B., & Salirawati, D. (2025). Improving Students' Creative Thinking In Macromolecule Lessons Through AI-Based Ethnochemistry Project-Based Learning. Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(6), 5277–5296. https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.9.6.p.5277-5296

Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Suyono, S., Tukiran, T., & Yuliaturosida, E. (2025). Exploring project-based learning for enhancing creative thinking in high schools: A bibliometric analysis and literature review. Educational Process: International Journal, 18, e2025480. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.17.480

Syahputri, N. D., & Simatupang, H. (2025). Pengaruh model PjBL terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif peserta didik pada submateri pencemaran lingkungan hidup kelas X di SMAN 5 Medan. EDUBIOPRENA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, Biologi, & Bioentrepreneurship, 2(2), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.26877/shzgcy13

Torrance, E.P. (1974). Norms-Technical Manual Torrance Test of Creative Thinking. Lexington, Massachusetts: Ginn and Company.

Wibowo, G. J., Purwianingsih, W., & Kusnadi. (2021). Analyse of creative thinking ability of vocational students after waste management project-based learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), 012148. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012148

Wijayanti, W., Harlita, H., & Sugiharto, B. (2025). Profil kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa pada materi perubahan lingkungan. Bioscientist: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi, 13(2), 1093–1099. https://doi.org/10.33394/bioscientist.v13i2.16273

Yuliani, H., Mariati, M., Yulianti, R., & Herianto, C. (2017). Keterampilan berpikir kreatif pada siswa sekolah menengah di Palangka Raya menggunakan pendekatan saintifik. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Keilmuan (JPFK), 3(1), 48–56.

Yusuf, I. R., Ukit, U., & Paujiah, E. (2018). Pengaruh integrasi nilai-nilai Islam melalui pendekatan iman dan taqwa (Imtaq) pada hasil belajar sistem reproduksi manusia di MAN 2 Kota Bandung. Bioilmi: Jurnal Pendidikan, 4(2), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.19109/bioilmi.v4i2.2875

Zahra, P., & Rahmiati. (2025). Investigating the effect of project-based learning on the science learning outcomes of fifth grade students in elementary school. Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(4), 3007–3018. https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.9.4.p.3007-3018